RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Adverse childhood events (ACEs) are prevalent and lead to well-established adverse health sequelae in adulthood. Recent literature has claimed that exposure to trauma in early life may worsen lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) because emotion can alter the perception of bodily distress in the brain. Specifically, depressive symptoms might influence the association between ACEs and LUTS. We aimed to describe the associations between ACEs and LUTS among males and females and to determine whether depressive symptoms mediated these associations. METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of the Coevorden observational cohort study (n = 1691, age ≥16 years). For this observational study participants filled in the male or female modules of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire for LUTS (ICIQ-MLUTS and ICIQ-FLUTS, respectively), the NEMESIS Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (emotional neglect, psychological abuse, physical abuse, and sexual abuse within the family), and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) for depression. RESULTS: Overall, 564 males and 811 females answered all required items related to LUTS and ACEs. A series of regression models were then estimated to test for mediation: LUTS on ACEs, depression on ACEs, and LUTS on both ACEs and depression. The models were also adjusted for the following covariates: age, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, current smokers, educational level, and vaginal delivery (if female). Depressive symptoms were shown to mediate the association between ACEs and LUTS in both males and females. CONCLUSION: Childhood adversity and depression are areas of interest during the clinical assessment of patients with LUTS. Early detection of these conditions might help to manage risk, aid in the prevention of LUTS, and facilitate trauma-informed care.
Asunto(s)
Depresión , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior , Pruebas Psicológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Depresión/psicología , Autoinforme , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/epidemiología , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/psicología , EmocionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common problem in primary care. BV symptoms often have a negative impact on patients' quality of life and may predispose to gynaecological problems. Some patients experience recurring episodes of BV. This study's objective is to identify possible factors that may be associated with BV recurrence and describe the characteristics of these patients and interventions performed by general practitioners. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we used data from a primary care registration network in the Netherlands in the period 2015-2020. We analysed differences between patients with recurrent BV and patients with a single episode of BV in terms of characteristics and interventions performed by general practitioners. RESULTS: We found that patients with recently prescribed antibiotics, and a medical history of sexually transmitted infections and/or Candidiasis significantly more often presented with recurrent BV. Patients with recurrent BV had more remote consultations and less in-person consultations than single-episode patients. The reason for encounter was more often a request for medication. Regarding GPs' diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, microbiological tests were more frequently performed in recurrent BV patients. Moreover, most patients in both groups were prescribed oral metronidazole most frequently. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings might help GPs to better recognise patients at risk of recurrence. GPs could re-evaluate their approach to the diagnosis and treatment of recurrent BV, opting for in-person consultation and using standardised diagnostic criteria and microbiological testing in patients with recurrent complaints. Antibiotic use for other conditions in these patients may lead to new BV episodes.
Asunto(s)
Vaginosis Bacteriana , Femenino , Humanos , Vaginosis Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Vaginosis Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Vaginosis Bacteriana/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Recurrencia , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Atención Primaria de SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Previous studies show an association between a history of abuse and higher care demand. However, studies in general practice regarding help-seeking behaviour by patients (mainly male patients) with a history of abuse are scarce. OBJECTIVES: To analyse help-seeking behaviour in general practice of men and women with a history of abuse. METHODS: A cohort study using data from a Dutch primary care registration network from 2015 to 2019. We included all patients aged ≥ 18 years who indicated on a questionnaire that they did or did not have a history of abuse. We analysed differences in contact frequency, types of contact, reason for encounter and diagnoses between men and women with or without a history of abuse. RESULTS: The questionnaire had a response rate of 59% and resulted in 11,140 patients, of which 1271 indicated a history of abuse. Men and women with a history of abuse contact the general practitioner (GP) 1.5 times (95% CI 1.42-1.60) more often than men and women without a history of abuse, especially for psychological (rate ratio 1.97, 95% CI 1.79-2.17) and social (rate ratio 1.93, 95% CI 1.68-2.22) problems. Moreover, when diagnosed with a psychological or social problem, patients with a history of abuse contact the GP twice more often for these problems. CONCLUSION: Compared to men and women without a history of abuse, men and women with a history of abuse visit their GP more often, particularly for psychological and social problems.
Asunto(s)
Conducta de Búsqueda de Ayuda , Adolescente , Estudios de Cohortes , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Atención Primaria de Salud , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) encounter women suffering from premenstrual symptoms. Often women with premenstrual problems experience little understanding from GPs. Views of GPs will influence their approach to these women and their care. Insight into these views is lacking but could help in designing educational programmes for GPs. OBJECTIVES: To explore the views of Dutch GPs towards aetiology, diagnostic process, and preferred treatment of premenstrual symptoms. METHODS: In 2017, we conducted a qualitative, semi-structured, interview survey among 27 GPs, varying in age, gender, and practice setting. RESULTS: Important themes emerged from the interviews: 'no need for a symptom diary,' 'PMS defined as illness' exclusively in case of disruption of normal functioning, and 'symptomatic treatment' as preferred approach. Most GPs considered PMS to be a physiological phenomenon, with taking history as an adequate diagnostic tool. Almost all GPs regarded a normal cyclical hormonal cycle as causal; many also mentioned the combination with personal sensitivity. Some pointed to a dividing line between physiological condition and illness if women could not function normally in daily life. Lastly, the approach GPs preferred was focussing on relieving symptoms of individual patients. In addition to explaining the hormonal cycle and lifestyle advice, all GPs advocated oral contraceptives, and if necessary psychological support. GPs expressed negative feelings about prescribing antidepressants. CONCLUSION: GPs considered physiological changes and personal sensitivity as aetiological factors. We recommend more training to improve GPs knowledge and more insight into the burden of women with PMS. A symptom diary is an essential diagnostic tool for GPs.
Asunto(s)
Médicos Generales , Síndrome Premenstrual , Femenino , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Investigación Cualitativa , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Endometriosis is an invalidating gynaecological condition in women of reproductive age, and a frequent cause of infertility. Unfortunately, the condition is characterized by a long interval between onset of symptoms and diagnosis. GPs in the Netherlands are educated to provide basic gynaecological care and serve as gatekeepers for specialist medical care. Therefore, it is of great importance that they recognize signs and symptoms possibly caused by endometriosis to initiate adequate actions. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators to the timely diagnosis of endometriosis from the GPs' perspective. METHODS: Semi-structured focus group discussions with GPs were organized throughout the Netherlands. The participants were encouraged to brainstorm about their perspective on daily practice regarding endometriosis and suggestions for interventions to enable early diagnosis and treatment. Analysis was based on grounded theory methodology. RESULTS: Forty-three GPs participated in six focus groups. Analysis of the transcripts revealed relevant determinants of practice in four main themes: professionals' experience and competence, patient characteristics, guideline factors and professional collaboration. A lack of knowledge and awareness appeared to result in a low priority for establishing the diagnosis of endometriosis, especially in young women. Infertility, patient engagement and a recent serious case or training facilitated referral. CONCLUSION: Several factors in daily primary health care contribute to the diagnostic delay in endometriosis. Future interventions to reduce this delay may be aimed at increasing awareness by means of education, incorporating the subject into national clinical guidelines and improvements in interdisciplinary collaboration.
Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico Tardío , Endometriosis/diagnóstico , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Atención Primaria de Salud , Competencia Profesional , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Masculino , Países BajosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is the most prevalent subtype of urinary incontinence and is a bothering condition in women. Only a minority of those with SUI consult a general practitioner (GP). EHealth with pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is effective in reducing incontinence symptoms and might increase access to care. The role of the GP regarding such an eHealth intervention is unknown. The aim of the study is to gain insight into the attitudes towards a PFMT internet-based, eHealth, intervention for SUI. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews among purposively sampled GPs. Audio records were fully transcribed, and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Thirteen GPs were interviewed, nine females and four males. Three themes emerged: appraisal of eHealth as a welcome new tool, mixed feelings about a supportive role, and eHealth is no cure-all. GPs welcomed eHealth for SUI as matching their preferences for PFMT and having advantages for patients. With eHealth as stand-alone therapy GPs were concerned about the lack of feedback, and the loss of motivation to adhere to the intervention. Therefore, GPs considered personal support important. The GP's decision to recommend eHealth was strongly influenced by a woman's motivation and her age. GPs' treatment preferences for elderly are different from those for young women with SUI; both PFMT and eHealth are perceived less suitable for older women. CONCLUSION: EHealth with PFMT fits into the GPs' routine practice of SUI and adds value to it. Although there is evidence that eHealth as a stand-alone intervention is effective, GPs consider personal support important to supplement the perceived shortcomings. Probably GPs are not aware of, or convinced of the existing evidence. Training should address this issue and should also focus on common misunderstandings about regular care for women with SUI, such as the idea that PFMT is not suitable for the elderly. Improving GPs' knowledge that eHealth can be a stand-alone therapy for SUI facilitates the implementation in daily care.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Médicos Generales , Intervención basada en la Internet , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Incontinencia Urinaria de Esfuerzo/rehabilitación , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diafragma Pélvico , Investigación Cualitativa , Autocuidado , TelemedicinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The focus of Chlamydia trachomatis screening and testing lies more on women than on men. The study aim was to establish by systematic review the prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in men and women in the general population. METHODS: Electronic databases and reference lists were searched from 2000 to 2013 using the key words "Chlamydia trachomatis", "population-based study" and "disease prevalence". Reference lists were checked. Studies were included in the analysis if Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence was reported for both men and women in a population-based study. Prevalence rates for men and women were described as well as highest prevalence rate by age and sex. The difference in prevalence between the sexes in each study was calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria and quality assessment for the review. In nine of the twenty-five studies there was a statistically significant sex difference in the chlamydia prevalence. In all nine studies the prevalence of chlamydia was higher in women than in men. The prevalence for women varied from 1.1% to 10.6% and for men from 0.1% to 12.1%. The average chlamydia prevalence is highly variable between countries. The highest prevalence of chlamydia occurred predominantly in younger age groups (< 25 years). The absence of symptoms in population-based urogenital chlamydia infection is common in men and women (mean 88.5% versus 68.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The urogenital chlamydia trachomatis prevalence in the general population is more similar than dissimilar for men and women. A modest sex difference is apparent. The prevalence rates can be used to inform chlamydia screening strategies in general practice.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Chlamydia/epidemiología , Chlamydia trachomatis/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores SexualesRESUMEN
AIM: This paper is a report of a study to explore the views of midwives on women's positions during the second stage of labour. BACKGROUND: Many authors recommend encouraging women to use positions that are most comfortable to them. Others advocate encouragement of non-supine positions, because offering 'choice' is not enough to reverse the strong cultural norm of giving birth in the supine position. Midwives' views on women's positions have rarely been explored. METHOD: Six focus groups were conducted in 2006-2007 with a purposive sample of 31 midwives. The data were interpreted using Thachuk's models of informed consent and informed choice. FINDINGS: The models were useful in distinguishing between two different approaches of midwives to women's positions during labour. When giving informed consent, midwives implicitly or explicitly ask a woman's consent for what they themselves prefer. When offering informed choice, a woman's preference is the starting point, but midwives will suggest other options if this is in the woman's interest. Obstetric factors and working conditions are reasons to deviate from women's preferences. CONCLUSIONS: To give women an informed choice about birthing positions, midwives need to give them information during pregnancy and discuss their position preferences. Women should be prepared for the unpredictability of their feelings in labour and for obstetric factors that may interfere with their choice of position. Equipment for non-supine births should be more midwife-friendly. In addition, midwives and students need to be able to gain experience in assisting births in non-supine positions.