RESUMEN
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 is an ongoing pandemic that causes significant health/socioeconomic burden. Variants of concern (VOCs) have emerged which may affect transmissibility, disease severity and re-infection risk. Most studies focus on the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the Spike protein. However, some studies suggest that the Spike N-terminal domain (NTD) may have a role in facilitating virus entry via sialic-acid receptor binding. Furthermore, most VOCs include novel NTD variants. Recent analyses demonstrated that NTD insertions in VOCs tend to lie close to loop regions likely to be involved in binding sialic acids. We extended the structural characterisation of these putative sugar binding pockets and explored whether variants could enhance the binding to sialic acids and therefore to the host membrane, thereby contributing to increased transmissibility. We found that recent NTD insertions in VOCs (i.e., Gamma, Delta and Omicron variants) and emerging variants of interest (VOIs) (i.e., Iota, Lambda, Theta variants) frequently lie close to known and putative sugar-binding pockets. For some variants, including the recent Omicron VOC, we find increases in predicted sialic acid binding energy, compared to the original SARS-CoV-2, which may contribute to increased transmission. We examined the similarity of NTD across a range of related Betacoronaviruses to determine whether the putative sugar-binding pockets are sufficiently similar to be exploited in drug design. Despite global sequence and structure similarity, most sialic-acid binding pockets of NTD vary across related coronaviruses. Typically, SARS-CoV-2 possesses additional loops in these pockets that increase contact with polysaccharides. Our work suggests ongoing evolutionary tuning of the sugar-binding pockets in the virus. Whilst three of the pockets are too structurally variable to be amenable to pan Betacoronavirus drug design, we detected a fourth pocket that is highly structurally conserved and could therefore be investigated in pursuit of a generic drug. Our structure-based analyses help rationalise the effects of VOCs and provide hypotheses for experiments. For example, the Omicron variant, which has increased binding to sialic acids in pocket 3, has a rather unique insertion near pocket 3. Our work suggests a strong need for experimental monitoring of VOC changes in NTD.
RESUMEN
SARS-CoV-2, the agent of the COVID-19 pandemic, can infect a wide range of mammals. Since its spread in humans, secondary host jumps of SARS-CoV-2 from humans to a variety of domestic and wild populations of mammals have been documented. The evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in different host species is of fundamental interest while also providing indication of how SARS-CoV-2 may have adapted to human hosts soon after the initial host jump, a time window for which there are no genome sequences available. Moreover, the study of SARS-CoV-2 circulating in animals is critical to assess the risk that the transmission of animal-adapted viral lineages back into humans (i.e., spillback) may pose. Here, we compared the genomic landscapes of SARS-CoV-2 isolated from animal species relative to that in humans, profiling the mutational biases indicative of potentially different selective pressures in animals. We focused on viral genomes collected in infected mink (Neovison vison) and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) for which reports of multiple independent spillover events and subsequent animal-to-animal transmission are available. We identified six candidate mutations for animal-specific adaptation in mink (NSP9_G37E, Spike_F486L, Spike_N501T, Spike_Y453F, ORF3a_T229I, ORF3a_L219V), and one in deer (NSP3a_L1035F), though these mutations appear to confer minimal advantage for circulation in humans. Additionally, circulation of SARS-CoV-2 in mink and deer has not caused considerable changes to the evolutionary trajectory of SARS-CoV-2 thus far. Finally, our results suggest that minimal adaptation was required for human-to-animal spillover and subsequent onward transmission in mink and deer, highlighting the generalist nature of SARS-CoV-2 as a pathogen of mammalian hosts.
RESUMEN
SARS-CoV-2 has a zoonotic origin and was transmitted to humans via an undetermined intermediate host, leading to infections in humans and other mammals. To enter host cells, the viral spike protein (S-protein) binds to its receptor, ACE2, and is then processed by TMPRSS2. Whilst receptor binding contributes to the viral host range, S-protein:ACE2 complexes from other animals have not been investigated widely. To predict infection risks, we modelled S-protein:ACE2 complexes from 215 vertebrate species, calculated changes in the energy of the complex caused by mutations in each species, relative to human ACE2, and correlated these changes with COVID-19 infection data. We also analysed structural interactions to better understand the key residues contributing to affinity. We predict that mutations are more detrimental in ACE2 than TMPRSS2. Finally, we demonstrate phylogenetically that human SARS-CoV-2 strains have been isolated in animals. Our results suggest that SARS-CoV-2 can infect a broad range of mammals, but few fish, birds or reptiles. Susceptible animals could serve as reservoirs of the virus, necessitating careful ongoing animal management and surveillance.