RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Aminoglycosides are relatively potent antibiotics used against some life-threatening infections but contribute to ototoxicity. Although the beneficial effects of high-dose nigella sativa oil (NSO) on ototoxicity in the form of intratympanic or oral use have been demonstrated, no variable-dose studies have been conducted on this subject. We aimed to investigate the potential protective effect of different doses of intraperitoneal (i.p.) NSO on Gentamicin (GM)-induced ototoxicity with auditory brainstem responses (ABR) testing. METHODS: Thirty adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (300-400 gr) were used in this study. Rats were randomly divided into 5 groups, with six animals in each group: All the groups received GM (120 mg/kg i.p) for ten days. Group 1: 0.9% saline solution (0.3 ml/kg i.p.), Group 2: NSOL (low dose 0.1 ml/kg i.p.), Group 3: NSOM (median dose 0.3 ml/kg i.p.), Group 4: NSOH (high dose 3 ml/kg i.p.), Group 5: NSOML (late onset median dose 0.3 ml/kg i.p) were given for fifteen days. But death occurred in 3 rats in group 4 and they were excluded from the study. The pretreatment and posttreatment ABR testings were performed. RESULTS: The posttreatment ABR results were compared with the pretreatment values. A significant difference was found in group 1 (p:0,002), group 2 (p: 0,040), and group 4 (p: 0,027). When the posttreatment tests were compared with each other, there was a significant difference between groups 1 and 2 (p < 0,001), groups 1 and 3 (p < 0,001), and groups 1 and 5 (p < 0,001). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of 0.1 ml/kg and 3 ml/kg dose of NSO does not prevent ototoxicity. The 0.3 ml/kg dose of NSO effectively prevents GM-induced ototoxicity within both prophylactic and therapeutic use.
Asunto(s)
Gentamicinas , Ototoxicidad , Ratas , Masculino , Animales , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Gentamicinas/toxicidad , Ototoxicidad/etiología , Ototoxicidad/prevención & control , Aceites de Plantas/farmacología , Antibacterianos/toxicidadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aims to compare percutaneous tracheostomy (PCT) and surgical tracheostomy's aerosol and droplet scattering by using a particle counter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was carried out with 35 patients between October 2020 and June 2021. All personal protective equipment was provided to protect healthcare workers. Measurements were made in the 5 s period before the tracheal incision and the 5 s period after the tracheal incision. RESULTS: The mean age of the 15 female and 20 male patients in this study was 68.88 ± 13.48 years old (range: 33-95 years old). Patients were intubated for an average of 22 days. Particle amounts were found to be significantly higher at 5 µm (p = 0.003) and 10 µm (p = 0.012) during PCT. In surgical tracheostomy, there was no significant increase in the number of particles. When the particle measurement values of both methods were compared with each other, there was a significantly more particle scattering in PCT than in surgical tracheotomy at 0.3 µm (p = 0.034), 5 µm (p = 0.001), and 10 µm (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: According to the data in our study, a surgical tracheotomy was not identified as an aerosol-generating procedure. Considering the risk of airborne transmission may increase due to viral mutations, we have shown that surgical tracheostomy may be more appropriate in patients who need a tracheostomy. Of course, the use of personal protective equipment during these processes is very important.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Traqueostomía , Adulto , Aerosoles , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Equipo de Protección Personal , Traqueostomía/métodos , TraqueotomíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We aimed to analyze particle scattering during common otolaryngology examination procedures which are associated with aerosol-generating procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted with 109 volunteer patients who have participated between October 2020 and January 2021. We measured aerosol and droplet production during oropharyngeal examination, anterior rhinoscopy, rigid nasopharyngoscopy, and rigid laryngoscopy. Measurements were calculated at the beginning of the examinations and during the otolaryngological examination procedures. RESULTS: There was no significant increase when we compared the particle scattering in each examination procedure with the basal measurements. But at the end of all examination methods for each patient, there was a significant increase at each micrometer. When all examination methods are compared with each other, particle increases in the oropharyngeal examination with larger particle sizes than 0,5 µm were found to be higher than other examination methods. We analyzed six patients' measurements, who coughed, gagged, or sneezed during the nasal endoscopy procedure, there was a significant increase in terms of 0,3 µm particle scattering. CONCLUSION: When all examination methods are performed together, there is a significant particle increase in all particle sizes in the examination room at the end of the examinations. This causes otolaryngologists to be exposed to a significant particle increase at each micrometer. Because of this reason, otolaryngologists should be careful and should wear personal protective equipment while examining patients.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional , Aerosoles , Humanos , Equipo de Protección Personal , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare different therapy methods used for sudden sensorineural hearing losses, to determine the prognostic factors and particularly to investigate the importance of starting the therapy within the first three days of the prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1995 and December 2008, the files of 213 patients who were treated in our clinic were reviewed. A total of 155 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. The study groups were classified according to the prognostic and audiometric factors. RESULTS: With regard to the effectiveness of treatment options, post-treatment audiometric improvement was significantly better in the patients treated with carbogen in addition to the medical therapy compared to the other groups (p=0.018). In terms of the patient characteristics at the time of admission, having vertigo, presence of a descending type audiogram curve and severe hearing loss affected the success of treatment negatively, while mild hearing loss and presence of an ascending type audiogram curve had a positive effect. The recovery rate was higher in patients who were admitted within the first three days (p=0.005). CONCLUSION: It was found that starting the therapy within the first three days and adding the carbogen to the conventional medical treatment may improve the outcome of the treatment.
