Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Chiropr Man Therap ; 26: 33, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30302238

RESUMEN

Background: Spinal epidural lipomatosis is an uncommon source of neurogenic claudication. We present two cases of spinal epidural lipomatosis as it relates to diagnosis, management, and a possible association with common medical intervention. Case presentation: Case 1: 63-year old male patient presented with neurogenic claudication symptoms, but without evidence of bony central canal stenosis on lumbar computed tomography. He entered a trial of spinal manipulation with transient beneficial gains after seven appointments, but no durable change in neurogenic claudication. An MRI was recommended at this point which revealed grade III spinal epidural lipomatosis at the L5/S1 level.Case 2: 51-year old male patient presented to a pain management physician with radicular symptoms for a series of lumbar epidural steroid injections. He completed a series of three lumbar epidural steroid injections with only short-term benefit. A repeat MRI demonstrated the presence of grade I (borderline grade II) spinal epidural lipomatosis. Conclusions: The first case illustrates a limitation of ruling out central canal stenosis with computed tomography for patients unable to undergo an MRI. The second case demonstrates a possible association between steroid injections and spinal epidural lipomatosis. An association of this kind has not been established; further research is needed to determine the significance.


Asunto(s)
Lipomatosis/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/diagnóstico , Humanos , Lipomatosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veteranos
2.
J Chiropr Med ; 15(4): 259-271, 2016 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27857634

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this narrative review was to describe the most common spinal fusion surgical procedures, address the clinical indications for lumbar fusion in degeneration cases, identify potential complications, and discuss their relevance to chiropractic management of patients after surgical fusion. METHODS: The PubMed database was searched from the beginning of the record through March 31, 2015, for English language articles related to lumbar fusion or arthrodesis or both and their incidence, procedures, complications, and postoperative chiropractic cases. Articles were retrieved and evaluated for relevance. The bibliographies of selected articles were also reviewed. RESULTS: The most typical lumbar fusion procedures are posterior lumbar interbody fusion, anterior lumbar interbody fusion, transforaminal interbody fusion, and lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Fair level evidence supports lumbar fusion procedures for degenerative spondylolisthesis with instability and for intractable low back pain that has failed conservative care. Complications and development of chronic pain after surgery is common, and these patients frequently present to chiropractic physicians. Several reports describe the potential benefit of chiropractic management with spinal manipulation, flexion-distraction manipulation, and manipulation under anesthesia for postfusion low back pain. There are no published experimental studies related specifically to chiropractic care of postfusion low back pain. CONCLUSIONS: This article describes the indications for fusion, common surgical practice, potential complications, and relevant published chiropractic literature. This review includes 10 cases that showed positive benefits from chiropractic manipulation, flexion-distraction, and/or manipulation under anesthesia for postfusion lumbar pain. Chiropractic care may have a role in helping patients in pain who have undergone lumbar fusion surgery.

3.
Am Fam Physician ; 71(7): 1353-8, 2005 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15832538

RESUMEN

Methadone is a synthetic opioid with potent analgesic effects. Although it is associated commonly with the treatment of opioid addiction, it may be prescribed by licensed family physicians for analgesia. Methadone's unique pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics make it a valuable option in the management of cancer pain and other chronic pain, including neuropathic pain states. It may be an appropriate replacement for opioids when side effects have limited further dosage escalation. Metabolism of and response to methadone varies with each patient. Transition to methadone and dosage titration should be completed slowly and with frequent monitoring. Conversion should be based on the current daily oral morphine equivalent dosage. After starting methadone therapy or increasing the dosage, systemic toxicity may not become apparent for several days. Some medications alter the absorption or metabolism of methadone, and their concurrent use may require dosing adjustments. Methadone is less expensive than other sustained-release opioid formulations.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/farmacocinética , Metadona/administración & dosificación , Metadona/farmacocinética , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Analgésicos Opioides/economía , Enfermedad Crónica , Costos de los Medicamentos , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Humanos , Metadona/economía , Dolor/metabolismo , Equivalencia Terapéutica
5.
J Am Board Fam Pract ; 17 Suppl: S1-12, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15575025

RESUMEN

Pain is a common complaint of patients who visit a family physician, and its appropriate management is a medical mandate. The fundamental principles for pain management are: placing the patient at the center of care; adequately assessing and quantifying pain; treating pain adequately; maximizing function; accounting for culture and gender differences; identifying red and yellow flags early; understanding and differentiating tolerance, dependence and addiction; minimizing side effects; and being familiar with and using CAM therapies when good evidence of efficacy exists. The pharmacologic management of pain requires thorough knowledge of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cyclo-oxygenase-2-specific inhibitors, and opioids. A table of equianalgesic dosages is useful because patients may need to move from one opioid to another. Accompanying this article are papers discussing 5 common pain disorders seen by family physicians, including: neck pain, low back pain, joint pain, pelvic pain, and cancer/end of life pain. The family physician who learns these principles of pain management and the algorithms for these common pain disorders can serve patients well.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Médicos de Familia , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Artralgia/diagnóstico , Artralgia/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor de Espalda/diagnóstico , Dolor de Espalda/tratamiento farmacológico , Atención a la Salud , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/educación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Morfina/administración & dosificación , Morfina/uso terapéutico , Dolor de Cuello/diagnóstico , Dolor de Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Pélvico/diagnóstico , Dolor Pélvico/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores Sexuales
6.
J Am Board Fam Pract ; 17 Suppl: S32-42, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15575028

RESUMEN

Joint pain is a common problem seen by family physicians. Although many pain complaints arise from self-limited conditions, a substantial number require immediate and ongoing care. Prompt appropriate treatment can help limit symptoms, prevent disability, and improve outcomes. The differential diagnosis is varied, with both laboratory studies and diagnostic imaging available to help evaluate the joint. At the initial evaluation and at each subsequent re-evaluation, there should be efforts to identify dangerous conditions and distinguish conditions with a disease-specific pathogenesis. Treatment of joint pain consists of both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic modalities. Pharmacologic therapies may include medications specific for pain, inflammation, and adjuncts specific to the diagnosis. Treatment of pain should proceed in a step-wise fashion providing medications appropriate for treating the level of pain. Inflammation is treated with physical modalities and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory or cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors. Nonpharmacologic therapies may include protection, rest, ice, compression, elevation, and simple office procedures. Physical therapy and education can assist in the recovery process, and prevent recurrence.


Asunto(s)
Artralgia/terapia , Atención Primaria de Salud , Acetaminofén/uso terapéutico , Algoritmos , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Artralgia/diagnóstico , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Articulaciones/fisiopatología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA