RESUMEN
Calciphylaxis or calciphic uremic arteriolopathy (CUA) is a rare syndrome characterized by the deposition of calcium within the walls of small and medium size vessels in the dermis and in the subcutaneous tissue. The disease mainly affects patients with end-stage renal disease. We report here our experience with 4 cases of calciphylaxis in dialysis patients. The main predisposing factor observed in our 4 patients was warfarin use (2 patients, 50%), while local traumas and diabetes were respectively present in only one patient. None of our patients was obese. Lower legs were the most frequently involved site of CUA (3/4 patients, 75%). In our experience biopsy was crucial to achieve a correct diagnosis and did not cause aggravation of the ulcers. Therapeutic approach was multimodal: mainly hyperbaric oxygen therapy, cinacalcet and sodium thiosulphate. Although many recent case reports have shown exceptional results and healing with the use of sodium thiosulphate, we did not experience any change in the poor prognosis of our patients with the use of this drug, at a dosage of 5 g thrice weekly endovenously.
Asunto(s)
Calcifilaxia/etiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Úlcera de la Pierna/etiología , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Biopsia , Calcifilaxia/diagnóstico , Calcifilaxia/patología , Cinacalcet , Terapia Combinada , Resultado Fatal , Femenino , Soluciones para Hemodiálisis/efectos adversos , Soluciones para Hemodiálisis/química , Heparina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Úlcera de la Pierna/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Naftalenos/uso terapéutico , Pronóstico , Úlcera Cutánea/etiología , Tiosulfatos/uso terapéutico , Warfarina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
With the introduction of the on-line preparation of dialysis fluids, the hemofiltration technique, which has never had a widespread diffusion in its old version with the infusion bags, has gained a new interest. We planned a prospective, randomized, 3-year-long study comparing survival and morbidity in ultrapure bicarbonate dialysis (BD) with on-line predilution hemofiltration (HF). Since comorbidity is one of the main factors limiting survival, the study was addressed to patients with a severe degree of comorbidity. The paper presents the preliminary results of the trial. Sixty-four patients were enrolled and randomized to either BD (N = 32) or HF (N = 32). Mean age and dialysis vintage were comparable. Twenty patients died during the study, 12 in BD and 8 in HF. The relative risk of death was 11% higher in patients treated with BD compared to those in the HF group (p < 0.005). The number of hospitalisation events per single patient was lower, even though not significantly, in HF compared to BD (1.94 + 1.26 in HF vs 2.48 + 1.98 in BD, p = NS). As concerns biochemistry, apart from beta-2-microglobulin, any other substantial difference was not found during the study, though the small solute concentration was generally a little more elevated in HF than in BD. Dialysis hypotension showed a trend to decrease in both the dialysis modalities up to near half of the trial, then, during the last year, it remained quite stable in HF, while, on the contrary, it increased in the BD group. By the end of the protocol, patients in HF showed a 2.5% incidence of acute dialysis hypotension, while patients in BD had 23%.
Asunto(s)
Bicarbonatos/uso terapéutico , Hemofiltración/métodos , Diálisis Renal , Anciano , Sangre/metabolismo , Hemodinámica , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Microglobulina beta-2/sangreRESUMEN
The antiproteinuric efficacy of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) has been extensively investigated in patients with several types of nephropathy, but there are few data on the use of ACEI in patients with primary glomerular disease without renal function impairment. We evaluate the effect of long-term therapy with captopril on arterial pressure and proteinuria in 13 patients with primary glomerular disease, selected on the following criteria: persistent proteinuria greater than 600 mg/day, serum creatinine less than or equal to 1.5 mg/dl, no dietary restriction or antihypertensive or immunosuppressive therapy for at least 9 months prior to enrolment. Ten of 13 patients were normotensive. The treatment with captopril induced an early and persistent decrease in proteinuria (41%), and a significant increase in serum albumin. We did not find a significant correlation between changes in MAP and changes in protein loss or between variations in serum creatinine and in proteinuria. Our results demonstrate that captopril is effective in reducing proteinuria in patients with primary glomerular disease with normal renal function. Since the antiproteinuric effect is not associated to a concomitant decrease in arterial pressure, we presume that it might be due to a specific intrarenal action of captopril.