RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Because of invasive nature of catheterization, using other noninvasive tools is more preferred to assess pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The present study assessed the value of chest spiral CT scan and Doppler echocardiography compared to right heart catheterization (RHC) to predict PAH in patients with scleroderma. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed on 15 patients with limited scleroderma. All subjects underwent Doppler echocardiography (to assess PAP) and chest spiral CT scan without injection (to assess pulmonary trunk length or PUL), followed by RHC to assess PAH. RESULTS: Comparing PUL in spiral CT scan with PAP in RHC yielded a sensitivity of 75.0% and a specificity of 100% for predicting PAH. Similarly, comparing PAP value in echocardiography with PAP in RHC achieved a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 63.6% to discriminate PAH from normal PAP condition. Analysis of the area under the ROC curve showed high power of CT scan to predict PAH (AUC = 1.000). The best cutoff point for PUL to predict PAH was 29.95 yielding a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 100%. Also, ROC curve analysis showed high value of echocardiography to discriminate PAH from normal PAP status (AUC = 0.841) that considering a cutoff value of 22.88 for PAP assessed by echocardiography reached to a sensitivity of 72.7% and a specificity of 100%. Conclusion: Both chest spiral CT scan and Doppler echocardiography are very useful to diagnose PAH and its severity in patients with scleroderma.
Asunto(s)
Hipertensión Pulmonar , Hipertensión Arterial Pulmonar , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Estudios Transversales , Ecocardiografía Doppler , Humanos , Hipertensión Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Hipertensión Pulmonar/etiología , Tomografía Computarizada Espiral , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Sofosbuvir and daclatasvir are direct-acting antivirals highly effective against hepatitis C virus. There is some in silico and in vitro evidence that suggests these agents may also be effective against SARS-CoV-2. This trial evaluated the effectiveness of sofosbuvir in combination with daclatasvir in treating patients with COVID-19. METHODS: Patients with a positive nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2 on RT-PCR or bilateral multi-lobar ground-glass opacity on their chest CT and signs of severe COVID-19 were included. Subjects were divided into two arms with one arm receiving ribavirin and the other receiving sofosbuvir/daclatasvir. All participants also received the recommended national standard treatment which, at that time, was lopinavir/ritonavir and single-dose hydroxychloroquine. The primary endpoint was time from starting the medication until discharge from hospital with secondary endpoints of duration of ICU stay and mortality. RESULTS: Sixty-two subjects met the inclusion criteria, with 35 enrolled in the sofosbuvir/daclatasvir arm and 27 in the ribavirin arm. The median duration of stay was 5 days for the sofosbuvir/daclatasvir group and 9 days for the ribavirin group. The mortality in the sofosbuvir/daclatasvir group was 2/35 (6%) and 9/27 (33%) for the ribavirin group. The relative risk of death for patients treated with sofosbuvir/daclatasvir was 0.17 (95% CI 0.04-0.73, P = 0.02) and the number needed to treat for benefit was 3.6 (95% CI 2.1-12.1, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Given these encouraging initial results, and the current lack of treatments proven to decrease mortality in COVID-19, further investigation in larger-scale trials seems warranted.