RESUMEN
Introduction: Craniofacial penetrating injuries are not a rare sight in the career of oral and maxillofacial surgeons and trainees, but bizarre craniomaxillofacial sharp injuries caused by peculiar foreign bodies to the head and neck region, complicating and obscuring the vital structures, are seldom found. Foreign bodies such as lunch boxes, wooden branches or twigs are peculiarly associated with penetrating/perforating craniofacial severe impaled injuries with dramatic consequences. Case Report: Three cases are reported, with elaborate descriptions of the site, kind, and severity of the injuries. Cases 1 and 3, wooden impalement injuries into the neck region and sensitive orbital region, respectively, necessitating immediate surgical retrieval as in both cases. In case 2, 4-year old sustained an injury with a sharp rim of the lunch box, obscuring the entire craniofacial region and impeding the primary care and assessment.Cases represent the peculiarity of the injuries caused by unusual foreign bodies and how their uniqueness demanded a different surgical intervention.The need for a multidisciplinary approach is crucial to managing these injuries in areas with a high degree of specialization overlap, such as the craniofacial region. Conclusion: We give an overview of the diagnosis and treatment of penetrating foreign body trauma encountered in our department. Every foreign body penetrating trauma demands a formulation of a different surgical plan and stands as a challenge for the treating surgeons. Adequate radiology knowledge, detection, vigilant clinical assessment, and tension-free closure are a few of the important aspects for the ideal management of penetrating foreign body trauma.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Mandibular fractures vary significantly with respect to epidemiological and demographic parameters among populations. To date, no study has evaluated these aspects of mandibular fractures in Nuh, Mewat, Haryana, India. To retrospectively analyze the incidence, age and sex distributions, etiology, anatomic distribution, occlusal status, treatment modality provided, and their correlation in patients who suffered isolated mandibular fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of maxillofacial injury patients who reported to the Department of Dentistry, SHKM Government Medical College from January 2013 to December 2019, were retrieved from our database, and necessary information was collected. The data collected were analyzed statistically using IBM SPSS ver. 21. RESULTS: Totals of 146 patients and 211 fractures were analyzed. There were 127 males and 19 females with an age range of 3-70 years (mean age, 26 years). Road traffic accident (RTA) was the most common cause of fracture (64.4%), followed by fall (19.9%), assault (15.1%), and sports injury (0.7%). Of all patients, 42.5% had bilateral fractures, 31.5% had left side fracture, 21.2% had right side fracture, 3.4% sustained midline symphyseal fracture, and 1.4% had symphyseal fracture along one side of the mandible. Site distribution was as follows: parasymphysis (34.6%), angle (23.7%), condyle (20.4%), body (12.8%), symphysis (4.3%), ramus 2.4%, and dentoalveolar 1.9%. The most common facture combination was angle with parasymphysis (17.8%). Occlusion was disrupted in 69.2% patients. Closed reduction was the predominant treatment modality. CONCLUSION: The data obtained from retrospective analyses of maxillofacial trauma increase the understanding of variables and their outcomes among populations. The results of the present study are comparable to those of the literature in some aspects and different in others.