Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 14: 57, 2016 Apr 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27062133

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Electronic formats of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are now routinely used in clinical research studies. When changing from a validated paper and pen to electronic administration it is necessary to establish their equivalence. This study reports on the value of Rasch analysis in this process. METHODS: Three groups of US pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients participated. The first completed an electronic version of the CAMPHOR Activity Limitation scale (e-sample) and this was compared with two pen and paper administrated samples (pp1 and pp2). The three databases were combined and analysed for fit to the Rasch model. Equivalence was evaluated by differential item functioning (DIF) analyses. RESULTS: The three datasets were matched randomly in terms of sample size (n = 147). Mean age (years) and percentage of male respondents were as follows: e-sample (51.7, 16.0 %); pp1 (50.0, 14.0 %); pp2 (55.5, 40.4 %). The combined dataset achieved fit to the Rasch model. Two items showed evidence of borderline DIF. Further analyses showed the inclusion of these items had little impact on Rasch estimates indicating the DIF identified was unimportant. CONCLUSIONS: Differences between the performance of the electronic and pen and paper administrations of the CAMPHOR Activity Limitation scale were minor. The results were successful in showing how the Rasch model can be used to determine the equivalence of alternative formats of PRO measures.


Asunto(s)
Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Hipertensión Pulmonar/psicología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Papel , Pacientes/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Benchmarking , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Teóricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
2.
BMJ Case Rep ; 20152015 Jan 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25568267

RESUMEN

We present an unusual case of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) mimicking diverticulitis in a 76-year-old man with a 16-year history of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and a 2 cm left renal mass. The patient presented with severe abdominal pain and lower gastrointestinal bleeding with anticoagulation from recent pulmonary embolism. His clinical course was troubled by recurrent hospitalisations and complications that delayed investigations and potential treatments. Radiographic findings revealed stable CLL, mild sigmoid diverticulitis and a small renal mass. Small renal masses (less than 4 cm) are considered low risk for metastasising and are, thus, often observed or ablated, rather than resected. Furthermore, gastrointestinal metastases from RCC are rare. This case adds new perspective to the unpredictable nature of RCC and how synchronous malignancies may be masked in patients with long-standing CLL.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Diverticulitis/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Sigmoide/diagnóstico , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Renales/complicaciones , Carcinoma de Células Renales/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Resultado Fatal , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/complicaciones , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico , Masculino , Enfermedades del Sigmoide/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA