RESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVE: In 2014, Maryland launched a population-based payment model that replaced fee-for-service payments with global budgets for all hospital-based services. This global budget revenue program gives hospitals strong incentives to tightly control patient volume and meet budget targets. We examine the effects of the global budget revenue model on rates of admission to the hospital from emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: We used medical record and billing data to examine adult ED encounters from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2015, in 25 hospital-based EDs, including 10 Maryland global budget revenue hospitals, 10 matched non-Maryland hospitals (primary control), and 5 Maryland Total Patient Revenue hospitals (secondary control). Total Patient Revenue hospitals adopted global budgeting in 2010 under a pilot Maryland program targeting rural hospitals. We conducted difference-in-differences analyses for overall ED admission rates, ED admission rates for ambulatory-care-sensitive conditions and non-ambulatory-care-sensitive conditions, and for clinical conditions that commonly lead to admission. RESULTS: In 3,175,210 ED encounters, the ED admission rate for Maryland global budget revenue hospitals decreased by 0.6% (95% confidence interval -0.8% to -0.4%) compared with that for non-Maryland controls after global budget revenue implementation, a 3.0% relative decline, and decreased by 1.9% (95% confidence interval -2.2% to -1.7%) compared with that for Total Patient Revenue hospitals, a 9.5% relative decline. Relative declines in ED admission rates were similar for ambulatory-care-sensitive-condition and non-ambulatory-care-sensitive-condition encounters. Admission rate declines varied across clinical conditions. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the global budget revenue model led to statistically significant although modest declines in ED admission rates within its first 2 years, with declines in ED admissions most pronounced among certain clinical conditions.
Asunto(s)
Presupuestos/métodos , Economía Hospitalaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Economía Hospitalaria/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Maryland/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Admisión del Paciente/economíaRESUMEN
PROBLEM: Veterans eligible for health care in the Veterans Administration (VA) health system often receive care in community emergency Departments. In line with initiatives from Joining Forces and the American Academy of Nursing, emergency departments have an opportunity to screen for veterans during routine ED visits and provide resource information regarding various VA services. METHODS: Our aims were to design and implement a screening process to identify veterans during an ED visit, notify ED providers of veteran status, and develop a Veteran Resource Guide to be distributed at the time of discharge. We embedded the mandatory question, "Have you ever served in the military?" in the electronic medical record (EMR). This question was asked of all patients 18 years and older. RESULTS: During an 80-day period, we screened 9364 patients and identified 415 veterans who would not be known to the providers using standard methods. We were able to deliver the Veteran Resource Guide to 77 of the 277 veterans discharged home. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The addition of the mandatory question about military service to the EMR during the primary care assessment successfully identified veterans who presented for care in a community emergency department. Future initiatives should include automated processes to ensure that the Veteran Resource Guide is provided and to foster collaboration between community emergency departments and the VA.