RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Patellofemoral pain, maltracking and instability remain common and challenging complications after total knee arthroplasty. Controversy exists regarding the effect of kinematic alignment on the patellofemoral joint, as it generally leads to more femoral component valgus and internal rotation compared to mechanical alignment. The aim of this systematic review is to thoroughly examine the influence of kinematic alignment on the third space. METHODS: A systematic search of the Pubmed, Cochrane and Web of Science databases was performed to screen for relevant articles published before 7 April 2024. This led to the final inclusion of 42 articles: 2 cadaveric, 9 radiographic, 12 computer simulation and 19 clinical studies. The risk of bias was evaluated with the risk of bias in non-randomised studies - of interventions tool as the lowest level of evidence of the included clinical studies was IV. The effects of kinematic alignment on patellar kinematics and kinetics, trochlear anatomy reconstruction and patellofemoral complication rate were investigated. RESULTS: Kinematic alignment closely restores native patellar kinematics and kinetics, better reproduces native trochlear anatomy than mechanical alignment and leads to a 0%-11.4% incidence of patellofemoral complications. A more valgus joint line of the distal femur can cause lateral trochlear undercoverage and a trochlear angle orientation medial to the quadriceps vector when applying kinematic alignment, both of which can be solved by using an adjusted design with a 20.5° valgus trochlea. CONCLUSION: Kinematic alignment appears to be a safe strategy for the patellofemoral joint in most knees, provided that certain precautions are taken to minimize the risk of complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV clinical studies, in vitro research.

RESUMEN

We introduce our technique for posterolateral corner reconstruction, which is based on the principle described in Arciero's technique for anatomic reconstruction of lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and popliteofibular ligament (PFL) to gain static stability in varus strain and external rotation. This technique uses a doubled gracilis autograft to reconstruct the PFL and a split biceps tendon transfer to reconstruct the LCL. Using this technique an anatomical LCL and PFL reconstruction can be performed in combination with anterior cruciate ligament or posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction without contralateral graft harvest or allograft. The technique also enables an isolated reconstruction of LCL or PFL when required and can be performed to augment an acute repair.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND (INCLUDING THE AIM OF THE STUDY): Young and more active patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA) in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency are difficult to treat. The aim of this study was to explore the outcomes of combined fixed bearing Physica ZUK medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) (Lima Corporate, Udine Italy) with ACL reconstruction for patients presenting with isolated medial compartment OA and symptomatic ACL deficiency. METHODS: Patients who underwent simultaneous single stage ACL reconstruction and medial UKR between 2012 and 2020 by a single surgeon (GG) were included. Preoperative outcome measures including Lysholm, Tegner, Oxford Knee Score and VAS pain score were evaluated and were repeated postoperatively at the most recent follow up appointment. RESULTS: Twenty four patients underwent simultaneous combined ACL and ZUK Medial UKR with a mean follow up of 5.1 years. Significant improvements in Lysholm (p < 0.001), Tegner (p < 0.001), Oxford Knee Score (p < 0.001) and VAS pain scores (p < 0.001) were seen with this combined approach with all patients returning to sport. Two patients had a minor peri-operative complication, which was treated conservatively. There were no revision procedures, and no evidence of implant loosening, however one patient had deceased due to an unrelated illness. CONCLUSION: UKR combined with ACL reconstruction can be an effective treatment option for selected patients suffering from medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis and symptomatic ACL deficiency. This allowed active patients to return to sports, addressing both instability and OA pain in a specific patient population.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pediatric Monteggia fractures are relatively rare and are commonly missed. Radial head subluxation can persist with long-term consequences if these fractures are left untreated. We evaluated the long-term treatment outcomes after open reduction with ulnar osteotomy for missed Monteggia fractures during childhood. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen children were included. Our objective was to assess the clinical and radiographic postoperative outcomes. We evaluated satisfaction by questionnaire. Open reduction of the radial head was performed, combined with an opening-wedge ulnar osteotomy. The mean interval between trauma and surgery was 26.9 months (range, 1-145 months). The mean length of follow-up was 132 months (range, 67-206 months). RESULTS: Only patients with a delay of more than 6 months complained of elbow tenderness. Clinical improvement (except for pronation) was obtained postoperatively, with significance found in the flexion-extension arc (P = .011). In addition, pronation loss (P = .044) and the flexion-extension arc (P = .041) improved significantly in patients with a surgical delay under 6 months compared with patients with a surgical delay of more than 6 months. Radiographically, there were 9 good and 5 fair results. We found a negative association between radiographic outcomes and both age at surgery and delay to surgery (P = .036 and P = .039, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Good results can be obtained after open reduction with opening-wedge ulnar osteotomy. Lesser clinical and radiographic outcomes can be expected after a surgical delay of more than 6 months. Furthermore, the radiographic outcome seems better if the patient is younger than 6 years.

Asunto(s)