Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Rev Cardiovasc Med ; 25(7): 243, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39139444

RESUMEN

Background: As the prevalence of coronary artery disease rises, the demand for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) increases. A common complication after CABG is postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF), which is linked to adverse clinical outcomes. N-acetylcysteine (NAC), an antioxidant, may mitigate oxidative stress and reduce the incidence of POAF. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the efficacy of NAC in preventing POAF after CABG. Methods: The meta-analysis was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We systematically searched multiple databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, and ScienceDirect, to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The intervention groups received perioperative NAC therapy, while the control groups received a placebo. The outcomes assessed were POAF incidence, all-cause mortality, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Review Manager 5.3 was used to conduct the meta-analysis. Results: Eleven RCTs involving 648 patients were included. The NAC group comprised 326 patients, while the control group comprised 322 patients. In the pooled analysis, patients in the NAC group had a significantly lower incidence of POAF (odds ratios (OR) = 0.57; 95% confidence intervals (CI) = 0.33 to 0.97; p = 0.04) and a shorter hospital LOS (weighted mean differences (WMD) = -0.66; 95% CI = -1.22 to -0.10; p = 0.02) compared to the control group. However, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality. Conclusions: The perioperative administration of NAC can effectively reduce the incidence of POAF and hospital LOS in CABG patients. However, larger RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.

2.
Asian J Surg ; 47(1): 35-42, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37704475

RESUMEN

A minimally invasive approach through right mini-thoracotomy for redo mitral valve surgery may improve patients' outcomes compared to median sternotomy. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of both procedures according to the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium (MVARC). This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Literature searching was performed in several databases including PubMed, EBSCOhost, Scopus, and Proquest up to 28 February 2022. Meta-analysis using proportions or means was applied. A total of 13 retrospective cohort articles were included in this study. The incidence of in-hospital mortality (3% vs 9.2%, OR = 0.35; 95% CI: 0.21-0.58; P ≤ 0.0001), reintervention for bleeding (3.8% vs 5.9%, OR = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.32-0.97; P = 0.04), and acute renal failure (5% vs 12%, OR = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.23-0.65; P = 0.0003) was significantly lower in mini-thoracotomy (MINI) group compared to median sternotomy (STER) group. The incidence of neurologic events (3.4% vs 5.5%, OR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.4-1.08; P = 0.1) and arrhythmia (19.5% vs 25.5%, OR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.38-1.09; P = 0.1) were also lower in MINI group compared to STER group but was not significant statistically. No significant differences were found in myocardial infarct (1% vs 1%, OR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.06-8.85; P = 0.79) between MINI and STER group. A minimally invasive surgery through right mini-thoracotomy is associated with a lower incidence of in-hospital mortality, reintervention for bleeding, and acute renal failure. It is a safe alternative to median sternotomy for redo mitral valve surgery.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Humanos , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Esternotomía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Toracotomía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Vasc Specialist Int ; 39: 36, 2023 Nov 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37946370

RESUMEN

Purpose: : Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) plays an important role in the pathophysiology of acute limb ischemia, leading to damage to distant organs, including the lungs. A complex mechanism is involved in the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), release of inflammatory mediators, and neutrophil activation. One strategy to reduce the damage is administering selenium, an antioxidant enzyme component that can bind ROS and protect cells. This study aimed to compare the degree of lung injury due to limb IRI in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats with selenium administration versus those without selenium treatment. Materials and Methods: : Fifteen male SD rats were divided into three groups: the control group (Group A), the ischemia-reperfusion with pre-reperfusion selenium (Group B), and the ischemia-reperfusion with post-reperfusion selenium (Group C). All animals underwent two hours of limb ischemia and three hours of reperfusion. Selenium was given intravenously at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg body weight. After reperfusion, lung specimens were histopathologically examined. Results: : The median degree of lung injury was severe in Group A, mild in Group B, and moderate in Group C (P=0.01). Post hoc analysis revealed a significant difference in the degree of lung injury between Groups A and B (P=0.01), while a comparison between Groups A and C (P=0.06) and Groups B and C (P=0.31) revealed no significant difference. Conclusion: : The administration of pre-reperfusion selenium significantly decreases lung injury induced by limb ischemia-reperfusion in SD rats.

4.
J Clin Med ; 12(17)2023 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37685784

RESUMEN

Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is a frequent procedure used in concomitant cardiac surgery. However, uncertainty still exists concerning the optimal extent of lesion sets. Hence, the objective of this study was to assess the results of various ablation techniques, aiming to offer a reference for clinical decision making. This review is listed in the prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) under ID CRD42023412785. A comprehensive search was conducted across eight databases (Scopus, Google Scholar, EBSCOHost, PubMed, Medline, Wiley, ProQuest, and Embase) up to 18 April 2023. Studies were critically appraised using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 for randomized control trials (RCTs) and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale adapted by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) for cohort studies. Forest plots of pooled effect estimates and surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) were used for the analysis. Our analysis included 39 studies and a total of 7207 patients. Both bi-atrial ablation (BAA) and left atrial ablation (LAA) showed similar efficacy in restoring sinus rhythm (SR; BAA (77.9%) > LAA (76.2%) > pulmonary vein isolation (PVI; 66.5%); LAA: OR = 1.08 (CI 0.94-1.23); PVI: OR = 1.36 (CI 1.08-1.70)). However, BAA had higher pacemaker implantation (LAA: OR = 0.51 (CI 0.37-0.71); PVI: OR = 0.52 (CI 0.31-0.86)) and reoperation rates (LAA: OR = 0.71 (CI 0.28-1.45); PVI: OR = 0.31 (CI 0.1-0.64)). PVI had the lowest efficacy in restoring SR and a similar complication rate to LAA, but had the shortest procedure time (Cross-clamp (Xc): PVI (93.38) > LAA (37.36) > BAA (13.89)); Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB): PVI (93.93) > LAA (56.04) > BAA (0.03)). We suggest that LAA is the best surgical technique for AF ablation due to its comparable effectiveness in restoring SR, its lower rate of pacemaker requirement, and its lower reoperation rate compared to BAA. Furthermore, LAA ranks as the second-fastest procedure after PVI, with a similar CPB time.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA