RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Breast abscesses are localized purulent collections, often arising from bacterial mastitis, and pose significant health risks, especially for lactating women. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and outcomes of two different treatment approaches: Traditional incision and drainage (I&D) versus ultrasound (USG)-guided aspiration in breast abscess management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty female patients with breast abscesses were enrolled and divided into two groups: Group A (n = 25, I&D) and group B (n = 25, USG-guided aspiration). Group A underwent I&D under general anaesthesia and group B underwent USG-guided aspiration under local anaesthesia. The patients were followed up for two weeks after the procedure. Patient demographics, abscess characteristics, treatment outcomes, and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 36.4 and 31.8 in group A and B, respectively and the mean abscess size was 5.7 cm. The study found that USG-guided aspiration was associated with several advantages over I&D. Patients in group B experienced shorter healing times (5 days vs. 13 days, p = 0.001), lower rates of residual abscesses (12% vs. 36%, p = 0.047), and no recurrence after two weeks vs. 28% in group A (p = 0.012). Notably, the resumption of lactation was significantly greater in group B (91.67% vs. 20%). Importantly, patients in group B had no scarring, while 37% in group A healed with scars. CONCLUSION: These results highlight that USG-guided aspiration offers a minimally invasive and effective method for managing breast abscesses, leading to quicker recovery, better cosmetic outcomes, and higher patient satisfaction compared to the traditional I&D approach. Early diagnosis and intervention with USG-guided aspiration can prevent complications and reduce the need for open surgery. Based on these findings, USG-guided aspiration is a safer and more efficient method for treating breast abscesses, particularly when initiated promptly after diagnosis.