RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Radiation exposure during urological procedures is still of concern in the urology community. It has been reported that percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in supine position has less irradiation, as the puncture is mostly done under ultrasound guidance. However, it can also be done under fluoroscopy guidance. Unfortunately, data on radiation exposure during PCNL is lacking since they are often drawn from generalization and extrapolation, or they do not evaluate new procedures or different positions. The aim of our study was to compare the radiation dose depending on the position of the surgeon during PCNL. METHODS: A portable C-arm was used in standard mode (32 impulsions/second; 98 kV, 3.8 mA). Specific dosimeters were placed for lens, extremity, and torso. Anthropomorphic models and hand phantom models were used to reproduce the position of surgeon and patient (with same bone density as human) during PCNL in prone and modified supine position. Fluoroscopy time (FT) was six minutes to obtain higher exploitable signal, and the results are given for a FT of three minutes (more realistic). Ten percent of the FT is done with an angulation of 15 degrees and the rest in anteroposterior position. RESULTS: The equivalent doses (ED) are given in uSV (uncertainty k=2). During the modified supine position: neck, lens, right index finger, left thumb, and index finger received EDs of 99 (20%), 62 (18%), 437 (10%), 112 (12%), and 204 (10%), respectively. In a prone position, the phantom received ED on the neck, lens, right thumb and index finger, left thumb and index finger of 85 (20%), 92 (12%), 401 (10%), 585 (10%), 295 (10%), and 567 (10%), respectively. In both positions, the right hand seems more exposed than the left hand. CONCLUSIONS: The effective dose is 1.5- and 1.3-fold higher for lens and extremities, respectively, in prone position PCNL compared to modified supine position. Both positions are still well below the recommended limit for professional exposure.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Over the past 20 years, the use of fluoroscopy to guide urologic surgical interventions has been constantly growing. Thus, in their daily practice, urologists and other operating room (OR) staff are exposed to X-radiation increasingly frequently. This raises questions as to the risks they encounter and the actions needed to reduce them. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate X-ray dose exposure in the members of the surgical team and determine urologist radioprotection knowledge and practices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective bicenter study was conducted within AFUF (French urology resident association) and in association with The French Nuclear Safety Authority/The Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (ASN/IRSN). Radiation exposure was measured on 12 operators using dosimeters (seven per operator), in staff-occupied locations in the OR using ionization chambers, and on anthropomorphic phantoms. A survey was used to gather information on radiation knowledge and safety practices of the AFUF members. RESULTS: Annual whole-body radiation doses were low (0.1-0.8 millisieverts [mSv], mostly at around 0.3 mSv), and equivalent doses were low for the fingers (0.7-15 mSv, mostly at around 2.5 mSv), and low for the lens of the eye (0.3-2.3 mSv, mostly at around 0.7 mSv). In percutaneous nephrolithotomy, extremity doses were lower when the patient was placed in dorsal decubitus compared with ventral decubitus. Pulsed fluoroscopy reduced radiation dose exposure by a factor of 3 compared with continuous fluoroscopy with no image quality loss. Radiation safety practices were poor: only 15% of urologists wore dosimeters and only 5% had been trained in the handling of X-ray generators. CONCLUSION: In the present study, radiation exposure for urologists was low, but so was knowledge of radiation safety and optimization practices. This absence of training for radiation safety and reduction, teamed with novel techniques involving long fluoroscopy-guided interventions, could result in unnecessarily high exposure for patients and OR personnel.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Conservative treatment (CT) with flexible ureteroscopy and laser ablation is an alternative to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for the treatment of the upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The purpose of this study was to compare the pathology results obtained after immediate RNU or after attempt of CT for elective indication. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in a single tertiary center. All patients who had an RNU for urothelial carcinoma between 2007 and 2012 have been included. The patients were classified into two groups: group 1 is immediate RNU, and group 2 is RNU after CT (only elective indications). Preoperative data collected were as follows: age, sex, chronic kidney failure, radiological classification for cancer staging (TNM), tumor size, localization, and multifocal indication of CT. The pathological RNU data collected were tumor stage and grade. The T stage was divided into two groups (primary endpoint): pTa-T1-T2 and pT3-T4. The χ(2) test and Mann-Whitney was performed to compare the independent qualitative and quantitative variables, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients were included (40 patients in the immediate RNU group and 11 patients in the delayed RNU group after CT). Patients in both groups had comparable characteristics regarding age, sex, location, T stage, and preoperative tumor grade. On final pathology, 23 tumors were classified as pTa-T1-T2 in the immediate RNU group compared with 6 in the delayed RNU group. Seventeen and five tumors were classified as T3 in group 1 and group 2, respectively. These results were not significantly different between both groups (p=0.866). The pathological RNU grade was not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSION: Within the limits of this retrospective study, the pathological RNU data showed no significant difference when RNU was done immediately or after CT for UTUC.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND and Purpose: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a recognized option for surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). While laser parameters and enucleation techniques have been widely investigated, morcellation techniques remain poorly evaluated in the literature. Our goal was to objectively evaluate the available devices used for morcellation during HoLEP. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An in vitro evaluation of two morcellators (Lumenis and Wolf) and two nephroscopes (Wolf and Storz) was conducted. For morcellators, the following parameters were assessed: Aspiration power (time to aspirate 1 L of water), morcellation power (g of baked chicken meat morcellated in 2 minutes), and visual control of the cutting part of the device (visible or not visible). For nephroscopes, data collected were: Field of vision (measured on a 4 cm distant sight) and irrigation flow (time needed to drain a 3-liter bag of water suspended at 1 m of height). RESULTS: For the Wolf and Lumenis morcellators, aspiration power parameters were 20.4 mL/s and 22.2 mL/s, and morcellating power parameters were 2.5 g and 6 g of tissue per minute, respectively. The cutting part of the Wolf morcellator was permanently under control during the procedure, whereas the distal part of the cutting device was out of vision control with the Lumenis. Evaluation of Storz and Wolf nephroscopes showed that field of vision was larger with the Storz, and irrigation flow was 0.35 and 0.52 L/min, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Storz nephroscope has a greater field of vision but less important blood flows. The Lumenis morcellator is faster than the Wolf morcellator. These objective data could set up the basis for a prospective trial comparing the two devices.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Advantages of laparoscopic approach in Hirschsprung disease have been already published decreasing the hospital stay and postoperative adhesions. To our knowledge, we report the first case of postoperative abdominal cellulitis after laparoscopic procedure. A laparoscopic Duhamel pull through was done on a 3-month-old child. Full-thickness biopsy under laparoscopy was performed with intraperitoneal inoculation. Large peritoneal irrigation was used. Abdominal necrotizing cellulitis starting from a port site occurred few days after the procedure requiring repeat surgical excision, broad spectrum antibiotics, and hyperbaric oxygen.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: A few studies have investigated the impact of photovaporization of the prostate (PVP) on sexual function and were mainly focused on erectile function. AIMS: To comprehensively evaluate the impact of PVP on sexual function. METHODS: A prospective evaluation involved sexually active patients needing surgical relief of bladder outlet obstruction due to benign prostatic enlargement in a single center between August 2007 and November 2011. All patients underwent PVP using the GreenLight HPS™ 120W system (AmericanMedicalSystems, Minnetonka, MN, USA). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively by International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS), I-PSS question 8, uroflowmetry parameters (maximum urinary flow rate [Qmax ] and postvoid residual [PVR] volume), Danish Prostate Symptom Score Sexual items (DAN-PSSsex), and overall sexual satisfaction using a seven-grade Likert scale. Operative parameters and postoperative complications were also assessed. Preoperative and postoperative values were compared using the Pearson chi-square test and the Wilcoxon paired test. A multivariable model was used to investigate the determinants of variation of global sexual satisfaction. RESULTS: One hundred and two consecutive patients with 12-month follow-up data were included in the analysis. Urinary parameters (I-PSS, Qmax , and PVR) were significantly improved compared with preoperative values. Compared with baseline, postoperative erection symptom score was not significantly different, whereas ejaculation symptom score was significantly worse. Global DAN-PSSsex score was unchanged, but DAN-PSSsex symptom score was worse (P = 0.04) and DAN-PSSsex bother score was significantly improved (P < 0.0001). Global sexual satisfaction was significantly improved compared with baseline (P = 0.02) and was significantly associated with I-PSS but not with erection and ejaculation score in a multivariable model. CONCLUSION: Ejaculation is the main sexual function impacted by PVP. Despite this, sexual satisfaction and bother due to sexual symptoms were significantly improved, probably due to the positive impact of urinary symptom relief.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)