Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 49(11): 763-771, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38343165

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, case series. OBJECTIVE: To identify and characterize any differences in specific patient factors, MRI findings, features of spontaneous disc resorption, and outcomes between patients with single-level and multilevel LDH. BACKGROUND: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is one of the most common spinal pathologies worldwide. Though many cases of LDH resolve by spontaneous resorption, the mechanism underlying this "self-healing" phenomenon remains poorly understood, particularly in the context of multilevel herniations. METHODS: A one-year prospective study was conducted of patients presenting with acute symptomatic LDH between 2017 and 2019. Baseline demographics, herniation characteristics, and MRI phenotypes were recorded before treatment, which consisted of gabapentin, acupuncture, and the avoidance of inflammatory-modulating medications. MRIs were performed approximately every three months after the initial evaluation to determine any differences between patients with single-level and multilevel LDH. RESULTS: Ninety patients were included, 17 demonstrated multilevel LDH. Body mass index was higher among patients with multilevel LDH ( P <0.001). Patients with multilevel LDH were more likely to exhibit L3/L4 inferior endplate defects ( P =0.001), L4/L5 superior endplate defects ( P =0.012), and L4/L5 inferior endplate defects ( P =0.020) on MRI. No other differences in MRI phenotypes ( e.g. Modic changes, osteophytes, etc .) existed between groups. Resorption rate and time to resolution did not differ between those with single-level and multilevel LDH. CONCLUSIONS: Resorption rates were similar between single-level and multilevel LDH at various time points throughout one prospective assessment, providing insights that disc healing may have unique programmed signatures. Compared with those with single-level LDH, patients with multilevel herniations were more likely to have a higher BMI, lesser initial axial and sagittal disc measurements, and endplate defects at specific lumbar levels. In addition, our findings support the use of conservative management in patients with LDH, regardless of the number of levels affected. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.


Asunto(s)
Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral , Vértebras Lumbares , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Fenotipo , Humanos , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Disco Intervertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Disco Intervertebral/patología , Anciano
2.
Eur Spine J ; 33(3): 964-973, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38099946

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We performed a prospective one-year multi-imaging study to assess the clinical outcomes and rate of disc resorption in acute lumbar disc herniation (LDH) patients undergoing inflammation-preserving treatment (i.e. no NSAIDS, steroids). METHODS: All patients received gabapentin to relieve leg pain, 12 sessions of acupuncture. Repeat MRI was performed, every 3 months, after 12 sessions of treatment continued for those without 40% reduction in herniated disc sagittal area. Disc herniations sizes were measured on sagittal T2W MRI sequences, pre-treatment and at post-treatment intervals. Patients were stratified to fast, medium, slow, and prolonged recovery groups in relation to symptom resolution and disc resorption. RESULTS: Ninety patients (51% females; mean age: 48.6 years) were assessed. Mean size of disc herniation was 119.54 ± 54.34 mm2, and the mean VAS-Leg score was 6.12 ± 1.13 at initial presentation. A total of 19 patients (21.1%) improved at the time of the repeat MRI (i.e. within first 3 months post-treatment). 100% of all patient had LDH resorption within one year (mean: 4.4. months). There was no significant difference at baseline LDH between fast, medium, slow, and prolonged resorption groups. Initial LDH size was weakly associated with degree of leg pain at baseline and initial gabapentin levels. Surgery was avoided in all cases. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to note inflammation-preserving treatment, without conventional anti-inflammatory and steroid medications, as safe and effective for patients with an acute LDH. Rate of disc resorption (100%) was higher than comparative recent meta-analysis findings (66.7%) and no patient underwent surgery.


Asunto(s)
Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/complicaciones , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Gabapentina/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Inflamación/complicaciones , Dolor/complicaciones , Esteroides
3.
JBJS Rev ; 11(1)2023 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36722839

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Resorption after lumbar disk herniation is a common yet unpredictable finding. It is hypothesized that nearly 70% of lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) undergo the resorption to a significant degree after acute herniation, which has led to nonoperative management before surgical planning. METHODS: This narrative review on the literature from 4 databases (MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, and Cochrane) examines historical and recent advancements related to disk resorption. Studies were appraised for their description of the predictive factor (e.g., imaging or morphologic factors), pathophysiology, and treatment recommendations. OBSERVATIONS: We reviewed 68 articles considering the possibility of resorption of lumbar HNP. Recent literature has proposed various mechanisms (inflammation and neovascularization, dehydration, and mechanical traction) of lumbar disk resorption; however, consensus has yet to be established. Current factors that increase the likelihood of resorption include the initial size of the herniation, sequestration, percentage of rim enhancement on initial gadolinium-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), composition of inflammatory mediators, and involvement of the posterior longitudinal ligament. CONCLUSION: Heterogeneity in imaging and morphologic factors has led to uncertainty in the identification of which lumbar herniations will resorb. Current factors that increase the likelihood of disk resorption include the initial size of the herniation, sequestration, percentage of rim enhancement on initial MRI, composition of cellular and inflammatory mediators present, and involvement of the posterior longitudinal ligament. This review article highlights the role of disk resorption after herniation without surgical intervention and questions the role of traditional noninflammatory medications after acute herniation. Further research is warranted to refine the ideal patient profile for disk resorption to ultimately avoid unnecessary treatment, thus individualizing patient care.


