Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc ; 55(4): 457-68, 2013 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24113504

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: After withdrawal of aprotinin in 2008 only tranexamic acid (TxA, Cyclocapron, Pfitzer, Germany) remains available as antihyperfibrinolytic agent in Europe. Dosage (from 1 g to 20 g) and application strategy (single shot i.v., infusion i.v., topical) reflect an indiscriminate use of TXA in cardiac surgery. We use data analysis of three registries to evaluate safety issues and sufficiency of different TxA dosages in our center. METHODS: Registry 1: Single shot ultra-low dose TxA (1 g in priming volume). Registry 2: Single shot medium dose TxA (5 g in priming volume). Registry 3: Single shot medium dose TxA (3 g in priming volume) and continuous, weight-adapted administration during cross clamping. Independence of surgeon's preference was achieved by changing dosage every surgery day regardless of operation schedule. RESULTS: Data analysis was carried out on 1182 consecutive, elective patients (1 g TxA n = 415; 3 g + x g TA n = 367; mean TxA dose 4.4 g ± 1.0 g; 5 g TxA n = 400). Patient characteristics were well matched in all three registries (mean age: 69 ± 9.5y, BMI 28.2 ± 4.7, Creatinin 107.5 ± 52.8 µM), as were performed surgical procedures (excluding organ transplantation). Postoperative data showed no significant differences for blood loss and major adverse events (1 g vs. 3 + g vs. 5 g: blood loss: 894 ± 1479 vs. 903 ± 1282 vs. 1004 ± 1604 ml; stroke: 1.5 vs. 1.6 vs. 1.5%; myocardial infarction 2.7 vs. 3.3 vs. 1.3%; 30d mortality 3.9 vs. 4.2 vs. 4.8%, respectively). Secondary endpoints (de novo dialysis, transfusion requirement, ICU and total treatment time) showed no significant differences between registries. CONCLUSION: Use of 1 g TxA is safe and sufficient for elective patients with on pump cardiac surgery and thus has been established as strategy of choice in our center.


Asunto(s)
Antifibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Ácido Tranexámico/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Antifibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Ácido Tranexámico/efectos adversos
2.
J Hosp Infect ; 81(4): 278-82, 2012 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22705297

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) after median sternotomy represent a serious complication and a high potential risk for adverse clinical outcome after cardiac surgery. The antimicrobial skin sealant InteguSeal® was introduced as a novel tool in preventing development of SSI. AIM: This single-centre investigation used two prospective registries to evaluate the prophylactic effect of a cyanoacrylate-based antimicrobial skin sealant (InteguSeal®) on the incidence of postoperative mediastinitis or any other form of chest skin incision SSI after elective cardiac surgery. METHODS: Between October 2010 and April 2011 a total of 998 patients underwent elective cardiac surgical procedures with median sternotomy in our centre. In 496 patients InteguSeal® was included in standard preoperative preparation procedures before chest skin incision (group 1). In 502 patients standard preoperative skin preparation procedures were used without InteguSeal® (group 2). Freedom from mediastinitis and from any other form of SSI within 30 postoperative days were the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively. FINDINGS: A total of 983 patients were eligible for inclusion in per-protocol analysis (488 vs 495 patients). The incidence of postoperative mediastinitis was 2.3% in group 1 vs 3.2% in group 2 (not significant). The incidence of any form of SSI was 10.9% in group 1 vs 11.5% in group 2 (not significant). Perioperative patient characteristics, complexity of surgical procedures performed and length of hospitalization were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: The use of InteguSeal® has no influence on the incidence of postoperative SSI and mediastinitis after cardiac surgery with median sternotomy.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Mediastinitis/epidemiología , Mediastinitis/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Cirugía Torácica , Adhesivos Tisulares/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Cianoacrilatos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Piel , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) ; 53(5): 671-6, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22406963

RESUMEN

AIM: Identification of patients at high risk for readmission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) after cardiac surgery is paramount. We evaluated the clinical characteristics of readmitted patients and identified perioperative prognostic variables for ICU readmission. METHODS: A total of 7105 patients who underwent cardiac surgery between 2007 and 2010 and discharged after a primary stay in the ICU were reviewed retrospectively. Of these, 7.8% (554) patients were readmitted. The reasons for readmission and postoperative course were analyzed. Perioperative risk factors for readmission were determined by multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Mortality of patients after readmission was 13.6% compared with 0.2% without recidivism (P<0.0001). Mean length of stay in hospital of patients requiring readmission was 24.9 ± 19.1 days and significantly longer compared to all other patients 12.3±8.4 days (P<0.0001). The main reasons for readmission were respiratory failure (39.0%) and cardiovascular instability (26.2%). Complex cardiac surgery, aortic surgery and extended stay in the ICU were the most powerful variables to predict ICU readmission. CONCLUSION: ICU readmission was related to complex surgery and associated with impaired outcome. Respiratory complications were the most common reasons for readmission. Predictive renal and pulmonary risk factors indicate the need of preoperative preconditioning and patient selection.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Readmisión del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidad , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Alemania , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
4.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 59(7): 406-10, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21442579

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is an established therapy to support patients with heart failure during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The impact of the timing of IABP on the hospital course and on follow-up is of particular clinical interest. The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between the time of IABP implantation and its impact on early, mid- and long-term survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who underwent emergent CABG for NSTEMI and STEMI. METHODS: A total of 472 patients with AMI (NSTEMI and STEMI) underwent emergency CABG at our institution; 158 of them additionally received IABP support. Fifty-seven (36 %) patients received preoperative and 101 (64 %) patients underwent intraoperative IABP implantation. Endpoints were in-hospital und follow-up (mean duration 37 ± 28 months) survival. RESULTS: Overall in-hospital mortality was 17.1 % (n = 27): 17.6 % (n = 10) in the preoperative group and 16.8 % (n = 17) in the intraoperative group ( P = ns). Mid- and long-term survival rates were comparable for both groups 78.6 % vs. 73.7 %, 71.4 % vs. 68.7 % and 64.3 % vs. 54.6 % at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively ( P = ns). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that CABG with IABP support in high-risk patients with AMI can be performed with acceptable in-hospital and long-term survival rates. The decision for IABP placement should consider the preoperative clinical condition and the intraoperative course of each patient. IABP placement does not appear to affect the long-term outcome after isolated CABG in patients with AMI.


Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico , Infarto del Miocardio/cirugía , Sobrevivientes , Anciano , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Femenino , Alemania , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico/efectos adversos , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico/mortalidad , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Sobrevivientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA