RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate preoperative radiochemotherapy combined with regional pelvic hyperthermia in patients with nonresectable cervical cancer >/= International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) IIB "bulky" in a Phase II study. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-two patients with nonresectable FIGO IIB-IVA cervical cancer confined to the pelvis were treated with radiochemotherapy (5 x 1.8 Gy/wk, 45-50.4 Gy; cisplatin, 40 mg/m2/wk) and weekly regional pelvic hyperthermia (SIGMA-60 applicator, system BSD-2000; BSD Medical Corp., Salt Lake City, UT). Responders underwent hysterectomy if possible, whereas patients still unresectable received definitive hyperthermic radiochemotherapy. Feasibility, toxicity, as well as response and resectability, local progression free- and overall survival rates, were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty of 32 patients completed treatment. Grade III/IV toxicities (National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria) were diarrhea (n = 5), weight loss >10 kg (n = 4), and nausea (n = 2). Twenty-four of 32 patients (75%) achieved a partial remission after 45-50 Gy, and 20 patients underwent hysterectomy (18 patients, R0; 8 patients pCR). Three-year overall survival was 60%, with moderate (13%) rates of severe late toxicity. R0-resected patients had a favorable chronic toxicity profile and an excellent prognosis (3-year survival rate: 93%). Response depended on thermal parameters (vaginal reference point), whereas response, R0-resection, and FIGO stage are significant prognostic factors for survival. CONCLUSION: Preoperative hyperthermic radiochemotherapy (45-50 Gy) induces high response rates and enables curative surgery in a high proportion of patients with nonresectable cervical cancer. Therefore, the use of hyperthermia in conjunction with standard chemo-/radiotherapy +/- surgery may allow for more effective tumor treatment while decreasing the risk of complications in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/métodos , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Hipertermia Inducida/métodos , Histerectomía/métodos , Radioterapia de Alta Energía/métodos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pelvis , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The application of induction chemotherapy failed to provide a consistent benefit for local control in primary treatment of advanced head and neck (H&N) cancers. The aim of this study was to compare the results of concomitant application of radiochemotherapy for treating locally advanced head-and-neck carcinoma in comparison with the former standard of sequential radiochemotherapy. METHODS: Between 1987 and 1995 we treated 122 patients with unresectable (stage IV head and neck) cancer by two different protocols. The sequential protocol (SEQ; 1987-1992) started with two courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin [CDDP] + 120-h continuous infusions (c.i.) of folinic acid [FA] and 5-fluorouracil [5-FU]), followed by a course of radiochemotherapy using conventional fractionation up to 70 Gy. The concomitant protocol (CON; since 1993) combined two courses of FA/5-FU c.i. plus mitomycin (MMC) concomitantly with a course of radiotherapy up to 30 Gy in conventional fractionation, followed by a hyperfractionated course up to 72 Gy. Results from the two groups were compared. RESULTS: Patient and tumor characteristics were balanced (SEQ = 70, CON = 52 pts.). Mean radiation dose achieved (65.3 Gy vs. 71.6 Gy, p = 0.00), response rates (67 vs. 90 % for primary, p = 0.02), and local control (LC; 17.6% vs. 41%, p = 0.03), were significantly lower in the SEQ group, revealing a trend towards lower disease-specific (DSS; 19.8% vs. 31.4%, p = 0.08) and overall (14.7% vs. 23.7%, p = 0.11) survival rates after 5 years. Mucositis grades III and IV prevailed in the CON group (54% versus 44%). Late toxicity was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Concurrent chemotherapy seemed more effective in treating head and neck tumors than induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation, resulting in better local control and a trend towards improved survival.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Terapia Combinada , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/mortalidad , Humanos , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
To implement noninvasive thermometry, we installed a hybrid system consisting of a radiofrequency multiantenna applicator (SIGMA-Eye) for deep hyperthermia (BSD-2000/3D) integrated into the gantry of a 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance (MR) tomograph Symphony. This system can record MR data during radiofrequency heating and is suitable for application and evaluation of methods for MR thermography. In 15 patients with preirradiated pelvic rectal recurrences, we acquired phase data sets (25 slices) every 10 to 15 minutes over the treatment time (60-90 minutes) using gradient echo sequences (echo time = 20 ms), transformed the phase differences to MR temperatures, and fused the color-coded MR-temperature distributions with anatomic T1-weighted MR data sets. We could generate one complete series of MR data sets per patient with satisfactory quality for further analysis. In fat, muscle, water bolus, prostate, bladder, and tumor, we delineated regions of interest (ROI), used the fat ROI for drift correction by transforming these regions to a phase shift zero, and evaluated the MR-temperature frequency distributions. Mean MR temperatures (T(MR)), maximum T(MR), full width half maximum (FWHM), and other descriptors of tumors and normal tissues were noninvasively derived and their dependencies outlined. In 8 of 15 patients, direct temperature measurements in reference points were available. We correlated the tumor MR temperatures with direct measurements, clinical response, and tumor features (volume and location), and found reasonable trends and correlations. Therefore, the mean T(MR) of the tumor might be useful as a variable to evaluate the quality and effectivity of heat treatments, and consequently as optimization variable. Feasibility of noninvasive MR thermography for regional hyperthermia has been shown and should be further investigated.
Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Recto/diagnóstico , Termografía/métodos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Capecitabina , Terapia Combinada , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Hipertermia Inducida/métodos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/métodos , Masculino , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Compuestos Organoplatinos/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino , Neoplasias del Recto/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia , TemperaturaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Dose escalated three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with 70 Gy against glioblastomas was compared retrospectively with the standard scheme of 60 Gy using 2-D-planning. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the period from 1994 to 1998, a series of 135 patients with glioblastomas was treated by surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. A conversion from 2-D into 3-D-planning was carried out in 4/1996. The prescribed total dose for the first 65 patients was 60 Gy (group 60). A boost up to 70 Gy was added for the remaining 70 patients (group 70). RESULTS: The median survival time was 8.0 months for group 60 and 8.3 months for group 70. A dependency on the applied dose range was found. The median survival time was 3 months for patients who received a radiation dose of 55 Gy or less, 8.6 months for doses between 56 and 65 Gy, and 9.6 months for patients with a dose between 66 and 75 Gy (p < 0.01). In a multivariate analysis only the performance status maintained significance (p = 0.02) as a prognostic factor, while the dose range reached borderline significance (p = 0.09). CONCLUSION: No statistically significant survival prolongation was reached despite a dose escalation to 70 Gy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Glioblastoma/mortalidad , Glioblastoma/radioterapia , Traumatismos por Radiación/mortalidad , Radioterapia Conformacional/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Comorbilidad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sobrevida , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Since long-term results of the standard treatment of locally advanced or recurrent prostatic carcinoma are unsatisfactory, the role for additional regional hyperthermia was evaluated in a phase I/II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 08/1996 to 03/2000, 22 patients were treated by a standard irradiation regimen (68.4 Gy) in combination with regional hyperthermia (weekly, five to six times), and five of 22 patients received short-term (neoadjuvant) hormonal treatment. Of these, 15 patients had primary prostatic carcinoma T3 pN0 M0 and seven a histologically confirmed local recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Feasibility of hyperthermia, and acute/late toxicity as well as long-term follow-up (prostate- specific antigen [PSA] control, overall survival) were analyzed. Clinical endpoints were correlated with thermal parameters. RESULTS: Mean maximum temperatures along the urethra of 41.4 degrees C (41.0 degrees C for the recurrences), and mean T(90) values of 40.7 degrees C could be achieved. Severe acute toxicity of grade 3 occurred at the rectum in three, at the urethra in four, at the intestine in one, and a burn induced by hyperthermia in one of 22 patients. Late toxicity was only observed rectally in one patient (grade 3) and at the urethra in two patients (grade 2). There was no correlation between thermal parameters and any toxicity. The survival curves showed a PSA control for primary prostatic carcinoma > 50% after 6 years, but no long-term PSA control for the recurrences. Overall survival after 6 years was 95% for primary carcinoma, and 60% for the recurrences. There was a clear correlation between higher temperatures or thermal doses with long-term PSA control. CONCLUSION: Regional hyperthermia might be a low-toxicity approach to increase PSA control of common treatment schedules. Further evaluation, in particular employing improved hyperthermia technology, is worthwhile.
Asunto(s)
Hipertermia Inducida , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Anciano , Terapia Combinada , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hipertermia Inducida/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Próstata/patología , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To assess acute as well as long-term toxicity after permanent prostate seed implantation. To find predictive clinical or dosimetric factors for side effects in order to work out strategies for improvement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A group of 174 patients with localised prostate cancer was treated with permanent seed implantation between 1999 and 2001, either alone (140 patients) or in combination with external radiotherapy (34 patients). For the majority (114/174, i.e. 66%) a CT was performed four weeks after implantation and analysed in the planning system VariSeed. In the postimplant analysis, dosimetric descriptors (doses, volumes) were determined for the prostate and rectum and compared with the intraoperative values. In addition, a questionnaire was sent to all patients to assess and quantify acute and chronic toxicity (urinary, rectal, sexual) and the impact on subjective acceptance and quality of life (return rate of questionnaires 83%). The derived score changes were correlated with clinical and dosimetric factors. RESULTS: In the mono-brachytherapy group 14% (16/140) required a bladder catheter, of them 8% (9/140) with a manifest urinary obstruction. Long-term rectal toxicity (<5%) and impairment of potency (<30%) are moderate and obviously below other treatment options. Urinary toxicity is dominant with an overall long-term dysuria up to 30% (at a mean observation interval of ten months), and a significant trend to decline with follow-up time. Conversely, the erectile function tends to deteriorate with follow-up time. Nevertheless, quality of life is not significantly reduced and acceptance is high. Our analysis suggests that the main factor for urinary toxicity and impaired erectile function is the dose load to larger portions of the prostate (D(50)>240 Gy), which appears to be attributed to unnecessarily high numbers of seeds (for a fixed activity per seed) and needles. The rectal toxicity is correlated with the high dose regions in the rectum (>/=145 Gy). Urinary toxicity is lower for combined-brachytherapy, while rectal toxicity and impairment of potency are slightly higher. CONCLUSIONS: Toxicity spectrum and quality of life after permanent seed implantation for early prostate cancer are acceptable for nearly all patients (98%). To further improve tolerance we should attempt to achieve a better dose homogeneity, i.e. by reducing D(50). Therefore, special attention should be given to D(50) during the real-time planning process. The necessity of more homogeneous dose distributions might imply a reduction of the activity per seed, e.g. from 0.7 mCi down to 0.6 mCi.