Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

GOALS: We sought to determine the efficacy of gabapentin in the treatment of functional dyspepsia among an observational cohort of patients. BACKGROUND: Gabapentin has an established role in the treatment of neuropathic pain, with evidence supporting a benefit in visceral hypersensitivity. There is currently no data on the use of gabapentin for the treatment of functional dyspepsia. STUDY: Consecutive patients presenting to a tertiary motility clinic for the evaluation of functional dyspepsia without concurrent gastric emptying delay completed a baseline Patient Assessment of Gastrointestinal Disorders-Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM) before evaluation and were started on gabapentin for functional dyspepsia by their providers. The primary endpoint was change in total PAGI-SYM score between initial and subsequent visits. RESULTS: Of 110 patients enrolled, 62 patients with functional dyspepsia completed pregabapentin and postgabapentin surveys. Subjects' mean PAGI-SYM score decreased by 0.44 (P<0.0001) with significant changes in all subscales (including upper abdominal pain, lower abdominal pain, postprandial fullness) except for bloating. Multivariable analysis showed that worsening pretreatment symptom severity was independently associated with improvement. Seven (11.3%) patients discontinued gabapentin with 5 (71.4%) discontinuing due to side effects. Using the minimum significant PAGI-SYM score change threshold, ≥50% of the cohort had significant improvement in their overall, postprandial fullness, and upper abdominal pain subscores. CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective, open-label cohort of patients treated with gabapentin for functional dyspepsia, there were significant improvements in dyspeptic symptoms interpreted within the limitations of an open-label study design. Further studies are needed to place gabapentin in the functional dyspepsia treatment algorithm.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123861.].

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) and Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) can profoundly affect quality of life and are influenced by stress and resiliency. The impact of mind-body interventions (MBIs) on IBS and IBD patients has not previously been examined. METHODS: Nineteen IBS and 29 IBD patients were enrolled in a 9-week relaxation response based mind-body group intervention (RR-MBI), focusing on elicitation of the RR and cognitive skill building. Symptom questionnaires and inflammatory markers were assessed pre- and post-intervention, and at short-term follow-up. Peripheral blood transcriptome analysis was performed to identify genomic correlates of the RR-MBI. RESULTS: Pain Catastrophizing Scale scores improved significantly post-intervention for IBD and at short-term follow-up for IBS and IBD. Trait Anxiety scores, IBS Quality of Life, IBS Symptom Severity Index, and IBD Questionnaire scores improved significantly post-intervention and at short-term follow-up for IBS and IBD, respectively. RR-MBI altered expression of more genes in IBD (1059 genes) than in IBS (119 genes). In IBD, reduced expression of RR-MBI response genes was most significantly linked to inflammatory response, cell growth, proliferation, and oxidative stress-related pathways. In IBS, cell cycle regulation and DNA damage related gene sets were significantly upregulated after RR-MBI. Interactive network analysis of RR-affected pathways identified TNF, AKT and NF-κB as top focus molecules in IBS, while in IBD kinases (e.g. MAPK, P38 MAPK), inflammation (e.g. VEGF-C, NF-κB) and cell cycle and proliferation (e.g. UBC, APP) related genes emerged as top focus molecules. CONCLUSIONS: In this uncontrolled pilot study, participation in an RR-MBI was associated with improvements in disease-specific measures, trait anxiety, and pain catastrophizing in IBS and IBD patients. Moreover, observed gene expression changes suggest that NF-κB is a target focus molecule in both IBS and IBD-and that its regulation may contribute to counteracting the harmful effects of stress in both diseases. Larger, controlled studies are needed to confirm this preliminary finding. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT02136745.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) is an idiopathic functional gastrointestinal disorder that has been underrecognized in the adult population. Nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain are common presentations to gastrointestinal nursing. There are multiple differential diagnoses the clinician must consider prior to a diagnosis of CVS to recognize the disorder. CVS occurs in 4 phases: (a) interepisodic, (b) prodromal, (c) vomiting, and (d) recovery. Each phase has specific treatment guidelines. There is no specific "cure" for CVS; proper management is key. Increasing awareness of CVS is paramount to its detection. CVS has been examined in the pediatric population and has often been considered a pediatric disorder. More recently, it has come to be recognized in the adult population. Proper care and management of these patients allow for better support for patients and their families who are often on the primary caregivers. Nurses are often on the front lines of care and knowledge of CVS from the beginning should lead to shortened hospital stays and optimal patient care.

Asunto(s)