RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We undertook a prospective randomized comparison of the LMA Fastrach™, Airtraq™ laryngoscope, and GlideScope™ used for face-to-face tracheal intubation simulated to mimic an entrapped patient. METHODS: Thirty senior emergency medicine physicians were trained in the use of the LMA Fastrach™, GlideScope™, and Airtraq™ laryngoscope with a standard airway trainer manikin (control). Participants were then asked to perform tracheal intubation in two difficult situations simulated on a difficult airway management manikin wearing a cervical collar. In Situation 1, the manikin was in the supine position with a difficult airway caused by stiffening the cervical spine. In Situation 2, the manikin was positioned to simulate face-to-face tracheal intubation. We measured intubation times, success rates for tracheal intubation, and the difficulty of tracheal intubation. Values are means (sd). RESULTS: In control and Situation 1, tracheal intubation details were similar. In Situation 2, face-to-face tracheal intubation success rate was increased with the Airtraq™ (100%), when compared with that of the GlideScope™ (70%, P<0.05) and LMA Fastrach™ (83%, P<0.05). Face-to-face tracheal intubation was less difficult (visual analogue scale: 0-100) with the Airtraq™ 11 (6) when compared with the GlideScope™ [33 (14) s, P<0.01)] and LMA Fastrach™ [22 (21) s, P<0.01]. The face-to-face tracheal intubation time was shorter with the Airtraq™ 14 (6) s than with the GlideScope™ [27 (18) s, P<0.01] and Fastrach™ [28 (10) s, P<0.01]. CONCLUSIONS: The Airtraq™ laryngoscope was superior to both the GlideScope™ and LMA Fastrach™ during simulated face-to-face difficult tracheal intubation.
Asunto(s)
Manejo de la Vía Aérea/métodos , Intubación Intratraqueal/métodos , Laringoscopios , Adulto , Anestesiología/educación , Competencia Clínica , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Intubación Intratraqueal/efectos adversos , Máscaras Laríngeas , Laringoscopía , Masculino , Maniquíes , Faringe/fisiología , Postura/fisiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Posición Supina/fisiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We have prospectively compared simulated-difficult tracheal intubation characteristics of four glottiscopes: Airtraq, GlideScope, McGrath, LMA CTrach with that of the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope. STUDY DESIGN: prospective with the airway devices proposed in a randomly assigned order. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Forty-two physicians, naïve to glottiscope handling accepted participating this study after the learning curve of each airway device was completed. Participants were requested to perform two series of five tracheal intubations on the manikin Airman, the first in standard situation and the second in difficult tracheal intubation simulation. The airway devices were chosen in a randomly assigned order. For each airway tool, the following tracheal intubation characteristics were recorded: laryngeal exposure quality, tracheal intubation and apnea durations. A performance index was calculated and a tracheal intubation difficulty was measured during simulation. RESULTS: More than 1600 supervised tracheal intubations were performed, including 1000 for the learning process of the glottiscopes, which was completed after 10 uses on the manikin. During standard situation, laryngeal exposure quality was similar with the five airway devices. As compared to the Macintosh laryngoscope, GlideScope, McGrath, tracheal intubation duration was shorter (p<0.05) with the Airtraq and longer (p<0.01) with the LMA CTrach. During difficult tracheal intubation simulation, laryngeal exposure and tracheal intubation duration was of better quality and shorter with the four glottiscopes as compared to that of LM, respectively. Performance index during difficult tracheal intubation simulation simulation was significantly more important (p<0.01) with the Airtraq and the LMA CTrach. Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscope were respectively the simplest (p<0.01) and the most difficult (p<0.01) airway devices to manage a simulated difficult tracheal intubation. CONCLUSION: When difficult airway was simulated on the manikin, the four glottiscopes were superior to the Macintosh laryngoscope to improve laryngeal exposure quality and to reduce duration of tracheal intubation. Airtraq and the LMA CTrach both demonstrated remarkable advantage over GlideScope and McGrath for simulated difficult intubation management.