Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 56(3): 1129-1135, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37646969

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To study the efficacy and safety of peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter removal using the pull technique. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 36 patients in whom the pull technique was used to remove a PD catheter. We evaluated the efficacy, safety, and health economic benefits of this technique by analyzing the pain score, duration of the procedure, complications during or after the procedure, and cost. RESULTS: The mean age (± standard deviation) of the 36 patients was 51 ± 14 years involving 27 males and 9 females with a mean body mass index was 23.4 ± 2.6. The mean duration of PD was 28 months (range 4-96 months). The site of the pull technique for peritoneal dialysis catheter removal was at the bedside or in the treatment room, with local anesthesia or no anesthesia. The mean duration of the procedure (from anesthesia to complete removal of the PD catheter) was 5-15 min. Only one patient experienced catheter rupture and no patients developed procedural or post-procedural bleeding or abdominal wall leakage. Infection did not occur at the inner or outer cuffs, tunnel, or outlet. Pain scores analyzed by a 10-point visual analogue scoring technique both immediately and 24 h after the procedure were 3.5 ± 1.7 and 1.2 ± 0.8, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The pull technique is simple to perform, takes a short time, results in few complications and small wounds, causes only mild pain, enables fast recovery, and results in low medical costs.


Asunto(s)
Catéteres de Permanencia , Diálisis Peritoneal , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cateterismo/métodos , Diálisis Peritoneal/métodos , Dolor
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA