RESUMEN

The management of cardiogenic shock is an ongoing challenge. Despite all efforts and tremendous use of resources, mortality remains high. Whilst reversing the underlying cause, restoring/maintaining organ perfusion and function are cornerstones of management. The presence of comorbidities and preexisting organ dysfunction increases management complexity, aiming to integrate the needs of vital organs in each individual patient. This review provides a comprehensive overview of contemporary literature regarding the definition and classification of cardiogenic shock, its pathophysiology, diagnosis, laboratory evaluation, and monitoring. Further, we distill the latest evidence in pharmacologic therapy and the use of mechanical circulatory support including recently published randomized-controlled trials as well as future directions of research, integrating this within an international group of authors to provide a global perspective. Finally, we explore the need for individualization, especially in the face of neutral randomized trials which may be related to a dilution of a potential benefit of an intervention (i.e., average effect) in this heterogeneous clinical syndrome, including the use of novel biomarkers, artificial intelligence, and machine learning approaches to identify specific endotypes of cardiogenic shock (i.e., subclasses with distinct underlying biological/molecular mechanisms) to support a more personalized medicine beyond the syndromic approach of cardiogenic shock.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The optimal revascularization strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), cardiogenic shock (CS), and multivessel disease remains controversial. The CULPRIT-SHOCK trial compared culprit-lesion-only versus immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), providing important data but leaving efficacy questions unresolved. To address lingering uncertainties and gain deeper insights, we performed a Bayesian reanalysis of the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial data. METHODS: We conducted a Bayesian re-analysis of the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial data using non-informative, skeptical, and enthusiastic priors. Relative risks (RR) with 95% highest posterior density intervals were calculated. We defined the Minimally Clinically Important Difference (MCID) as RR <0.84. We performed subgroup analyses for key patient characteristics and assessed secondary outcomes and safety endpoints. Probabilities of benefit, achieving MCID, and harm were computed. Results are presented as median RR with probabilities of effect sizes. RESULTS: Bayesian re-analysis showed a median relative risk of 0.82 (95% HPD: 0.66-1.04) with a non-informative prior, indicating a 95% probability of benefit and 59% probability of achieving MCID. Subgroup analyses revealed potentially stronger effects in males (RR: 0.78, 73% probability of MCID), patients without diabetes (RR: 0.76, 79% probability of MCID), and those with non-anterior STEMI (RR: 0.74, 76% probability of MCID). Secondary outcomes suggested potential benefits in mortality (RR: 0.85) and need for renal replacement therapy (RR: 0.72), but increased risks of recurrent MI (RR: 2.84) and urgent revascularization (RR: 2.88). CONCLUSION: Our Bayesian reanalysis provides intuitive insights by quantifying probabilities of treatment effect sizes, offering further evidence favoring the culprit-lesion-only PCI strategy in AMI patients with cardiogenic shock and multivessel disease. The analysis demonstrates a high probability of overall benefit, with a notable chance of achieving a minimally clinically important difference, particularly in specific subgroups. These findings not only support the consideration of culprit-lesion-only PCI in certain patient populations but also underscore the need for careful risk-benefit assessment. Furthermore, our hypothesis-generating subgroup analyses, which show varying probabilities of achieving MCID, illuminate promising avenues for future targeted investigations in this critical patient population.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The extent to which infarct artery impacts the extent of myocardial injury and outcomes in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention is uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a pooled analysis using individual patient data from 7 randomized STEMI trials in which myocardial injury within 30 days after primary percutaneous coronary intervention was assessed in 1774 patients by cardiac magnetic resonance (n=1318) or technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography (n=456). Clinical follow-up was performed at a median duration of 351 days (interquartile range, 184-368 days). Infarct size and outcomes were assessed in anterior (infarct vessel=left anterior descending) versus nonanterior (non-left anterior descending) STEMI. Median infarct size (percentage left ventricular myocardial mass) was larger in patients with anterior compared with nonanterior STEMI (19.7% [interquartile range, 9.4%-31.7%] versus 12.6% [interquartile range, 5.1%-20.5%]; P<0.001). Patients with anterior compared with nonanterior STEMI were at higher risk for 1-year all-cause mortality (6.2% versus 3.6%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.66 [95% CI, 1.02-2.69]; P=0.04) and heart failure hospitalization (4.4% versus 2.6%; adjusted HR, 1.96 [95% CI, 1.15-3.36]; P=0.01). Infarct size was a predictor of subsequent all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization in anterior STEMI (adjusted HR per 1% increase, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.03-1.07]; P<0.001), but not in nonanterior STEMI (adjusted HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.99-1.05]; P=0.19). The P value for this interaction was 0.04. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior STEMI was associated with substantially greater myonecrosis after primary percutaneous coronary intervention compared with nonanterior STEMI, contributing in large part to the worse prognosis in patients with anterior infarction.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objectives: CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) can improve the specificity of coronary CT-angiography (cCTA) for ruling out relevant coronary artery disease (CAD) prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, little is known about the reproducibility of CT-FFR and the influence of diffuse coronary artery calcifications or segment location. The objective was to assess the reliability of machine-learning (ML)-based CT-FFR prior to TAVR in patients without obstructive CAD and to assess the influence of image quality, coronary artery calcium score (CAC), and the location of measurement within the coronary tree. Methods: Patients assessed for TAVR, without obstructive CAD on cCTA were evaluated with ML-based CT-FFR by two observers with differing experience. Differences in absolute values and categorization into hemodynamically relevant CAD (CT-FFR ≤ 0.80) were compared. Results in regard to CAD were also compared against invasive coronary angiography. The influence of segment location, image quality, and CAC was evaluated. Results: Of the screened patients, 109/388 patients did not have obstructive CAD on cCTA and were included. The median (interquartile range) difference of CT-FFR values was -0.005 (-0.09 to 0.04) (p = 0.47). Differences were smaller with high values. Recategorizations were more frequent in distal segments. Diagnostic accuracy of CT-FFR between both observers was comparable (proximal: Δ0.2%; distal: Δ0.5%) but was lower in distal segments (proximal: 98.9%/99.1%; distal: 81.1%/81.6%). Image quality and CAC had no clinically relevant influence on CT-FFR. Conclusions: ML-based CT-FFR evaluation of proximal segments was more reliable. Distal segments with CT-FFR values close to the given threshold were prone to recategorization, even if absolute differences between observers were minimal and independent of image quality or CAC.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few data are available on long-term drug therapy and its potential prognostic impact after Takotsubo syndrome (TTS). Aim of the study is to evaluate clinical characteristics and long-term outcome of TTS patients on Renin Angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi). METHODS: TTS patients were enrolled in the international multicenter GEIST (GErman Italian Spanish Takotsubo) registry. Median follow-up was 31 (Interquartile range 12-56) months. Comparison of RASi treated vs. untreated patients was performed within the overall population and after 1:1 propensity score matching for age, sex, comorbidities, type of trigger and in-hospital complications. REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04361994, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04361994 RESULTS: Of the 2453 TTS patients discharged alive, 1683 (68%) received RASi therapy. Patients with RASi were older (age 71±11 vs 69±13 years, p=0.01), with higher prevalence of hypertension (74%vs53%, p<0.01) and diabetes (19%vs15%, p=0.01), higher admission left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (41±11% vs 39±12%, p<0.01) and lower rates of in-hospital complications (18.9% vs 29.6%, p<0.01). At multivariable analysis, RASi therapy at discharge was independently associated with lower mortality (HR 0.63, 95%CI 0.45-0.87, p<0.01). Survival analysis showed that at long term, patients treated with RASi had lower mortality rates in the overall cohort (log-rank p=0.001). However, this benefit was not found among patients treated with RASi in the matched cohort (log-rank p=0.168). Potential survival benefit of RASi were present, both in the overall and matched cohort, in two subgroups: patients with admission LVEF ≤40% (HR 0.54 95%CI 0.38-0.78, p=0.001; HR 0.59, 95%CI 0.37-0.95, p=0.030) and diabetes (HR 0.41, 95%CI 0.23-0.73, p= 0.002; HR 0.41, 95%CI 0.21-0.82, p=0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term therapy with RASi after a TTS episode was not associated with lower mortality rates at propensity score analysis. However, potential survival benefit can be found among patients with admission LVEF ≤40% or diabetes.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous active mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices are being increasingly used in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock (AMICS) despite conflicting evidence regarding their effect on mortality. We aimed to ascertain the effect of early routine active percutaneous MCS versus control treatment on 6-month all-cause mortality in patients with AMICS. METHODS: In this individual patient data meta-analysis, randomised controlled trials of potential interest were identified, without language restriction, by querying the electronic databases MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase, as well as ClinicalTrials.gov, up to Jan 26, 2024. All randomised trials with 6-month mortality data comparing early routine active MCS (directly in the catheterisation laboratory after randomisation) versus control in patients with AMICS were included. The primary outcome was 6-month all-cause mortality in patients with AMICS treated with early routine active percutaneous MCS versus control, with a focus on device type (loading, such as venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [VA-ECMO] vs unloading) and patient selection. Hazard ratios (HRs) of the primary outcome measure were calculated using Cox regression models. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024504295. FINDINGS: Nine reports of randomised controlled trials (n=1114 patients) were evaluated in detail. Overall, four randomised controlled trials (n=611 patients) compared VA-ECMO with a control treatment and five randomised controlled trials (n=503 patients) compared left ventricular unloading devices with a control treatment. Two randomised controlled trials also included patients who did not have AMICS, who were excluded (55 patients [44 who were treated with VA-ECMO and 11 who were treated with a left ventricular unloading device]). The median patient age was 65 years (IQR 57-73); 845 (79·9%) of 1058 patients with data were male and 213 (20·1%) were female. No significant benefit of early unselected MCS use on 6-month mortality was noted (HR 0·87 [95% CI 0·74-1·03]; p=0·10). No significant differences were observed for left ventricular unloading devices versus control (0·80 [0·62-1·02]; p=0·075), and loading devices also had no effect on mortality (0·93 [0·75-1·17]; p=0·55). Patients with ST-elevation cardiogenic shock without risk of hypoxic brain injury had a reduction in mortality with MCS use (0·77 [0·61-0·97]; p=0·024). Major bleeding (odds ratio 2·64 [95% CI 1·91-3·65]) and vascular complications (4·43 [2·37-8·26]) were more frequent with MCS use than with control. INTERPRETATION: The use of active MCS devices in patients with AMICS did not reduce 6-month mortality (regardless of the device used) and increased major bleeding and vascular complications. However, patients with ST-elevation cardiogenic shock without risk of hypoxic brain injury had a reduction in mortality after MCS use. Therefore, the use of MCS should be restricted to certain patients only. FUNDING: The Heart Center Leipzig at Leipzig University and the Foundation Institut für Herzinfarktforschung.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors are recommended in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) for bailout treatment in case of angiographic microvascular obstruction (MVO), also termed no-reflow phenomenon, after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with, however, lacking evidence (class IIa, level C). METHODS: The investigator-initiated, international, multicenter REVERSE-FLOW trial randomized 120 patients with AMI and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade ≤2 after primary PCI to optimal medical therapy with or without GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor. The primary endpoint was infarct size (%LV) assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Secondary endpoints included CMR-derived MVO and 30-day adverse clinical events. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02739711. RESULTS: The population was predominantly male (76.7%) with a median age of 66 years and ST-elevation myocardial infarction in 73.3% of patients. Clinical and angiographic characteristics were well balanced between the cohorts. Patients in the treatment group (n=62) received eptifibatide (n=41) or tirofiban (n=21). Infarct size assessed by CMR imaging was similar in both study groups (25.4% of left ventricular mass [LV] vs. 25.2%LV; p=0.386). However, the number of patients with evidence of CMR-derived MVO (74.5% vs. 92.2%; p=0.017) and the extent of MVO (2.1%LV vs. 3.4%LV; p=0.025) were significantly reduced in the GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor group compared to controls. Thirty-day outcome showed an increased bleeding risk after GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor administration restricted to non-life-threatening bleedings (22.6% vs. 6.9%; p=0.016) without differences in all-cause mortality (4.8% vs. 3.4%; p=0.703). CONCLUSIONS: Bailout GP IIb/IIIa inhibition in AMI patients with angiographic MVO failed to reduce the primary endpoint infarct size but decreased CMR-derived MVO and led to an increase in non-fatal bleeding events.

