RESUMEN
The detrimental effects of plastics on aquatic organisms, including those of macroplastics, microplastics, and nanoplastics, have been well established. However, knowledge on the interaction between plastics and terrestrial insects is limited. To develop effective strategies for mitigating the impact of plastic pollution on terrestrial ecosystems, it is necessary to understand the toxicity effects and influencing factors of plastic ingestion by insects. An overview of current knowledge regarding plastic ingestion by terrestrial insects is provided in this Review, and the factors influencing this interaction are identified. The pathways through which insects interact with plastics, which can lead to plastic accumulation and microplastic transfer to higher trophic levels, are also discussed using an overview and a conceptual model. The diverse impacts of plastic exposure on insects are discussed, and the challenges in existing studies, such as a limited focus on certain plastic types, are identified. Further research on standardized methods for sampling and analysis is crucial for reliable research, and long-term monitoring is essential to assess plastic trends and ecological impacts in terrestrial ecosystems. The mechanisms underlying these effects need to be uncovered, and their potential long-term consequences for insect populations and ecosystems require evaluation.
Asunto(s)
Insectos , Microplásticos , Animales , Microplásticos/toxicidad , Insectos/efectos de los fármacos , Plásticos/toxicidad , Ecosistema , Monitoreo del AmbienteRESUMEN
Studies of microplastics are increasing exponentially and standard protocols are only beginning to be established. Jellyfish are considered susceptible to ingesting microplastics because they feed on small, suspended particles. Inconsistent approaches used to study interactions between jellyfish and microplastics, however, make comparisons among studies difficult. Here we review aspects of the methods used to sample jellyfish in the field and experimental approaches used in the laboratory to study interactions between jellyfish and microplastics, recommend some standard protocols and identify areas for further research. We highlight the need for experiments to be environmentally relevant, to study a greater diversity of species and to study different life history stages.
Asunto(s)
Escifozoos , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua , Animales , Microplásticos , Plásticos , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/análisis , Monitoreo del AmbienteRESUMEN
Concepts in microplastics studies are not well established due to the emerging nature of microplastic research, especially in jellyfish. We conducted experiments to test whether ephyrae would ingest more microbeads via trophic transfer than direct ingestion and whether medusae would ingest more aged microbeads than virgin microbeads. We exposed ephyrae of Aurelia coerulea to two treatments, aged microbeads and Artemia nauplii that had ingested microbeads. We found that the ephyrae ingested 35 times more microbeads via trophic transfer than by direct ingestion. In the second experiment, medusae of A. coerulea were exposed to virgin microbeads and microbeads in seawater under a 12/12 light/dark cycle or constant darkness. Ingestion rates of microbeads from the light incubation were greater than those from the dark incubation or virgin microbeads, suggesting the likely presence of photosynthetic organisms in biofilms from the light incubation increased the palatability of the microbeads and promoted their ingestion.
Asunto(s)
Microplásticos , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua , Animales , Microesferas , Plásticos , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/análisisRESUMEN
Microplastics are ubiquitous pollutants in aquatic environments globally. Wastewater treatment plants are considered to be a major source of microplastics and jellyfish have been proposed as potential bioindicators of microplastic pollution. We tested whether treated wastewater influenced the concentration and/or composition of microplastics in the receiving water by comparing the concentration and composition of microplastics in seawater collected in the wastewater plume and at sites distant from treated wastewater releases in the Gold Coast Broadwater, Australia, and at sites within the nearby Tweed River estuaries, which receives >10 times less wastewater discharge. In addition, tiger sea nettle Chrysaora cf. pentostoma medusae were collected to determine whether more microplastics occurred in the guts of the medusae nearby diffusers and whether the microplastics ingested by medusae were representative of those present in the water column. The concentration and composition of microplastics at the wastewater release sites did not significantly differ from sites that were distant from them. Eighty three percent of medusae contained microplastics in their guts and the composition of the ingested microplastics differed significantly from that in the surrounding water. We concluded that discharged treated wastewater had no detectable effect on levels or composition of microplastics in the receiving water and that C. pentostoma are unsuitable bioindicators because the microplastics they ingested did not represent those available in their environment.
Asunto(s)
Microplásticos , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua , Biomarcadores Ambientales , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Plásticos , Aguas Residuales/análisis , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/análisisRESUMEN
Jellyfish are voracious planktonic predators that may be susceptible to ingesting microplastics. We measured rates of ingestion and egestion of microbeads by Aurelia aurita (Scyphozoa) and evaluated whether ingesting microbeads affected metabolism or gut epithelia. Ingestion rates were measured by exposing medusae to microbeads and randomly sampling them 6 times over a 32 h period to determine the number of microbeads in their tissues. Egestion rates were measured by exposing medusae to microbeads for 1 h before transferring them to kreisels without microbeads and sampling them 6 times over 8 h. Respiration rates of medusae were determined using incubations and potential damage to gut epithelia was evaluated using histopathology. Medusae ingested few microbeads and egested them within 8 h. Microbeads had no effect on respiration and the histology. We concluded that the medusae may recognise microbeads as non-food particles and that their ingestion caused undetectable physiological and histological harm.