RESUMEN
RATIONALE: The theory of self-efficacy states that specific efficacy expectations affect behaviour. Two types of efficacy expectations are described within the theory. Self-efficacy expectations are the beliefs in the capacity to perform a specific behaviour. Outcome expectations are the beliefs that carrying out a specific behaviour will lead to a desired outcome. OBJECTIVE: To develop and examine the reliability and validity of an outcome expectancy scale for self-care (OESS) among periodontal disease patients. METHODS: A 34-item scale was tested on 101 patients at a dental clinic. Accuracy was improved by item analysis, and internal consistency and test-retest stability were investigated. Concurrent validity was tested by examining associations of the OESS score with the self-efficacy scale for self-care (SESS) score and plaque index score. Construct validity was examined by comparing OESS scores between periodontal patients at initial visit (group 1) and those continuing maintenance care (group 2). RESULTS: Item analysis identified 13 items for the OESS. Factor analysis extracted three factors: social-, oral- and self-evaluative outcome expectancy. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the OESS was 0.90. A significant association was observed between test and retest scores, and between the OESS and SESS and plaque index scores. Further, group 2 had a significantly higher mean OESS score than group 1. CONCLUSION: We developed a 13-item OESS with high reliability and validity which may be used to assess outcome expectancy for self-care. A patient's psychological condition with regard to behaviour and affective status can be accurately evaluated using the OESS with SESS.
Asunto(s)
Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Enfermedades Periodontales/prevención & control , Enfermedades Periodontales/terapia , Autocuidado , Autoeficacia , Adulto , Anciano , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Estudios Transversales , Placa Dental/complicaciones , Placa Dental/diagnóstico , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Odontología Preventiva/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Autocuidado/psicologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study's purpose was to develop a task-specific self-efficacy scale for maternal oral care (SESMO) with reliability and validity. METHODS: A draft scale consisting of 36 items was designed and tested on 119 mothers at a dental clinic. Item analysis was performed to improve its accuracy by reducing the number of items. Internal consistency and test and retest stability were investigated. Concurrent validity was tested by examining associations of the SESMO score with the: general self-efficacy scale (GSES) score; number of decayed teeth; and frequency of tooth-brushing for children. Construct validity was examined by comparing the SESMO scores between mothers of children with caries at initial visit (Group 1) and those continuing regular dental checkups (Group 2). RESULTS: The item analysis selected 16 items for the SESMO. Alpha coefficient of the SESMO was 0.82. Significant correlation was observed between tests and retests (r=0.74). There were significant associations between the SESMO score and GSES score (r=0.39); number of decayed teeth (r=-0.33); and frequency of brushing children's teeth (r=0.66). Group 2 had a significantly higher SESMO score than Group 1 (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The SESMO showed high reliability and validity. This scale might endure with research applications in pediatric dental practice.
Asunto(s)
Relaciones Madre-Hijo , Madres/psicología , Higiene Bucal , Autoeficacia , Adulto , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Índice CPO , Atención Odontológica , Conducta Alimentaria , Femenino , Fluoruros Tópicos/uso terapéutico , Educación en Salud Dental , Humanos , Lactante , Persona de Mediana Edad , Salud Bucal , Cepillado DentalRESUMEN
AIM: To examine whether or not oral health care-specific self-efficacy can predict loss to follow-up for long-term periodontal treatment. METHODS: Our prospective cohort study enrolled 144 patients with chronic periodontitis. Patient self-efficacy was assessed on the initial visit using the self-efficacy scale for self-care (SESS). Participants were then followed for 30 months from the onset of periodontal treatment. The loss to follow-up is the main outcome variable. Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine the association between self-efficacy for self-care and loss to follow-up for periodontal treatment. Gender, age, number of teeth, probing depth, plaque control record (PCR) value, PCR improvement rate, general self-efficacy scale score, and SESS score were used as the independent variables, and loss to follow-up as a dependent variable. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients were lost to follow-up over the course of the study. Compared with the high-scoring SESS group (60-75), the odds ratio of loss to follow-up for the middle- (54-59) and low-scoring groups (15-53) were 1.05 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36-3.07] and 4.56 (95% CI: 1.11-18.74), respectively. CONCLUSION: Assessment of oral health care-specific self-efficacy may be useful in predicting loss to follow-up in long-term periodontal treatment.
Asunto(s)
Periodontitis Crónica/psicología , Higiene Bucal/psicología , Cooperación del Paciente/psicología , Pacientes Desistentes del Tratamiento/psicología , Autoeficacia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Periodontitis Crónica/terapia , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Estudios Prospectivos , Autocuidado/psicología , Autoevaluación (Psicología) , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Determine whether a six-step behavioral cognitive method is more effective than traditional oral hygiene instruction. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with chronic periodontitis were randomly assigned to two groups. The control group was given traditional oral hygiene instruction for 20 min. The intervention group received counseling by Farquhar's six-step method for 10 min after traditional oral hygiene instruction. In both groups, oral hygiene instruction was given once a week, and performed three times in total for 3 weeks. Clinical characteristics, deposition of dental plaque, frequency and duration of brushing, frequency of interdental cleaning and scores based on scale of "self-efficacy for brushing of the teeth" were compared in both groups. RESULTS: There were no differences between the two groups in clinical, demographic, behavioral and self-efficacy characteristics at the baseline examination. However after the third visit, the intervention group had a significantly higher self-efficacy, lower plaque index, longer brushing duration and higher frequency of inter-dental cleaning than those of the control group. Multiple regression analysis showed significant association of toothbrushing duration with self-efficacy for brushing of the teeth (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The six-step method might be more effective for enhancing self-efficacy and behavioral change of oral hygiene than traditional oral hygiene instruction alone. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Dentists and dental hygienists can use the six-step method for effective oral hygiene instruction.