RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Promoting safe patient mobility for providers and patients is a safety priority in the hospital setting. Safe patient handling equipment aids safe mobility but can also deter active movement by the patient if used inappropriately. Nurses need guidance to choose equipment that ensures their safety and that of the patients while promoting active mobility and preventing workplace-related injury. METHODS: Using a modified Delphi approach with a diverse group of experts, we created the Johns Hopkins Safe Patient Handling Mobility (JH-SPHM) Guide. This diverse group of 10 experts consisted of nurses, nurse leaders, physical and occupational therapists, safe patient handling committee representatives, and a fall prevention committee leader. The application of the tool was then tested in the hospital environment by two physical therapists. FINDINGS: Consensus was reached for safe patient handling (SPH) equipment recommendations at each level of the Johns Hopkins Mobility Goal Calculator (JH-Mobility Goal Calculator). Expert SPH equipment recommendations were then added to JH-Mobility Goal Calculator levels to create the JH-Safe Patient Handling Mobility Guide. JH-Safe Patient Handling Mobility Guide equipment suggestions were compared with equipment recommendations from physical therapists revealing strong agreement (n = 125, 88%). CONCLUSION: The newly created JH-Safe Patient Handling Mobility Guide provides appropriate safe patient-handling equipment recommendations to help accomplish patients' daily mobility goals. APPLICATIONS TO PRACTICE: The Johns Hopkins Safe Patient Handling Mobility Guide simultaneously facilitates patient mobility and optimizes safety for nursing staff through recommendations for safe patient-handling equipment for use with hospitalized patients.
RESUMEN
Maintaining cerebral perfusion in the early stages of recovery after stroke is paramount. Autoregulatory function may be impaired during this period leaving cerebral perfusion directly reliant on intravascular volume and blood pressure (BP) with increased risk for expanding cerebral infarction during periods of low BP and hemorrhagic transformation during BP elevations. We suspected that dysautonomia is common during the acute period related to both pre-existing vascular risk factors and potentially independent of such conditions. Thus, we sought to understand the state of the science specific to dysautonomia and acute stroke. The scoping review search included multiple databases and key terms related to acute stroke and dysautonomia. The team employed a rigorous review process to identify, evaluate, and summarize relevant literature. We additionally summarized common clinical approaches used to detect dysautonomia at the bedside. The purpose of this scoping review is to understand the state of the science for the identification, treatment, and impact of dysautonomia on acute stroke patient outcomes. There is a high prevalence of dysautonomia among persons with stroke, though there is significant variability in the type of measures and definitions used to diagnose dysautonomia. While dysautonomia appears to be associated with poor functional outcome and post-stroke complications, there is a paucity of high-quality evidence, and generalizability is limited by heterogenous approaches to these studies. There is a need to establish common definitions, standard measurement tools, and a roadmap for incorporating these measures into clinical practice so that larger studies can be conducted.