Asunto(s)
Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral , Humanos , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/terapia , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Región Lumbosacra
4.
Spine J ; 23(2): 247-260, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36243388

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Symptomatic lumbar disc herniations (LDH) are very common. LDH resorption may occur by a "self-healing" process, however this phenomenon remains poorly understood. By most guidelines, if LDH remains symptomatic after 3 months and conservative management fails, surgical intervention may be an option. PURPOSE: The following prospective study aimed to identify determinants that may predict early versus late LDH resorption. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Prospective study with patients recruited at a single center. PATIENT SAMPLE: Ninety-three consecutive patients diagnosed with acute symptomatic LDH were included in this study (n=23 early resorption and n=67 late resorption groups) with a mean age of 48.7±11.9 years. OUTCOMES MEASURE: Baseline assessment of patient demographics (eg, smoking status, height, weight, etc.), herniation characteristics (eg, the initial level of herniation, the direction of herniation, prevalence of multiple herniations, etc.) and MRI phenotypes (eg, Modic changes, end plate abnormalities, disc degeneration, vertebral body dimensions, etc.) were collected for further analysis. Lumbar MRIs were performed approximately every 3 months for 1 year from time of enrollment to assess disc integrity. METHODS: All patients were managed similarly. LDH resorption was classified as early (<3 months) or late (>3 months). A prediction model of pretreatment factors was constructed. RESULTS: No significant differences were noted between groups at any time-point (p>.05). Patients in the early resorption group experienced greater percent reduction of disc herniation between MRI-0-MRI-1 (p=.043), reduction of herniation size for total study duration (p=.007), and percent resorption per day compared to the late resorption group (p<.001). Based on multivariate modeling, greater L4 posterior vertebral height (coeff:14.58), greater sacral slope (coeff:0.12), and greater herniated volume (coeff:0.013) at baseline were found to be most predictive of early resorption (p<.05). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first comprehensive imaging and clinical phenotypic prospective study, to our knowledge, that has identified distinct determinants for early LDH resorption. Early resorption can occur in 24.7% of LDH patients. We developed a prediction model for early resorption which demonstrated great overall performance according to pretreatment measures of herniation size, L4 posterior body height, and sacral slope. A risk profile is proposed which may aid clinical decision-making and managing patient expectations.


Asunto(s)
Degeneración del Disco Intervertebral , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral , Humanos , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/complicaciones , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Prospectivos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Fenotipo , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
J Headache Pain ; 21(1): 126, 2020 Oct 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33109076

RESUMEN

Migraine and sleep disorders are common and often burdensome chronic conditions with a high prevalence in the general population, and with considerable socio-economic impact and costs.The existence of a relationship between migraine and sleep disorders has been recognized from centuries by clinicians and epidemiological studies. Nevertheless, the exact nature of this association, the underlying mechanisms and interactions are complex and not completely understood. Recent biochemical and functional imaging studies identified central nervous system structures and neurotransmitters involved in the pathophysiology of migraine and also important for the regulation of normal sleep architecture, suggesting a possible causative role, in the pathogenesis of both disorders, of a dysregulation in these common nervous system pathways.This systematic review summarizes the existing data on migraine and sleep disorders with the aim to evaluate the existence of a causal relationship and to assess the presence of influencing factors. The identification of specific sleep disorders associated with migraine should induce clinicians to systematically assess their presence in migraine patients and to adopt combined treatment strategies.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia , Humanos , Trastornos Migrañosos/complicaciones , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Sueño , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/complicaciones , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/epidemiología
6.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol ; 13(9): 1059-1066, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32878493

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Paracetamol is one of the most frequently used analgesics for people with low back pain, but despite its frequent use there is still debate regarding its efficacy and safety for this indication. AREAS COVERED: We describe the origin of paracetamol and its proposed mechanisms of action. We focus in on low back pain and describe the evidence it has on the efficacy of paracetamol (taken by patients orally) and current insights on its side-effects. When searching for relevant publications we focused mainly on recent Cochrane reviews and published RCTs. We found that there is increasing evidence that shows paracetamol is not more effective than placebo in patients with acute low back pain. Concerning patients with subacute and chronic back pain, the evidence for or against the efficacy of paracetamol vs placebo is lacking and would need more research. EXPERT OPINION: We argue that we still need better evidence on the efficacy of paracetamol for acute and chronic back pain. Until that evidence becomes available paracetamol should still be considered as an option for patients with back pain. However, we suggest that a strategy focusing on non-pharmacological management as the first treatment option in low back pain may be equally effective with less side effects.


Asunto(s)
Acetaminofén/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/administración & dosificación , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/tratamiento farmacológico , Acetaminofén/efectos adversos , Acetaminofén/farmacología , Dolor Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/efectos adversos , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/farmacología , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
7.
Nat Commun ; 4: 2469, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24036685

RESUMEN

The microbial community of the human gut has a crucial role in sustaining host homeostasis. High-throughput DNA sequencing has delineated the structural and functional configurations of gut metagenomes in world populations. The microbiota of the Russian population is of particular interest to researchers, because Russia encompasses a uniquely wide range of environmental conditions and ethnogeographical cohorts. Here we conduct a shotgun metagenomic analysis of gut microbiota samples from 96 healthy Russian adult subjects, which reveals novel microbial community structures. The communities from several rural regions display similarities within each region and are dominated by the bacterial taxa associated with the healthy gut. Functional analysis shows that the metabolic pathways exhibiting differential abundance in the novel types are primarily associated with the trade-off between the Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes phyla. The specific signatures of the Russian gut microbiota are likely linked to the host diet, cultural habits and socioeconomic status.


Asunto(s)
Tracto Gastrointestinal/microbiología , Microbiota , Población Rural , Población Urbana , Adulto , Análisis por Conglomerados , Dinamarca , Femenino , Geografía , Humanos , Masculino , Metabolismo , Metagenoma/genética , Microbiota/genética , Federación de Rusia , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA