RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The plate fixation for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has become increasingly widespread for facilitating early mobilization and improving fusion rate. However, apart from multilevel operations, there is still some controversy over its use for single-level ACDF. This retrospective study has compared the reoperation rates after single-level ACDFs performed at our institution between the procedures with and without plate fixation. METHODS: This retrospective study included a total of 131 patients with???1-year of follow-up after a single-level ACDF, consisting of 100 patients without plating (conventional ACDF) and 31 patients with plate fixation (plated ACDF). RESULTS: Eleven patients (8.4% of all patients):four conventional ACDFs (4% of the conventional ACDFs) and seven plated ACDFs (22.6% of the plated ACDFs), had reoperation surgeries. The incidence of reoperation was significantly higher in the plated ACDFs than in the conventional ACDFs (P=0.0037). The log-rank test revealed a significant difference (P=0.00003) in 5-year reoperation-free survival rates between the conventional (96.9%) and the plated groups (68.3%). CONCLUSION: Anterior cervical plating may have a negative impact on the adjacent segment integrity, resulting in an increased reoperation rate after a single-level ACDF at relatively shorter postoperative time points. J. Med. Invest. 70 : 334-342, August, 2023.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter prospective study. OBJECTIVES: Although intramedullary spinal cord tumor (IMSCT) and extramedullary SCT (EMSCT) surgeries carry high risk of intraoperative motor deficits (MDs), the benefits of transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring are well-accepted; however, comparisons have not yet been conducted. This study aimed to clarify the efficacy of TcMEP monitoring during IMSCT and EMSCT resection surgeries. METHODS: We prospectively reviewed TcMEP monitoring data of 81 consecutive IMSCT and 347 EMSCT patients. We compared the efficacy of interventions based on TcMEP alerts in the IMSCT and EMSCT groups. We defined our alert point as a TcMEP amplitude reduction of ≥70% from baseline. RESULTS: In the IMSCT group, TcMEP monitoring revealed 20 true-positive (25%), 8 rescue (10%; rescue rate 29%), 10 false-positive, a false-negative, and 41 true-negative patients, resulting in a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 80%. In the EMSCT group, TcMEP monitoring revealed 20 true-positive (6%), 24 rescue (7%; rescue rate 55%), 29 false-positive, 2 false-negative, and 263 true-negative patients, resulting in a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 90%. The most common TcMEP alert timing was during tumor resection (96% vs. 91%), and suspension surgeries with or without intravenous steroid administration were performed as intervention techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative MD rates in IMSCT and EMSCT surgeries using TcMEP monitoring were 25% and 6%, and rescue rates were 29% and 55%. We believe that the usage of TcMEP monitoring and appropriate intervention techniques during SCT surgeries might have predicted and prevented the occurrence of intraoperative MDs.

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter cohort study. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to clarify the efficacy of multimodal intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), especially in transcranial electrical stimulation of motor-evoked potentials (TES-MEPs) with spinal cord-evoked potentials after transcranial stimulation of the brain (D-wave) in the detection of reversible spinal cord injury in high-risk spinal surgery. METHODS: We reviewed 1310 patients who underwent TES-MEPs during spinal surgery at 14 spine centers. We compared the monitoring results of TES-MEPs with D-wave vs TES-MEPs without D-wave in high-risk spinal surgery. RESULTS: There were 40 cases that used TES-MEPs with D-wave and 1270 cases that used TES-MEPs without D-wave. Before patients were matched, there were significant differences between groups in terms of sex and spinal disease category. Although there was no significant difference in the rescue rate between TES-MEPs with D-wave (2.0%) and TES-MEPs (2.5%), the false-positivity rate was significantly lower (0%) in the TES-MEPs-with-D-wave group. Using a one-to-one propensity score-matched analysis, 40 pairs of patients from the two groups were selected. Baseline characteristics did not significantly differ between the matched groups. In the score-matched analysis, one case (2.5%) in both groups was a case of rescue (P = 1), five (12.5%) cases in the TES-MEPs group were false positives, and there were no false positives in the TES-MEPs-with-D-wave group (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: TES-MEPs with D-wave in high-risk spine surgeries did not affect rescue case rates. However, it helped reduce the false-positivity rate.

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, multicenter study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEPs) during supine-to-prone position change for thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (T-OPLL). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Supine-to-prone position change might be a risk of spinal cord injury in posterior decompression and fusion surgeries for T-OPLL. METHODS: The subjects were 145 patients with T-OPLL surgically treated with posterior decompression and fusion using Tc-MEPs in 14 institutes. Tc-MEPs were monitored before surgery from supine-to-prone position and intraoperatively in seven institutes and only intraoperatively in the other seven institutes because of disapproval of the anesthesia department. In cases of Tc-MEP alert after position change, we adjusted the cervicothoracic posture. When the MEP did not recover, we reverted the position to supine and monitored the Tc-MEPs in supine position. RESULTS: There were 83 and 62 patients with/without Tc-MEP before position change to prone (group A and B). The true-positive rate was lower in group A than group B, but without statistical significance (8.4% vs. 16.1%, P = 0.12). In group A, five patients who had Tc-MEP alert during supine-to-prone position change were all female and had larger body mass index values and upper thoracic lesions. Among the patients, three underwent surgeries after cervicothoracic alignment adjustment, and two had postponed operations to 1 week later with halo-vest fixation because of repeated Tc-MEP alerts during position change to prone. The Tc-MEP alert at exposure was statistically more frequent in group B than in group A ( P = 0.033). CONCLUSION: Tc-MEP alert during position change is an important sign of spinal cord injury due to alignment change at the upper thoracic spine. Tc-MEP monitoring before supine-to-prone position change was necessary to prevent spinal cord injury in surgeries for T-OPLL.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter study. OBJECTIVE: To examine transcranial motor-evoked potential (Tc-MEP) waveforms in intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in surgery for intradural extramedullary (IDEM) tumors, focused on the characteristics for cervical, thoracic, and conus lesions. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: IDEM tumors are normally curable after resection, but neurological deterioration may occur after surgery. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring using Tc-MEPs during surgery is important for timely detection of possible neurological injury. METHODS: The subjects were 233 patients with IDEM tumors treated surgically with Tc-MEP monitoring at 9 centers. The alarm threshold was ≥70% waveform deterioration from baseline. A case with a Tc-MEP alert that normalized and had no new motor deficits postoperatively was defined as a rescue case. A deterioration of manual muscle test score ≥1 compared to the preoperative value was defined as postoperative worsening of motor status. RESULTS: The 233 patients (92 males, 39%) had a mean age of 58.1 ±â€Š18.1 years, and 185 (79%), 46 (20%), and 2 (1%) had schwannoma, meningioma, and neurofibroma. These lesions had cervical (C1-7), thoracic (Th1-10), and conus (Th11-L2) locations in 82 (35%), 96 (41%), and 55 (24%) cases. There were no significant differences in preoperative motor deficit among the lesion levels. Thoracic lesions had a significantly higher rate of poor baseline waveform derivation (0% cervical, 6% thoracic, 0% conus, P < 0.05) and significantly more frequent intraoperative alarms (20%, 31%, 15%, P < 0.05). Use of Tc-MEPs for predicting neurological deficits after IDEM surgery had sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 89%; however, the positive predictive value was low. CONCLUSION: Poor derivation of waveforms, appearance of alarms, and worse final waveforms were all significantly more frequent for thoracic lesions. Thus, amplification of the waveform amplitude, using multimodal monitoring, and more appropriate interventions after an alarm may be particularly important in surgery for thoracic IDEM tumors.Level of Evidence: 3.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

A prospective multicenter cohort study. To clarify the differences in the accuracy of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcE-MEPs) and procedures associated with the alarms between cervical anterior spinal fusion (ASF) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF). Neurological complications after TcE-MEP alarms have been prevented by appropriate interventions for cervical degenerative disorders. The differences in the accuracy of TcE-MEPs and the timing of alarms between cervical ASF and PSF noted in the existing literature remain unclear. Patients (n = 415) who underwent cervical ASF (n = 171) or PSF (n = 244) at multiple institutions for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, spinal injury, and others were analyzed. Neurological complications, TcE-MEP alarms defined as a decreased amplitude of ≤70% compared to the control waveform, interventions after alarms, and TcE-MEP results were compared between the 2 surgeries. The incidence of neurological complications was 1.2% in the ASF group and 2.0% in the PSF group, with no significant intergroup differences (P-value was .493). Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and rate of rescue were 50.0%, 95.2%, 99.4%, and 1.8%, respectively, in the ASF group, and 80.0%, 90.9%, 99.5%, and 2.9%, respectively, in the PSF group. The accuracy of TcE-MEPs was not significantly different between the 2 groups (P-value was .427 in sensitivity, .109 in specificity, and .674 in negative predictive value). The procedures associated with the alarms were decompression in 3 cases and distraction in 1 patient in the ASF group. The PSF group showed Tc-MEPs decreased during decompression, mounting rods, turning positions, and others. Most alarms went off during decompression in ASF, whereas various stages of the surgical procedures were associated with the alarms in PSF. There were no significant differences in the accuracy of TcE-MEPs between the 2 surgeries.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

To study if spinal motor evoked potentials (SpMEPs), muscle responses after electrical stimulation of the spinal cord, can monitor the corticospinal tract. Study 1 comprised 10 consecutive cervical or thoracic myelopathic patients. We recorded three types of muscle responses intraoperatively: (1) transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs), (2) SpMEPs and (3) SpMEPs + TcMEPs from the abductor hallucis (AH) using train stimulation. Study 2 dealt with 5 patients, who underwent paired train stimulation to the spinal cord with intertrain interval of 50-60 ms for recording AH SpMEPs. We will also describe two illustrative cases to demonstrate the clinical value of AH SpMEPs for monitoring the motor pathway. In Study 1, SpMEPs and SpMEPs + TcMEPs recorded from AH measured nearly the same, suggesting the collision of the cranially evoked volleys with the antidromic signals induced by spinal cord stimulation via the corticospinal tracts. In Study 2, the first and second train stimuli elicited almost identical SpMEPs, indicating a quick return of transmission after 50-60 ms considered characteristic of the corticospinal tract rather than the dorsal column, which would have recovered much more slowly. Of the two patients presented, one had no post-operative neurological deteriorations as anticipated by stable SpMEPs, despite otherwise insufficient IONM, and the other developed post-operative motor deficits as predicted by simultaneous reduction of TcMEPs and SpMEPs in the face of normal SEPs. Electrical stimulation of the spinal cord primarily activates the corticospinal tract to mediate SpMEPs.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective multicenter observational study. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the efficacy of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc(E)-MEPs) in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) surgery by comparing cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) to cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and investigate the timing of Tc(E)-MEPs alerts and types of interventions affecting surgical outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although CSM and OPLL are the most commonly encountered diseases of DCM, the benefits of Tc(E)-MEPs for DCM remain unclear and comparisons of these two diseases have not yet been conducted. METHODS: We examined the results of Tc(E)-MEPs from 1176 DCM cases (840 CSM /336 OPLL) and compared patients background by disease, preoperative motor deficits, and the type of surgical procedure. We also assessed the efficacy of interventions based on Tc(E)-MEPs alerts. Tc(E)-MEPs alerts were defined as an amplitude reduction of more than 70% below the control waveform. Rescue cases were defined as those in which waveform recovery was achieved after interventions in response to alerts and no postoperative paralysis. RESULTS: Overall sensitivity was 57.1%, and sensitivity was higher with OPLL (71.4%) than with CSM (42.9%). The sensitivity of acute onset segmental palsy including C5 palsy was 40% (OPLL/CSM: 66.7%/0%) whereas that of lower limb palsy was 100%. The most common timing of Tc(E)-MEPs alerts was during decompression (63.16%), followed by screw insertion (15.79%). The overall rescue rate was 57.9% (OPLL/CSM: 58.3%/57.1%). CONCLUSION: Since Tc(E)-MEPs are excellent for detecting long tract injuries, surgeons need to consider appropriate interventions in response to alerts. The detection of acute onset segmental palsy by Tc(E)-MEPs was partially possible with OPLL, but may still be difficult with CSM. The rescue rate was higher than 50% and appropriate interventions may have prevented postoperative neurological complications.Level of Evidence: 3.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter study. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study is to examine cases with poor baseline waveform derivation for all muscles in multichannel monitoring of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEPs) in spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) is useful for identifying neurologic deterioration during spinal surgery. Tc-MEPs are widely used for IONM, but some cases have poor waveform derivation, even in multichannel Tc-MEP monitoring. METHODS: The subjects were 3625 patients (mean age 60.1 years, range 4-95; 1886 females, 1739 males) who underwent Tc-MEP monitoring during spinal surgery at 16 spine centers between April 2017 and March 2020. Baseline Tc-MEPs were recorded from the deltoid, abductor pollicis brevis, adductor longus, quadriceps femoris, hamstrings, tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius, and abductor hallucis (AH) muscles after surgical exposure of the spine. RESULTS: The 3625 cases included cervical, thoracic, and lumbar lesions (50%, 33% and 17%, respectively) and had preoperative motor status of no motor deficit, and motor deficit with manual muscle testing (MMT) ≥3 and MMT <3 (70%, 24% and 6%, respectively). High-risk surgery was performed in 1540 cases (43%). There were 73 cases with poor baseline waveform derivation (2%), and this was significantly associated with higher body weight, body mass index, thoracic lesions, motor deficit of MMT <3, high-risk surgery (42/1540 [2.7%] vs. 31/2085 [1.5%], P < 0.05), and surgery for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Intraoperative waveform derivation occurred in 25 poor derivation cases (34%) and the AH had the highest rate. CONCLUSION: The rate of poor baseline waveform derivation in spine surgery was 2% in our series. This was significantly more likely in high-risk surgery for thoracic lesions and OPLL, and in cases with preoperative severe motor deficit. In such cases, it may be preferable to use multiple modalities for IONM to derive multichannel waveforms from distal limb muscles, including the AH.Level of Evidence: 3.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to validate an alarm point of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring () formulated by the Monitoring Working Group (WG) of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The Monitoring WG of the JSSR formulated an alarm point of IONM using transcranial electrical stimulation-muscle motor evoked potentials (Tc(E)-MEPs) and has conducted a prospective multicenter study. The validity of the JSSR alarm point of ≥ 70% decreased in Tc(E)-MEPs for each high-risk surgery and any other spine surgeries has not been verified. METHODS: Patients who underwent spine and spinal cord surgery with IONM in 16 Japanese spine centers in the Monitoring WG of the JSSR from 2017 to 2018 were enrolled. The patients were divided into the high-risk surgery group (Group HR) and the common surgery group (Group C). Group HR was defined by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), spinal deformity, and spinal cord tumor. Group C was classified as other spine surgeries. The alarm point was defined as a ≥70% decrease in the Tc(E)-MEPs. RESULTS: In Group HR, the sensitivity and specificity were 94.4% and 87.0%, respectively. In Group C, the sensitivity and specificity were 63.6% and 91.9%. The sensitivity in Group C was statistically lower than that in Group HR (P < 0.05). In Group HR, the sensitivity and specificity in OPLL were 100% and 86.9%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity in spinal deformity were 87.5% and 84.8%, respectively, and the sensitivity and specificity in spinal cord tumors were 92.9% and 89.9%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity in each high-risk surgery showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: The alarm point of IONM by the Monitoring WG of the JSSR appeared to be valid for each disease in Group HR. Meanwhile, applying the JSSR alarm point for Group C potentially needed attention.Level of Evidence: 3.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter observational study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEPs) baseline characteristics of lower limb muscles and to determine the accuracy of Tc-MEPs monitoring based on preoperative motor status in surgery for high-risk spinal disease. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Neurological complications are potentially serious side effects in surgery for high-risk spine disease. Intraoperative spinal neuromonitoring (IONM) using Tc-MEPs waveforms can be used to identify neurologic deterioration, but cases with preoperative motor deficit tend to have poor waveform derivation. METHODS: IONM was performed using Tc-MEPs for 949 patients in high-risk spinal surgery. A total of 4454 muscles in the lower extremities were chosen for monitoring. The baseline Tc-MEPs was recorded immediately after exposure of the spine. The derivation rate was defined as muscles detected/muscles prepared for monitoring. A preoperative neurological grade was assigned using the manual muscle test (MMT) score. RESULTS: The 949 patients (mean age 52.5 ±â€Š23.3 yrs, 409 males [43%]) had cervical, thoracic, thoracolumbar, and lumbar lesions at rates of 32%, 40%, 26%, and 13%, respectively. Preoperative severe motor deficit (MMT ≤3) was present in 105 patients (11%), and thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) was the most common disease in these patients. There were 32 patients (3%) with no detectable waveform in any muscles, and these cases had mostly thoracic lesions. Baseline Tc-MEPs responses were obtained from 3653/4454 muscles (82%). Specificity was significantly lower in the severe motor deficit group. Distal muscles had a higher waveform derivation rate, and the abductor hallucis (AH) muscle had the highest derivation rate, including in cases with preoperative severe motor deficit. CONCLUSION: In high-risk spinal surgery, Tc-MEPs collected with multi-channel monitoring had significantly lower specificity in cases with preoperative severe motor deficit. Distal muscles had a higher waveform derivation rate and the AH muscle had the highest rate, regardless of the severity of motor deficit preoperatively.Level of Evidence: 3.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate transcranial motor evoked potential (Tc-MEP) waveform monitoring in spinal surgery for patients with severe obesity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spine surgeries in obese patients are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Intraoperative Tc-MEP monitoring can identify neurologic deterioration during surgery, but has not been examined for obese patients. METHODS: The subjects were 3560 patients who underwent Tc-MEP monitoring during spine surgery at 16 centers. Tc-MEPs were recorded from multiple muscles via needle or disc electrodes. A decrease in Tc-MEP amplitude of ≥70% from baseline was used as an alarm during surgery. Preoperative muscle weakness with manual muscle test (MMT) grade ≤4 was defined as a motor deficit, and a reduction of one or more MMT grade postoperatively was defined as deterioration. RESULTS: The 3560 patients (1698 males, 47.7%) had a mean age of 60.0 ±â€Š20.3 years. Patients with body mass index >35 kg/m2 (n = 60, 1.7%) were defined as severely obese. Compared with all other patients (controls), the rates of preoperative motor deficit (41.0% vs. 29.6%, P < 0.05) and undetectable baseline waveforms in all muscles were significantly higher in the severely obese group (20.0% vs. 1.7%, P < 0.01). Postoperative motor deterioration did not differ significantly between the groups. The sensitivity and specificity of the alarm criterion for prediction of postoperative neurologic complications were 75.0% and 83.9% in severely obese patients and 76.4% and 89.6% in controls, with no significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSION: Tc-MEPs can be used in spine surgery for severely obese cases to predict postoperative motor deficits, but the rate of undetectable waveforms is significantly higher in such cases. Use of a multichannel waveform approach or multiple modalities may facilitate safe completion of surgery. Waveforms should be carefully evaluated and an appropriate rescue procedure is required if the alarm criterion occurs.Level of Evidence: 3.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) is important for detecting neurological dysfunction, allowing for intervention and reversal of neurological deficits before they become permanent. Of the several IONM modalities, transcranial electrical stimulation of motor-evoked potential (TES-MEP) can help monitor the activity in the pyramidal tract. Surgery- and non-surgery-related factors could result in a TES-MEP alert during surgery. Once the alert occurs, the surgeon should immediately intervene to prevent a neurological complication. However, TES-MEP monitoring does not provide sufficient data to identify the non-surgery-related factors. Therefore, this study aimed to identify and describe these factors among TES-MEP alert cases. METHODS: In this multicenter study, data from 1934 patients who underwent various spinal surgeries for spinal deformities, spinal cord tumors, and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the spine from 2017 to 2019 were collected. A 70% amplitude reduction was set as the TES-MEP alarm threshold. All surgeries with alerts were categorized into true-positive (TP) and false-positive (FP) cases according to the assessment of immediate postoperative neurological deficits. RESULTS: In total, TES-MEP alerts were observed in 251 cases during surgery: 62 TP and 189 FP IONM cases. Overall, 158 cases were related to non-surgery-related factors. We observed 22 (35.5%) TP cases and 136 (72%) FP cases, which indicated cases associated with non-surgery-related factors. A significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding factors associated with TES-MEP alerts (p < 0.01). The ratio of TP and FP cases (related to non-surgery-related factors) associated with TES-MEP alerts was 13.9% (22/158 cases) and 86.1% (136/158 cases), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Non-surgery-related factors are proportionally higher in FP than in TP cases. Although the surgeon should examine surgical procedures immediately after a TES-MEP alert, surgical intervention may not always be the best approach according to the results of this study.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, observational study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of intervention after an alert in intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) using transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEPs) during surgery for thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (T-OPLL). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: T-OPLL is commonly treated with posterior decompression and fusion with instrumentation. IONM using Tc-MEPs during surgery reduces the risk of neurological complications. METHODS: The subjects were 79 patients with a Tc-MEP alert during posterior decompression and fusion surgery for T-OPLL. Preoperative muscle strength (manual muscle testing [MMT]), waveform derivation rate at the start of surgery (baseline), intraoperative waveform changes; and postoperative motor paralysis were examined. A reduction in MMT score of ≥1 on the day after surgery was classified as worsened postoperative motor deficit. An alert was defined as a decrease in Tc-MEP waveform amplitude of ≥70% from baseline. Alerts were recorded at key times during surgery. RESULTS: The patients (35 males, 44 females; age 54.6 years) had OPLL at T1-4 (n = 27, 34%), T5-8 (n = 50, 63%), and T9-12 (n = 16, 20%). The preoperative status included sensory deficit (n = 67, 85%), motor deficit (MMT ≤4) (n = 59, 75%), and nonambulatory (n = 26, 33%). At baseline, 76 cases (96%) had a detectable Tc-MEP waveform for at least one muscle, and the abductor hallucis had the highest rate of baseline waveform detection (n = 66, 84%). Tc-MEP alerts occurred during decompression (n = 47, 60%), exposure (n = 13, 16%), rodding (n = 5, 6%), pedicle screw insertion (n = 4, 5%), posture change (n = 4, 5%), dekyphosis (n = 2, 3%), and other procedures (n = 4, 5%). After intraoperative intervention, the rescue rate (no postoperative neurological deficit) was 57% (45/79), and rescue cases had a significantly better preoperative ambulatory status and a significantly higher baseline waveform derivation rate. CONCLUSION: These results show the efficacy of intraoperative intervention following a Tc-MEP alert for prevention of neurological deficit postoperatively.Level of Evidence: 2.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to study the incidence of nonneurologic adverse events related to transcranial electric stimulation (TES) for intraoperative spinal cord monitoring (IOM) with motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) (Tc(E)- MEPs) and determine the need for safety precautions. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Tc(E)-MEPs monitoring requires high-voltage multipulse TES that causes widespread muscle contraction and movement. Improved awareness of TES-induced movement-related adverse events is needed. METHODS: We analyzed data from 2643 patients who underwent high-risk spinal surgery with intraoperative Tc(E)-MEPs at 11 spinal centers from 2010 to 2016. Information about neurologic and non-neurologic postoperative complications was collected, including type of surgical procedure, operative time, estimated blood loss, and treatment for postoperative adverse events. RESULTS: A 70% drop in Tc(E)-MEPs amplitude, which was the alarm criterion to interrupt surgery, predicted postoperative motor deficits with 93.5% sensitivity, 91.0% specificity, a false-positive rate of 8.2%, and a false-negative rate of 0.3%. Non-neurologic adverse events developed in 17 (0.64%) patients and were most commonly because of bite injuries (0.57%), including 11 cases of tongue laceration, two cases of lip laceration, and two cases of tooth breakage. Four (0.15%) tongue lacerations required surgical repair with sutures and two tooth breakages required dental treatment. One patient had hair loss corresponding to the TES site. One patient, who underwent additional IOM with transpharyngeal stimulation, had severe nasal hemorrhage following electrode placement by nasal route, which resolved spontaneously. Non-neurologic adverse events did not significantly affect the accuracy of IOM assessment. Neither operative times nor blood loss significantly influenced the occurrence of adverse events. CONCLUSION: During TES-IOM, both the surgeon and monitoring team must consider the possibility-although rare-of non-neurologic adverse events, particularly bite injuries. Such complications can be minimized by using a soft bite-block and frequently evaluating the intraoral integrity of the anesthetized patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Leg spasticity in degenerative compression myelopathy causes impairment of fast and rapid repetitive movements, which tends to appear despite the disproportionate paucity of clinical weakness. As clinically useful measures used to quantify the slowness of voluntary leg movements in this pathological condition, we compared the foot tapping test (FTT) with the simple walking test, which is now considered the gold standard in this field. METHODS: We compared the FTT with the simple walking test, the grip-and-release test, and the functional scales of Nurick and the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) in 77 patients with cervical compression myelopathy and 56 age-matched healthy subjects. The FTT was conducted on both sides separately, and the subject, while being seated on a chair, moved his/her toes up and down repeatedly to tap the floor as fast and as vigorously as possible for 10 sec with his/her heels planted on the floor. RESULTS: The number of 10-sec foot tapping in the patient group significantly correlated with the Nurick grades (r = -0.566; P < 0.0001), the JOA scores (r = 0.520; P < 0.0001), and the grip-and-release rates (r = 0.609; P < 0.0001). It also significantly correlated with the 30-m walking time (r = -0.507; P < 0.0001) and the number of steps taken (r = -0.494; P < 0.0001). Assessments of wheelchair-dependent patients and side-to-side comparison, in which the simple walking test plays no role, revealed significantly fewer FTT taps in wheelchair-bound patients than in the ambulatory patients and a significant trend for cervical compression myelopathy to dominantly affect the upper and lower limbs on the same side. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to the reassessment of the currently underutilized FTT as part of a routine neurologic examination of degenerative compression myelopathy.

RESUMEN

The present study documents a phenomenon, which has received little attention despite its potential clinical importance. An 87-year-old woman presented with barely reported extravertebral gas and fluid collections probably originating from the contents of the adjacent cleft within the T10 collapsed osteoporotic vertebra. Her chief complaint was intractable pain radiating over the left thorax suggestive of intercostal neuralgia. The pain intensified when sitting up from a lateral decubitus position, correlating with a posture-related radiologic change of the intravertebral cleft, which appeared with a decubitus position and disappeared with a sitting position. Because these extravertebral collections were located where the 10th thoracic nerve root just exits the intervertebral foramina, her chest pain of a posture-dependent nature most likely resulted from nerve root compression by extravertebral gas and fluid forced out of the vertebral cleft. Posterior spinal fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation resulted in a complete resolution of the chest pain with disappearance of the extravertebral gas and fluid accumulations. An awareness of the possibility that the intravertebral cleft could communicate with the extravertebral space close to the nerve root will help avoid neurologic complications caused by bone cement leakage during vertebroplasty.

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter study. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the incidence of intraoperative spinal neuromonitoring (IONM) alerts and neurological complications, as well as to determine which interventions are most effective at preventing postoperative neurological complications following IONM alerts in high risk spinal surgeries. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: IONM may play a role in identifying and preventing neural damage; however, few studies have clarified the outcomes of intervention after IONM alerts. METHODS: We analyzed 2867 patients who underwent surgery for high risk spinal pathology using transcranial electrical motor-evoked potentials from 2010 to 2016. The high-risk spinal surgery cases consisted of 1009 spinal deformity cases, 622 cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) cases, 249 thoracic-OPLL cases, 771 extramedullary spinal cord tumor cases, and 216 intramedullary spinal cord tumor (IMSCT) cases. We set a 70% amplitude reduction as the alarm threshold for transcranial electrical motor-evoked potentials and analyzed the outcomes of the interventions following monitoring alerts and postoperative neurological deficits. RESULTS: The true positive, false positive, true negative, false negative, and rescue cases of IONM comprised 126, 234, 2362, 9, and 136 cases, respectively. Most alerts and interventions occurred during correction and release in deformity cases, posterior decompression and dekyphosis in OPLL cases, and tumor resection and surgery suspension with steroid injection in spinal cord tumor cases; however, individual interventions varied. The rescue rates (number of patients rescued with intervention after IONM alert/number of true positive cases plus rescue cases) for deformity, cervical-OPLL, thoracic--OPLL, extramedullary spinal cord tumor, and IMSCT cases were 61.4% (35/57), 82.1% (32/39), 40% (20/50), 52.5% (31/59), and 31.6% (18/57), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our prospective multicenter study identified potential neural damage in 9.5% of cases and 52% rescue cases using IONM. Although the rescue ratios for t-OPLL and IMSCT were relatively low, appropriate intervention immediately after an IONM alert may prevent neural damage even in high-risk spinal surgeries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This study reports on a 67-year-old woman with partial Brown-Séquard syndrome due to a recurrent cervical neurenteric cyst at C3 to C4. The myelopathic symptoms reappeared 22 years after a previous shunting operation performed posteriorly with a silicone tube connecting the intradural cervical cyst cavity to the subarachnoid space. We have now succeeded in removing the cyst nearly completely with the anterior approach. The surgical procedure consisted of right vertebral artery exposure at C3 and C4 and a subtotal corpectomy of C3 followed by microdissection of the cyst, duraplasty, and iliac strut graft fusion. Spinal cord monitoring with motor-evoked potential studies helped us safely dissect the cyst wall tightly adhering to the spinal cord. Duraplasty with Gore-Tex patch-grafting in conjunction with postoperative lumbar subarachnoid drainage worked well in preventing a spinal fluid fistula. At two years after surgery, the patient showed a nearly complete return of function without any recurrence of the cyst.