RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In patients with Scheuermann kyphosis (SK) undergoing posterior spinal fusion with instrumentation (PSFI), intraoperative lateral radiographs assess deformity correction in the prone position. The relationship between thoracic and (partially un-instrumented) lumbar parameters on prone intraoperative versus standing postoperative radiographs is unknown. METHODS: Forty-five consecutive patients with SK who underwent PSFI between 2007 and 2014 were reviewed. Thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), instrumented level kyphosis [upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV)-lower instrumented vertebrae (LIV)], and traditional sagittal parameters were recorded from preoperative standing, intraoperative prone, first outpatient standing, and >2-year standing radiographs and time periods were compared. Exclusion criteria included reduction modification after intraoperative radiographs and postoperative construct revision prohibiting comparison to initial intraoperative radiographs. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients averaging 16 (12 to 20) years old during surgery with 3.1 (2 to 7) years follow-up met inclusion criteria. Average surgical variables included: 13±1 fusion levels, UIV at T2, LIV at L3, 3.8±1.6 osteotomies per patient, and 43±9% correction of TK. Preoperative TK and LL measured 82 and 76 degrees, respectively. TK on intraoperative (47 degrees), 6-week (49 degrees), and >2-year (50 degrees) radiographs changed significantly only between intraoperative and >2-year radiographs (P=0.03) by just 3 degrees. LL increased 5 degrees from intraoperative prone to 6-week standing radiographs (51 to 56 degrees, P=0.01) without further significant change at >2 years (59 degrees, P=0.09). Instrumented levels (UIV-LIV) had increased kyphosis at 6 weeks (32 to 35 degrees, P=0.01) without further change at >2 years (36 degrees, P=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: TK on intraoperative prone radiographs during PSFI for SK should match the standing TK â¼6 weeks later. Intraoperative prone LL only slightly increases on early standing radiographs. Assuming a routine postoperative course, intraoperative radiographs slightly underestimate TK (by 3 degrees) and LL (by 8 degrees) on >2-year standing radiographs. These parameters (TK, LL, UIV-LIV) are visualized during surgery and should be used in future studies to predict long-term outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-retrospective study.
Asunto(s)
Cifosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Lordosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de Scheuermann/cirugía , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios , Cifosis/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Masculino , Osteotomía , Posicionamiento del Paciente , Periodo Posoperatorio , Posición Prona , Radiografía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Escoliosis/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter cohort analysis. OBJECTIVE: Assess children and guardian's comprehension of surgical consent for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery and factors associated with their comprehension. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Informed consent is essential to the ethical practice of surgery. Little is known about how informed are children and guardians when consenting to operation for AIS. METHODS: Guardians and their children (10-18 yr) undergoing spinal fusion for AIS were prospectively evaluated at 4 institutions. Each child and guardian was asked to complete a questionnaire of the risks, benefits and expected results of operative treatment and a self-assessment of overall comprehension. A site-survey questionnaire regarding teaching methods, timing between teaching and consent, and healthcare provider involved in the consent process was also used. Significance was assessed using logistic regression examining factors associated with good (≥6 scores correct) and poor (<6 scores correct) comprehension. RESULTS: One hundred seventy six pairs of patient/guardian were enrolled. Fifty-seven patient/guardian questionnaires were discarded due to incompleteness. A greater percentage of guardians had good overall comprehension of the surgical consent (patients: 59.7%; guardian: 71.4%). Post-operative mobility (patient 31%; guardian 42%) was poorly understood. Surgical risks (i.e., neurologic injury, infection, hardware failure, future sequelae) were modestly understood (40-70% correct). Factors associated with better understanding were older patient age (>12 yr), guardian with a college degree, obtaining consent by the attending surgeon and at a separate preoperative visit than the time of teaching, the use of visual aids, and participation in a "peer-support group" preoperatively. There was a trend toward guardians' and patients' self-assessment of understanding mirroring their respective objective performances. DISCUSSION: Patients who undergo surgical intervention for AIS and their guardians understand approximately 60% of the surgical consent. The use of preoperative multimodal teaching techniques and "peer-support groups" may improve patient and guardian comprehension.