Asunto(s)
Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/diagnóstico , Pérdida Auditiva Súbita/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Audiometría , Dióxido de Carbono/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/etiología , Pérdida Auditiva Súbita/etiología , Pruebas Auditivas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxígeno/uso terapéutico , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , VértigoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Frey syndrome is one of the most common complications following parotid surgery. The current most common test for objectively diagnosing Frey syndrome is Minor starch-iodine test. This test might be insufficient because its results are not quantitative and therefore tests with quantitative results are investigated. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficiency of galvanic skin response (GSR) test, which measures changes in skin resistance, as a method with quantitative results for diagnosis of Frey syndrome. METHODS: Thirty patients who underwent superficial parotidectomy were assessed postoperatively (mean, 24.7 ± 25.7 months; range, 6-109 months). Patients completed a symptomatic evaluation questionnaire and underwent Minor starch-iodine test and GSR. RESULTS: Diagnostic validity of GSR test was found to be >2.91 following analysis. Sensitivity and specificity of this value were 100% and 55%, respectively, based on symptomatic assessment. Sensitivity and specificity were 87.5% and 57.1%, respectively, based on Minor starch-iodine test. CONCLUSIONS: When compared to symptomatic evaluation of patients who underwent superficial parotidectomy, GSR test was shown to be 100% sensitive in diagnosing Frey syndrome and quantitative results of GSR test could determine severity of Frey syndrome.
Asunto(s)
Respuesta Galvánica de la Piel/fisiología , Glándula Parótida/fisiopatología , Glándula Parótida/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Sudoración Gustativa/diagnóstico , Sudoración Gustativa/fisiopatología , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the reliability of SleepStrip as a screening test in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-two patients (50 males, 22 females; mean age 51.4±11.1 years; range 20 to 74 years) with OSAS were included in this prospective, non-randomized double-blinded single cohort study between May 2008 and February 2009. Patients who underwent an attended overnight polysomnography (PSG) and consented to participate in the study were asked to use SleepStrip device within the week following PSG recording. The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was compared with the SleepStrip score (Sscore). RESULTS: The mean body mass index of patients was 31.1±4.3. Both AHI and Sscore were obtained in 64 patients. There was a strong correlation between Sscore and AHI (r=0.76, p<0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of the SleepStrip were 94.4% and 93.5% when used to diagnose cases with AHI = or >40. The sensitivity and specificity of the SleepStrip was reduced to 80% and 87.2% when AHI threshold was chosen as = or >25 and 83.3% and 76.5% for AHI = or >15 respectively. CONCLUSION: There is a strong correlation between SleepStrip and AHI. SleepStrip was found to be effective in diagnosing severe OSAS with AHI = or >40, however, its diagnostic capability was reduced in patients with lower AHI's who constitute the main target of screening.
Asunto(s)
Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/instrumentación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polisomnografía , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Síndromes de la Apnea del Sueño/diagnóstico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of preincisional peritonsillar infiltration of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine on post-tonsillectomy pain in children. METHODS: Sixty children undergoing elective tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy were randomly allocated into three groups before tonsillectomy: peritonsillar infiltrations with 0.25% levobupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine (group levobupivacaine, n=20), 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine (group bupivacaine, n=20), and normal saline (group saline, n=20) were applied. Pain was evaluated by using a modified Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (mCHEOPS). Choice of additional analgesic was acetaminophen for all patients. RESULTS: mCHEOPS values at 0th (immediately) and 30th minute after arrival the PACU were lower in both the local anesthetics groups than the saline group (p<0.001, p<0.01 for the group levobupivacaine; p<0.001, p<0.05 for the group bupivacaine, respectively). In addition, mCHEOPS values at 1st hour in the ward was lower in the group bupivacaine when compared to the group saline (p<0.05). Analgesic requirements and the time to first analgesia required, were also significantly different between the local anesthetic and saline groups (p<0.05 for both local anesthetics groups). Time to first mobilization was shorter in both local anesthetic groups when compared to the saline group (p<0.05 for both local anesthetic groups). CONCLUSION: Preincisional peritonsillar infiltration with levobupivacaine or bupivacaine before tonsillectomy, are effective than saline, in reducing early post-tonsillectomy pain, where as bupivacaine had slightly longer effect. Compared to saline, with both anesthetic infiltrations, lesser medication for analgesia is required. The clinical trial registration number (Research Ethics Committee of Medical Faculty, Uludag University): 2008-4/36, 19 February 2008.