Asunto(s)
Hepatopatías/diagnóstico por imagen , Hepatopatías/etiología , Úlcera Péptica/complicaciones , Úlcera Péptica/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Adulto , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Hematemesis/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Melena/etiología , Úlcera Péptica/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
Background and Purpose- Rapid reperfusion with mechanical thrombectomy in ischemic strokes with emergent large vessel occlusions leads to significant reduction in morbidity and mortality. The door-in-door-out (DIDO) time is an important metric for stroke centers without an on-site mechanical thrombectomy service. We report the outcome of a continuous quality improvement program to improve the DIDO time since 2015. Methods- Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients transferred out from a metropolitan primary stroke center for consideration of mechanical thrombectomy between January 1, 2015, and October 31, 2018. Clinical records were interrogated for eligible patients with DIDO times and reasons for treatment delays extracted. Results- One hundred thirty-three patients were transferred over the 46-month period. Median DIDO time reduced by 14% per year, from 111 minutes interquartile range (IQR, 98- 142) in 2015 to 67 minutes (IQR, 55-94) in 2018. A median DIDO time of 59 minutes (IQR, 51-80) was achieved in 2018 during working hours (0800-1700 hours). Overall, 65 patients had no documented delays (49%) with a median DIDO time of 75 minutes (IQR, 54-93) and 103 minutes (IQR, 75-143) in those with at least one delay factor documented. Conclusions- A median DIDO time of <60 minutes can be achieved in a primary stroke center.
Asunto(s)
Transferencia de Pacientes , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , TrombectomíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Inappropriate cardiac telemetry use is associated with reduced patient flow and increased healthcare costs. AIM: To evaluate the outcomes of guideline-based application of cardiac telemetry. METHODS: Phase I involved a prospective audit (March to August 2011) of telemetry use at a tertiary hospital. Data were collected on indication for telemetry and clinical outcomes. Phase II prospectively included patients more than 18 years under general medicine requiring ward-based telemetry. As phase II occurred at a time remotely from phase I, an audit similar to phase I (phase II - baseline) was completed prior to a 3-month intervention (May to August 2015). The intervention consisted of a daily telemetry ward round and an admission form based on the American Heart Association guidelines (class I, telemetry indicated; class II, telemetry maybe indicated; class III, telemetry not indicated). Patient demographics, telemetry data, and clinical outcomes were studied. Primary endpoint was the percentage reduction of class III indications, while secondary endpoint included telemetry duration. RESULTS: In phase I (n = 200), 38% were admitted with a class III indication resulting in no change in clinical management. A total of 74 patients was included in phase II baseline (mean ± standard deviation (SD) age 73 years ± 14.9, 57% male), whilst 65 patients were included in the intervention (mean ± SD age 71 years ± 18.4, 35% male). Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. There was a reduction in class III admissions post-intervention from 38% to 11%, P < 0.001. Intervention was associated with a reduction in median telemetry duration (1.8 ± 1.8 vs 2.4 ± 2.5 days, P = 0.047); however, length of stay was similar in both groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Guideline-based telemetry admissions and a regular telemetry ward round are associated with a reduction in inappropriate telemetry use.