RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We compared and evaluated the differences between two models for treating bilateral breast cancer (BBC): (i) dose-volume-based intensity-modulated radiation treatment (DV plan), and (ii) dose-volume-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy with generalised equivalent uniform dose-based optimisation (DV-gEUD plan). METHODS: The quality and performance of the DV plan and DV-gEUD plan using the Pinnacle(3) system (Philips, Fitchburg, WI) were evaluated and compared in 10 patients with stage T2-T4 BBC. The plans were delivered on a Varian 21EX linear accelerator (Varian Medical Systems, Milpitas, CA) equipped with a Millennium 120 leaf multileaf collimator (Varian Medical Systems). The parameters analysed included the conformity index, homogeneity index, tumour control probability of the planning target volume (PTV), the volumes V(20 Gy) and V(30 Gy) of the organs at risk (OAR, including the heart and lungs), mean dose and the normal tissue complication probability. RESULTS: Both plans met the requirements for the coverage of PTV with similar conformity and homogeneity indices. However, the DV-gEUD plan had the advantage of dose sparing for OAR: the mean doses of the heart and lungs, lung V(20) (Gy), and heart V(30) (Gy) in the DV-gEUD plan were lower than those in the DV plan (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A better result can be obtained by starting with a DV-generated plan and then improving it by adding gEUD-based improvements to reduce the number of iterations and to improve the optimum dose distribution. Advances to knowledge The DV-gEUD plan provided superior dosimetric results for treating BBC in terms of PTV coverage and OAR sparing than the DV plan, without sacrificing the homogeneity of dose distribution in the PTV.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIMS: To compare the performance of volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) by dual arc with fixed beam intensity-modulated radiotherapies (IMRTs) and single arc VMAT on nasopharyngeal carcinomas (NPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty NPC cases were re-planned using the planning system of the Pinnacle(3®)SmartArc (SA) module to compare the performance of the following four techniques: seven-field (7F) and 18-field (18F) fixed beam IMRT, and single (SA(1)) and dual arc VMAT (SA(2)). The plan was delivered on an Elekta Synergy™ Linac equipped with an 80-leaf 1cm multileaf collimator. Three dose levels of planning target volumes (PTVs) with 70/59.4/54.0Gy in 33 fractions were prescribed and delivered as a simultaneous integrated boost. The conformity index and homogeneity index of the PTVs, the comprehensive quality index (CQI), the normal tissue complication probability for the organs at risk (OARs), and the planning time, delivery efficiency and accuracy were analysed. RESULTS: A significantly inferior conformity index at the three dose levels of PTV and homogeneity index of PTV(70) were observed in SA(1) compared with the other techniques. Comparable conformity index and homogeneity index of the PTV were observed among 7F/18F IMRT and SA(2). Based on the CQI of the 11 OARs, the most efficient dose reduction was observed in 18F IMRT followed in order by SA(2), 7F IMRT and SA(1). The planning time was on average 13.2/24.9/40.1/42.8min for 7F/18F IMRT/SA(1)/SA(2), respectively. With regards to the delivery efficiency compared with 7F IMRT, a 51 and 41% reduction in delivery time was achieved by SA(1) and SA(2), respectively. All techniques presented a high quality assurance pass rate (>98%) of the Γ(3mm,3%) criterion. CONCLUSION: In NPC cases, SA(2) gave superior results in terms of PTV coverage and OAR sparing compared with SA(1) and approached the performance achieved by 18F IMRT, but without sacrificing the delivery efficiency.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the degree of radiation-induced trismus after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). From 2003 to 2004, 17 non-metastatic NPC patients treated with parotid-sparing IMRT were enrolled. The maximal interincisal distance (MID) was measured to represent the maximum mouth opening. All 17 patients had both pre- and post-IMRT measurements taken, and the normalized MID (post-IMRT MID/pre-IMRT MID) was analysed to evaluate the percentage decrease in MID after IMRT. The median follow-up time was 20.5 months. One patient had nodal failure and was successfully salvaged with radiotherapy. All 17 patients were alive without cancer at the last follow-up. The average MID before IMRT was 46.2 mm (standard deviation (SD), 8.6 mm). The average MID at 12 months post-IMRT was 45.4 mm (SD, 8.9 mm). The averages of normalized MID were 94% (SD, 3.9%) at 5 months post-IMRT and 98.1% (SD, 4.2%) at 12 months post-IMRT. Based on the satisfactory preservation of normalized MID (average of 98.1% at 12 months post-IMRT), we demonstrate that IMRT reduces radiation-induced trismus in NPC patients. The recovery of normalized MID exists in the period from 5-12 months post-IMRT.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The ability of cells to rejoin DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) usually correlates with their radiosensitivity. This correlation has been demonstrated in radiosensitive cells, including the Chinese hamster ovary mutant XRS-5. XRS-5 is defective in a DNA end-binding protein, Ku80, which is a component of a DNA-dependent protein kinase complex used for joining strand breaks. However, Ku80-deficient cells are known to be retarded in cell proliferation and growth as well as other yet to be identified defects. Using custom-made 600-gene cDNA microarray filters, we found differential gene expressions between the wild-type and XRS-5 cells. Defective Ku80 apparently affects the expression of several repair genes, including topoisomerase-I and -IIA, ERCC5, MLH1, and ATM. In contrast, other DNA repair-associated genes, such as GADD45A, EGR1 MDM2 and p53, were not affected. In addition, for large numbers of growth-associated genes, such as cyclins and clks, the growth factors and cytokines were also affected. Down-regulated expression was also found in several categories of seemingly unrelated genes, including apoptosis, angiogenesis, kinase and signaling, phosphatase, stress protein, proto-oncogenes and tumor suppressors, transcription and translation factors. A RT-PCR analysis confirmed that the XRS-5 cells used were defective in Ku80 expression. The diversified groups of genes being affected could mean that Ku80, a multi-functional DNA-binding protein, not only affects DNA repair, but is also involved in transcription regulation. Our data, taken together, indicate that there are specific genes being modulated in Ku80- deficient cells, and that some of the DNA repair pathways and other biological functions are apparently linked, suggesting that a defect in one gene could have global effects on many other processes.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)