RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Weil's osteotomy (WO) and distal metatarsal metaphyseal osteotomy (DMMO) are considered to be the gold standard of managing metatarsalgia. Stiffness and floating toe are the main disadvantages of the WO, whereas delayed union or malunion and prolonged swelling are the main complications of the DMMO. The purpose of this study is to compare these two methods, in terms of outcome and complications, through a metaanalysis of the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pubmed, Google Scholar and Mendeley databases were searched for studies comparing directly the outcome of DMMO and Weil's osteotomy, with a minimum follow up of six months. The random effects model was used for the metaanalysis. The quality of studies was assessed using the MINORS criteria. RESULTS: Four studies were eligible for the analysis including 211 patients in total. The mean difference of the postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and the visual analogue scale (VAS) among the two techniques was - 1,04 (C.I.: -3,50 - 1,43) and - 0,39 (CI: -0,83 - 0,08) respectively. The risk difference regarding postoperative stiffness, swelling and residual metatarsalgia was - 0,09 (95% C.I.: -0,23 - 0,06), - 0,17 (95% C.I.: -0,62 - 0,29) and - 0,06 (95% C.I.: -0,20 - 0,08) respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on the existing literature, Weil's osteotomy and DMMO are equally safe and effective for the treatment of metatarsalgia. More studies of better quality are required, in order to extract safer and absolute conclusions regarding this topic.

Asunto(s)

Huesos Metatarsianos , Metatarsalgia , Osteotomía , Humanos , Osteotomía/métodos , Metatarsalgia/cirugía , Huesos Metatarsianos/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Complicaciones Posoperatorias

RESUMEN

Partial quadriceps tendon ruptures are rare and they are usually managed non-operatively, provided that the extensor mechanism is intact. In case the extension mechanism is compromised, a more aggressive treatment is required, which includes surgical repair of the tendon. We present an extremely rare case of a 42-year-old male lifter who sustained a quadriceps tendon delamination tear, after lifting weights. Careful clinical examination revealed a compromised extension mechanism of the knee. Proper imaging confirmed the diagnosis of partial but significant rupture of the undersurface of the quadriceps tendon, which was treated operatively (standard tendon repair with the Krakow technique and three transosseous tunnels) with a very good outcome.

RESUMEN

Pure dislocation of the ankle is an extremely rare injury accounting for only 0.065% of all ankle injuries and 0.46% of all ankle dislocations. The mechanism of the injury generally consists of high-energy trauma which is associated with a combination of plantar flexion and inversion or eversion of the foot. We present a case of a 22-year-old male patient who sustained a closed pure ankle dislocation after a fall from a small height. He was treated conservatively with closed reduction and circumferential cast immobilization for six weeks, followed by a functional rehabilitation program. The patient presented to the emergency department with an acutely painful and deformed right ankle after falling from a height of 1 m (stairs). Radiographs showed a posteromedial ankle dislocation without fracture. Urgent closed reduction of the dislocation was performed and a posterior below-knee back slab was applied to immobilize the ankle. Dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial arteries were intact. Check X-rays confirmed proper reduction of the ankle joint. Post reduction computed tomography (CT) scan did not show any associated fractures. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a multiligamentous ankle injury and a small osteochondral lesion of the anteromedial talar dome. The back slab was changed to a below-knee circular cast two weeks later, as soon as the soft tissue swelling subsided. The cast was removed at the six-week follow-up and physiotherapy was initiated in order to gain functional rehabilitation and improve the range of motion. At the final follow-up (12 months), the ankle range of motion (ROM) was the same as the pre-injury status and the patient was able to return to his work. Pure ankle dislocation is a rare injury. A satisfactory outcome can be expected, provided that the appropriate conservative treatment followed by a strict rehabilitation protocol is applied.