RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer treatment requires a complex, multidisciplinary approach. Because of the potential variability, monitoring through clinical audits is advisable. This study assesses the effects of a quality improvement action plan in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and treated with radiotherapy. METHODS: Comparative, multicentre study in two cohorts of 120 patients each, selected randomly from patients diagnosed with rectal cancer who had initiated radiotherapy with a curative intent. Based on the results from a baseline clinical audit in 2013, a quality improvement action plan was designed and implemented; a second audit in 2017 evaluated its impact. RESULTS: Standardised information was present on 77.5% of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) staging reports. Treatment strategies were similar in all three study centres. Of the patients whose treatment was interrupted, just 9.7% received a compensation dose. There was an increase in MRI re-staging from 32.5 to 61.5%, and a significant decrease in unreported circumferential resection margins following neoadjuvant therapy (ypCRM), from 34.5 to 5.6% (p <  0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The comparison between two clinical audits showed improvements in neoadjuvant radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients. Some indicators reveal areas in need of additional efforts, for example to reduce the overall treatment time.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic approach to cancer is complex and multidisciplinary. Radiotherapy is among the essential treatments, whether used alone or in conjunction with other therapies. This study reports a clinical audit of the radiotherapy process to assess the process of care, evaluate adherence to agreed protocols and measure the variability to improve therapeutic quality for rectal cancer. METHODS: Multicentre retrospective cohort study in a representative sample of patients diagnosed with rectal cancer in the Institut Català d'Oncologia, a comprehensive cancer centre with three different settings. We developed a set of indicators to assess the key areas of the radiotherapy process. The clinical audit consisted of a review of a random sample of 40 clinical histories for each centre. RESULTS: The demographic profile, histology and staging of patients were similar between centres. The MRI reports did not include the distance from tumour to mesorectal fascia (rCRM) in 38.3% of the cases. 96.7% of patients received the planned dose, and 57.4% received it at the planned time. Surgery followed neoadjuvant treatment in 96.7% of the patients. Among this group, postoperative CRM was recorded in 65.5% of the cases and was negative in 93.4% of these. With regard to the 34.5% (n = 40) of cases where no CRM value was stated, there were differences between the centres. Mean follow-up was 3.4 (SD 0.6) years, and overall survival at four years was 81.7%. CONCLUSIONS: The audit revealed a suboptimal degree of adherence to clinical practice guidelines. Significant variability between centres exists from a clinical perspective but especially with regard to organization and process.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Analysis of the results obtained in terms of improvement in the continuity of care, its resolutive capacity and accessibility, in the framework of the organisational change brought about by the reorganisation of specialist care (RSC) in the Ciutat Vella Health Sector. DESIGN: A descriptive study of the reorganised model of specialist care introduced in 1995 and comparison between this and the previous model (1993) in terms of activity, further tests made, referral to hospital, filling in the clinical history and waiting-list. T SETTING: The experience involved 4 PCTs in the Ciutat Vella Health sector of Barcelona (covering 74,449 people). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The volume of visits was in general less in 1995, while other types of activity had been incorporated: minor surgery, cryotherapy, consultations and sessions. CONCLUSIONS: The model of RSC satisfies the basic objectives for which it was designed. It increased the specialist's ability to resolve the case within Primary Care. It improved user accessibility to specialist care in terms of waiting time. Finally, the model favours ongoing care, thanks to a single clinical history for both levels.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: High blood pressure is a cardiovascular risk factor whose coincidence with other risk factors considerably increases the probability for coronary heart disease. This study investigates the prevalence of different risk factors in hypertensive subjects. METHODS: We studied 891 patients with high blood pressure in their first visit to a hospital hypertension unit between 1987 and 1991. We assessed their clinical evolution and the prevalence of obesity, smoking, alcohol consumption, elevated blood pressure, diabetes, sedentary lifestyle, left ventricular hypertrophy and family history of high blood pressure. RESULTS: Sixteen per cent of the hypertensive subjects related previous history of evolutive accident. Stroke was the most frequent one. Prevalences of cardiovascular risk factors were as follows: family history of high blood pressure 53%, sedentary lifestyle 52%, elevated blood cholesterol 37%, smoking 35%, obesity 33%, left ventricular hypertrophy 16%, alcohol consumption 13% and diabetes 11%. Obesity prevalence was twice as high in women than in men. Males had higher prevalence for left ventricular hypertrophy, smoking and alcohol consumption. Diabetes was more prevalent in hypertensive patients older than 50 years. Prevalence of high blood cholesterol was greater in the group of women older than 50 years. CONCLUSIONS: Hypertensive patients have high prevalences of other cardiovascular risk factors. Their treatment should be aimed to improving the individual profile of cardiovascular risk.

Asunto(s)