RESUMEN

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is a common malignancy of the skin and has an overall favorable outcome, except for patients with an advanced stage of the disease. The efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) for advanced cSCC has been demonstrated in recent clinical studies, but data from real-world cohorts and trial-ineligible cSCC patients are limited. We retrospectively investigated patients with advanced cSCC who have been treated with CPI in a first-line setting at eight German skin cancer centers registered within the multicenter registry ADOReg. Clinical outcome parameters including response, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS), time-to-next-treatment (TTNT), and toxicity were analyzed and have been stratified by the individual immune status. Among 39 evaluable patients, the tumor response rate (rwTRR) was 48.6%, the median PFS was 29.0 months, and the median OS was not reached. In addition, 9 patients showed an impaired immune status due to immunosuppressive medication or hematological diseases. Our data demonstrated that CPI also evoked tumor responses among immunocompromised patients (rwTRR: 48.1 vs. 50.0%), although these responses less often resulted in durable remissions. In line with this, the median PFS (11 vs. 40 months, p = 0.059), TTNT (12 months vs. NR, p = 0.016), and OS (29 months vs. NR, p < 0.001) were significantly shorter for this patient cohort. CPI therapy was well tolerated in both subcohorts with 15% discontinuing therapy due to toxicity. Our real-world data show that first-line CPI therapy produced strong and durable responses among patients with advanced cSCC. Immunocompromised patients were less likely to achieve long-term benefit from anti-PD1 treatment, despite similar tumor response rates.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: The combination of bevacizumab (BEV) plus interferon alpha-2a (IFN) constitutes an option for first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Real-world data from routine clinical practice are rare and were, therefore, collected during this non-interventional study (NIS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 359 patients received at least one dose of BEV (safety set population; SAF), 354 patients had at least one post-dose effectiveness assessment and formed the full analysis set (FAS) of the final analysis. RESULTS: Progression-free survival (10.2 months, 95% CI=8.6-12.6) and overall response rate (27.2%) outcomes match the results from the phase III trials AVOREN and CALGB 90206. Longer overall survival (28.7 months, 95% CI=24.5-38.3) probably is an effect of patient characteristics and follow-up therapies. Safety findings were comparable to the results of the Phase III trials, although comprehensive severity assessments were not provided. CONCLUSION: Overall, efficacy and safety data from BEV plus IFN administered in routine clinical practice in an observational NIS are in line with results from the controlled phase III trials. (NCT02627144).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this observational study was to evaluate feasibility, efficacy results and toxicity observations of capecitabine in routine first line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, with particular regard of elderly patients (>75 years of age). METHODS: Patients with colorectal cancer receiving capecitabine as part of their first-line treatment were recorded until detection of disease progression or up to a maximum of 12 cycles on standardized evaluation forms. Additional information on long-term outcomes, progression-free survival, and overall survival were retrieved at two follow-up time points. Obtained data were analyzed with regard to age up to 75 and >75 years of age. There were no specific requirements for patient selection and conduct of therapy, corresponding to the non-interventional nature of the study. RESULTS: In total, 1249 evaluable patients were enrolled in Germany. The median age of the study population was 74 years (range: 21-99). Capecitabine-based combination was administered in 56% of patients in the overall population. The median treatment duration was about 5 months. Severe toxicities occurred rarely without any difference regarding age groups. The most common hematological toxicity was anemia. Gastrointestinal side effects and hand-food-syndrome (HFS) were the most frequent non-hematologic toxicities. Overall response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in the patient group <=75 years compared to patients >75 years of age (38 vs. 32%, p=0.019). Median progression free survival (PFS 9.7 vs. 8.2 months, p=0.00021) and overall survival (OS 31.0 vs. 22.6 months, p<0.0001) was decreased in elderly patients. CONCLUSION: Efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine treatment either as single drug or in various combination regimens, as proven in randomized studies, could be confirmed in a clinical routine setting. Patients older than 75 years may derive a relevant benefit by first line capecitabine-based treatment with good tolerability.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This observational study was conducted to document the safety of capecitabine-based adjuvant therapy in patients with resected colon cancer under routine clinical conditions. RESEARCH AND DESIGN METHODS: ML20431 was a prospective, multicenter, non-interventional, observational study. It was designed to answer five research questions relating to safety, dosage and administration, and discontinuation from capecitabine-based adjuvant therapy. Patients were required to have R0 resected stage III colon cancer and have started treatment with capecitabine-based adjuvant therapy based on a decision by the investigator. Patients were followed over an observation period of ≤6 months after initiation of therapy. Investigators were required to complete the study case report form at study entry, each treatment cycle, and at the final examination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A total of 1485 patients were included in the study, and 1481 patients were treated with capecitabine and formed the analysis population. Most patients had colon cancer (78.3%), followed by rectal cancer (16.4%). Most patients had stage III disease (69.3%); the remaining patients had stage II disease (30.7%). The most common all-grade adverse reactions were hand-foot syndrome (46.9%), diarrhea (34.4%), and hemoglobin decreases (31.5%). Grade 3/4 adverse reactions were infrequent (<4%). Serious adverse events were reported in 96 patients (6.5%). Six or more cycles of treatment were completed by 77.9% of patients. Approximately two-thirds of patients (67.3%) received capecitabine monotherapy and the remainder (32.7%) received capecitabine in combination with ≥1 drugs, most commonly oxaliplatin (460 cases). Discontinuation of capecitabine was documented in 344 patients (23.2%). STUDY LIMITATIONS: no efficacy data were collected; the questionnaires for patients' expectations and satisfaction were not formally validated; and a few patients (<1.5%) had some retrospective data. CONCLUSIONS: The safety profile of capecitabine-based adjuvant therapy in a broad patient population with colon cancer is similar to that previously documented in phase III clinical trials.

Asunto(s)