RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) benefits from initiation and intensification of multiple pharmacotherapies. Unfortunately, there are major gaps in the routine use of these drugs. Without novel approaches to improve prescribing, the cumulative benefits of HFrEF treatment will be largely unrealized. Direct-to-consumer marketing and shared decision making reflect a culture where patients are increasingly involved in treatment choices, creating opportunities for prescribing interventions that engage patients. HYPOTHESIS: Encouraging patients to engage providers in HFrEF prescribing decisions will improve the use of guideline-directed medical therapies. DESIGN: The Electronically delivered, Patient-activation tool for Intensification of Chronic medications for Heart Failure with reduced ejection fraction (EPIC-HF) trial randomizes patients with HFrEF to usual care versus patient-activation tools-a 3-minute video and 1-page checklist-delivered prior to cardiology clinic visits that encourage patients to work collaboratively with their clinicians to intensify HFrEF prescribing. The study assesses the effectiveness of the EPIC-HF intervention to improve guideline-directed medical therapy in the month after its delivery while using an implementation design to also understand the reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of this approach within the context of real-world care delivery. Study enrollment was completed in January 2020, with a total 305 patients. Baseline data revealed significant opportunities, with <1% of patients on optimal HFrEF medical therapy. SUMMARY: The EPIC-HF trial assesses the implementation, effectiveness, and safety of patient engagement in HFrEF prescribing decisions. If successful, the tool can be easily disseminated and may inform similar interventions for other chronic conditions.
Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Participación del Paciente , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Volumen Sistólico , Adulto , Femenino , Mal Uso de los Servicios de Salud , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/psicología , Humanos , Intervención basada en la Internet , Masculino , Participación del Paciente/métodos , Participación del Paciente/psicología , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Registries are fundamental to the success of population health initiatives to improve care and outcomes for patients, including those with depression. The purpose of this article is to describe the design and clinical implementation of a depression registry as part of a collaborative care for depression intervention at 2 large academic outpatient internal medicine practices. The primary objective of the registry was to identify and track patients with depression and monitor antidepressant therapy. Secondary objectives of the registry were to assist in addressing pay-for-performance and value-based reimbursement metrics for depression screening and remission. The registry design and variables for inclusion in the registry were defined with input from clinicians, institutional leadership, and data analysts. For implementation, specific clinical workflows were established and responsible team roles were designated.
Asunto(s)
Depresión/epidemiología , Atención Primaria de Salud , Desarrollo de Programa/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Depresión/diagnóstico , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Humanos , Modelos Organizacionales , Sistema de Registros/normas , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: A pharmacist-managed chronic pain clinic (PMCPC) in a primary care setting is described. SUMMARY: As primary care providers (PCPs) may be unprepared or lack time to manage high-risk patients receiving opioids for chronic nonmalignant pain, alternative models of care are needed. The University of Colorado PMCPC is integrated into an internal medicine outpatient clinic. The PMCPC is staffed by 1 clinical pharmacist, with pharmacy students and residents also performing clinic duties. The pharmacy team reviews health records to determine eligibility for PMCPC services and documents referral requests in the electronic health record (EHR); on PCP acceptance of a referral, the pharmacy team assumes primary responsibility for the patient's pain management under a collaborative practice agreement. Using a collaborative drug therapy management (CDTM) protocol, the pharmacy team conducts patient assessments, including an assessment for signs of aberrant drug-taking behaviors; provides initial and ongoing counseling and education; and makes recommendations to the PCP for opioid dosage adjustments and regimen additions and discontinuations. Experience at the clinic to date indicates that the PMCPC model is feasible and accepted by PCPs and patients. CONCLUSION: A PMCPC based in a primary care setting was established to improve the care of patients with chronic nonmalignant pain who are prescribed opioid therapy for a period of 3 months or longer. Clinic patients are referred to the clinic through the EHR and managed by a pharmacist under a CDTM protocol.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/terapia , Manejo del Dolor/tendencias , Servicios Farmacéuticos/tendencias , Farmacéuticos/tendencias , Atención Primaria de Salud/tendencias , Rol Profesional , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Humanos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodosRESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to identify and characterize adverse drug events (ADEs) in a primary care setting using an electronic health record (EHR). This prospective, observational study enrolled patients with any medication change who were seen at an outpatient internal medicine clinic. Patients were evaluated for ADEs by EHR review and telephone interview. ADEs were independently assessed for causality, severity, preventability, and ameliorability by a physician and a pharmacist using a grading instrument. There were 1368 unique medication changes for 701 individuals who completed the study (1.95 changes per person). Of the 226 suspected ADEs, 68 (58%) were deemed to be "definite" or "probable" following causality assessment; 21% were preventable and 40% ameliorable. Only 2 ADEs were serious or life-threatening. Compared with prior reports, ADEs in primary care have decreased in frequency and severity, yet the occurrence of preventable and ameliorable ADEs has increased.