RESUMEN
Although the probability of both parents being affected by BRCA1 mutations is not negligible, such families have not been systematically described in the literature. Here we present a large breast-ovarian cancer family, where 3 sisters and 1 half-sister inherited maternal BRCA1 5382insC mutation while the remaining 2 sisters carried paternal BRCA1 1629delC allele. No BRCA1 homozygous mutations has been detected, that is consistent with the data on lethality of BRCA1 knockout mice. This report exemplifies that the identification of a single cancer-predisposing mutation within the index patient may not be sufficient in some circumstances. Ideally, all family members affected by breast or ovarian tumor disease have to be subjected to the DNA testing, and failure to detect the mutation in any of them calls for the search of the second cancer-associated allele.
RESUMEN
This study was aimed to assess the role of CHEK2 1100delC mutation in breast cancer (BC) predisposition in Russia. The 1100delC allele was detected in 14/660 (2.1%) unilateral BC cases and in 8/155 (5.2%) patients with the bilateral form of the disease, but only in 1/448 (0.2%) middle-aged control females and in none of 373 elderly tumor-free women. The obtained data point at potentially high clinical relevance of CHEK2 1100delC testing in females of Russian origin and warrant similar case-control studies in ethnically and geographically related regions, especially in Ukraine, Belarus and Baltic countries.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinasas/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Quinasa de Punto de Control 2 , Femenino , Frecuencia de los Genes , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Federación de Rusia/epidemiología , Población Blanca/genéticaRESUMEN
BRCA1 5382insC variant was repeatedly detected in Jewish breast cancer (BC) families residing in USA and Israel as well as in non-Jewish familial BC patients from Poland, Latvia, Hungary, Russia and some other European countries. However, the distribution of BRCA1 5382insC mutation in unselected BC cases vs. controls has been systematically investigated mainly in Ashkenazi Jews. Here we applied a case-control study design in order to evaluate the impact of BRCA1 5382insC allele on BC incidence in St Petersburg, Russia. High frequency of the BRCA1 5382insC allele was detected in a group of bilateral breast cancer patients (10.4%; 15/144). Randomly selected unilateral BC cases demonstrated noticeable occurrence of BRCA1 5382insC mutation as well (3.7%; 32/857), with evident excess of the carriers in the early-onset (40 years) category (6.1%; 6/99) and in patients reporting breast and/or ovarian tumours in first-degree relatives (11.3%; 11/97). Strikingly, none of 478 middle-aged controls and 344 elderly tumour-free women carried the 5382insC variant. The presented data confirm a noticeable contribution of BRCA1 5382insC mutation in BC development in Russia, that may justify an extended BRCA1 5382insC testing within this population.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Genes BRCA1 , Mutación/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Frecuencia de los Genes , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Federación de RusiaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are activated by cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) and inactivated by glutathione S-transferase mu (GSTM1). Therefore, it is expected that a combination of proficient CYP1A1 genotype with deficient GSTM1 variant would result in particularly elevated lung cancer (LC) risk, especially for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). This study was aimed to validate whether the CYP1A1-C (3801) (CYP1A1*2) allele has an unfavorable significance alone and/or in combination with the GSTM1 deficiency. METHODS: We compared the distribution of CYP1A1 and GSTM1 genotypes in LC patients (n=141), healthy donors (HD, n=204), and elderly tumor-free smokers and non-smokers (ED, n=246). RESULTS: CYP1A1*2 allele carriers demonstrated a clear-cut association with SCC: the adjusted odds ratios (OR) were 2.22 (95% CI=1.06-4.63) and 2.27 (95% CI=1.14-4.52) when HD and ED were used as referents, respectively. CYP1A1*2(+)/GSTM1(-) combined genotypes were overrepresented in the SCC patients (14/70, 20.0%) and underrepresented in the ED (19/246, 7.7%) as compared to the intermediate prevalence in the HD (26/204, 12.7%); the adjusted OR for SCC versus ED reached 3.85 (95% CI=1.43-10.33). CONCLUSIONS: In agreement with some literature data, our results support the concerted role of CYP1A1 and GSTM1 at-risk genotypes in SCC predisposition.