RESUMEN

AIMS: In a recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, routine use of veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) did not improve outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS), while a microaxial flow pump reduced mortality in a selected group of patients with AMI-CS in the DanGer-Shock trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: Individual patient data of patients included in four randomized clinical trials investigating the routine use of VA-ECMO in AMI-CS were centrally analysed. For the purpose of this sub-analysis, DanGer-Shock-like patients were analysed (STEMI only, presumed low likelihood of brain injury). The primary endpoint was 180-day all-cause mortality. A total of 202 patients (106 randomized to VA-ECMO and 96 to control) were included. There were no differences in baseline characteristics, angiographic and interventional features between the two groups. Mortality after 6 months was numerically lower with VA-ECMO between the groups [45% in VA-ECMO group vs. 51% in control group; hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.56-1.26], while major bleeding (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.08-4.64) and peripheral vascular complications (OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 1.15-11.56) were increased with the use of VA-ECMO. CONCLUSION: In this exploratory subgroup analysis in patients with CS, STEMI, and a low likelihood of brain injury, there was no mortality benefit with the routine use of VA-ECMO. However, as indicated by the large confidence intervals, the statistical power was limited to draw definite conclusions.

RESUMEN

Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) has been increasingly used in the treatment of severe infarct-related cardiogenic shock in the last decade. The randomised ECLS-SHOCK trial demonstrated no benefit of early routine use on 30-day all-cause death. We herein present mid-term results. At 1-year follow-up, there were no significant differences in all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, neurologic outcome, recurrent myocardial infarction, repeat revascularisation and rehospitalisations for heart failure between ECLS and usual medical care.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Supersaturated oxygen (SSO2) delivered into the left anterior descending coronary artery after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been shown to reduce infarct size, but its effects on microvascular obstruction (MVO) are unknown. The aim of this study was to compare MVO in patients with anterior STEMI treated with SSO2 after successful primary PCI from 2 studies (the optimized SSO2 pilot and IC-HOT) with similar patients from 7 randomized trials who underwent primary PCI without SSO2 treatment. Methods: A total of 874 patients with anterior STEMI who underwent MVO assessment using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging within 10 days after primary PCI were included, of whom 90 patients (10.3%) were treated with SSO2. The primary end point was the extent of MVO as a continuous measure in a weighted multivariable model. The secondary end point was the presence of MVO. Results: SSO2 therapy was independently associated with a lower extent of MVO compared with no SSO2 therapy (coefficient, -1.35; 95% CI, -2.58 to -0.11; P = .03). SSO2 therapy was also associated with a borderline lower risk of any MVO (adjusted odds ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.31-1.00; P = .051). Conclusions: In the present individual patient data pooled analysis from 9 studies, SSO2 therapy was associated with less MVO after successful primary PCI for anterior STEMI.

RESUMEN

AIMS: Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) are increasingly used to treat patients with significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR). The evolution of concurrent mitral regurgitation (MR) severity after TTVI is currently unknown and may be pivotal for clinical decision-making. The aim of this study was to assess the evolution of MR after TTVI and to identify predictors of MR worsening and improvement. METHODS AND RESULTS: This analysis is a substudy of the Trivalve Registry, an international registry designed to collect data on TTVI. This substudy included all patients with echocardiographic data on MR evolution and excluded those with a concomitant tricuspid and mitral transcatheter valve intervention or with a history of mitral valve intervention. The co-primary outcomes were MR improvement and worsening at two timepoints: pre-discharge and 2-month follow-up. This analysis included 359 patients with severe TR, mostly(80%) treated with tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair(T-TEER). MR improvement was found in 106(29.5%) and 99(34%) patients, while MR worsening in 34(9.5%) and 33(11%) patients at pre-discharge and 2-month follow-up, respectively. Annuloplasty and heterotopic replacement were associated with MR worsening. Independent predictors of MR improvement were: atrial fibrillation, T-TEER, acute procedural success, TR reduction, LVEDD>60 mm and beta-blocker therapy. Patients with moderate-to-severe/severe MR following TTVI showed significantly higher death rates. CONCLUSION: MR degree variation is common after TTVI, with most cases showing improvement. Clinical and procedural characteristics may predict the MR evolution, in particular procedural success and T-TEER play key roles in MR outcomes. TTVI may be beneficial even in the presence of functional MR.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Current treatment recommendations for patients with heart failure and secondary mitral regurgitation include transcatheter edge-to-edge repair and mitral-valve surgery. Data from randomized trials comparing these therapies are lacking in this patient population. METHODS: In this noninferiority trial conducted in Germany, patients with heart failure and secondary mitral regurgitation who continued to have symptoms despite guideline-directed medical therapy were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to undergo either transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (intervention group) or surgical mitral-valve repair or replacement (surgery group). The primary efficacy end point was a composite of death, hospitalization for heart failure, mitral-valve reintervention, implantation of an assist device, or stroke within 1 year after the procedure. The primary safety end point was a composite of major adverse events within 30 days after the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 210 patients underwent randomization. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 70.5±7.9 years, 39.9% were women, and the mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 43.0±11.7%. Within 1 year, at least one of the components of the primary efficacy end point occurred in 16 of the 96 patients with available data (16.7%) in the intervention group and in 20 of the 89 with available data (22.5%) in the surgery group (estimated mean difference, -6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -17 to 6; P<0.001 for noninferiority). A primary safety end-point event occurred in 15 of the 101 patients with available data (14.9%) in the intervention group and in 51 of the 93 patients with available data (54.8%) in the surgery group (estimated mean difference, -40 percentage points; 95% CI, -51 to -27; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with heart failure and secondary mitral regurgitation, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair was noninferior to mitral-valve surgery with respect to a composite of death, rehospitalization for heart failure, stroke, reintervention, or implantation of an assist device in the left ventricle at 1 year. (Funded by Abbott Vascular; MATTERHORN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02371512.).

RESUMEN

The percutaneous treatment of structural, valvular, and non-valvular heart disease (SHD) is rapidly evolving. The Core Curriculum (CC) proposed by the EAPCI describes the knowledge, skills, and attitudes that define competency levels required by newly trained SHD interventional cardiologists (IC) and provides guidance for training centres. SHD ICs are cardiologists who have received complete interventional cardiology training. They are multidisciplinary team specialists who manage adult SHD patients from diagnosis to follow-up and perform percutaneous procedures in this area. They are competent in interpreting advanced imaging techniques and master planning software. The SHD ICs are expected to be proficient in the aortic, mitral, and tricuspid areas. They may have selective skills in either the aortic area or mitral/tricuspid areas. In this case, they must still have common transversal competencies in the aortic, mitral, and tricuspid areas. Additional SHD domain competencies are optional. Completing dedicated SHD training, aiming for full aortic, mitral, and tricuspid competencies, requires at least 18 months. For full training in the aortic area, with basic competencies in mitral/tricuspid areas, the training can be reduced to 1 year. The same is true for training in the mitral/tricuspid area, with competencies in the aortic area. The SHD IC CC promotes excellence and homogeneous training across Europe and is the cornerstone of future certifications and patient protection. It may be a reference for future CC for national associations and other SHD specialities, including imaging and cardiac surgery.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is characterized by impaired cardiac function, very high mortality, and limited treatment options. The pro-inflammatory signalling during different phases of CS is incompletely understood. METHODS: We collected serum and plasma (N=44) as well as freshly isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC, N=7) of patients with CS complicating acute myocardial infarction on admission and after revascularization (24h, 48h, 72h) and of healthy controls (serum and plasma N=75; PBMC N=12). RESULTS: PBMC of CS patients had increased gene expression of NLRP3, CASP1, PYCARD, IL1B, and IL18 and showed increased rates of pyroptosis (control: 4.7±0.3% vs. 9.9±1.7% in CS patients, p=0.02). Serum interleukin (IL)-1ß levels were increased after revascularization. IL-18 and IL-6 were higher in patients with CS than in healthy controls but comparable before and after revascularization. Pro-inflammatory apoptosis-associated speck-like proteins containing CARD (ASC) specks were elevated in the serum of CS patients on admission and increased after revascularization (admission: 11.1±4.4 specks/µl, after 24h: 19.0±3.9, p=0.02). ASC specks showed a significant association with 30-day mortality in patients with CS (p<0.05). The estimated regression coefficients and odds ratios indicated a positive relationship between ASC specks and mortality (Odds ratio 1.029, 95% CI, 1.000 to 1.072; p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Pyroptosis and circulating ASC specks are increased in patients with CS and are particularly induced after reperfusion This underscores their potential role as a biomarker for poor outcomes in CS patients. ASC specks represent promising new therapeutic targets for CS patients with high inflammatory burden.

RESUMEN

Introduction: The aim of this study was to analyze age-associated myocardial injury and clinical outcome after non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Methods: This prospective, multicenter study consists of 440 patients with NSTEMI enrolled at 7 centers. All patients were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention and underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging 1-10 days after study inclusion. CMR parameters of myocardial injury and clinical outcome were evaluated by creating 2 subgroups: <80 years vs. ≥80 years. The clinical endpoint was the 1-year incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) consisting of death, re-infarction and new congestive heart failure. Results: Elderly patients ≥80 years accounted for 13.9% of the study population and showed a divergent cardiovascular risk profile compared to the subgroup of patients <80 years. CMR imaging did not reveal significant differences regarding infarct size, microvascular obstruction, left ventricular ejection fraction or multidimensional strain analysis between the study groups. At 1-year follow-up, MACE rate was significantly increased in patients ≥80 years compared to patients aged <80 years (19.7% vs. 9.6%; p = 0.019). In a multiple stepwise logistic regression model, the number of diseased vessels, aldosterone antagonist use and left ventricular global longitudinal strain were identified as independent predictors for MACE in all patients, while there was no independent predictive value of age regarding 1-year clinical outcome. Conclusion: This prospective, multicenter analysis shows that structural and functional myocardial damage is similar in younger and older patients with NSTEMI. Furthermore, in this heterogeneous but also clinically representative cohort with reduced sample size, age was not independently associated with 1-year clinical outcome, despite an increased event rate in patients ≥80 years.