RESUMEN
No-reference image quality assessment (NR-IQA) methods automatically and objectively predict the perceptual quality of images without access to a reference image. Therefore, due to the lack of pristine images in most medical image acquisition systems, they play a major role in supporting the examination of resulting images and may affect subsequent treatment. Their usage is particularly important in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characterized by long acquisition times and a variety of factors that influence the quality of images. In this work, a survey covering recently introduced NR-IQA methods for the assessment of MR images is presented. First, typical distortions are reviewed and then popular NR methods are characterized, taking into account the way in which they describe MR images and create quality models for prediction. The survey also includes protocols used to evaluate the methods and popular benchmark databases. Finally, emerging challenges are outlined along with an indication of the trends towards creating accurate image prediction models.
RESUMEN
The quality of magnetic resonance images may influence the diagnosis and subsequent treatment. Therefore, in this paper, a novel no-reference (NR) magnetic resonance image quality assessment (MRIQA) method is proposed. In the approach, deep convolutional neural network architectures are fused and jointly trained to better capture the characteristics of MR images. Then, to improve the quality prediction performance, the support vector machine regression (SVR) technique is employed on the features generated by fused networks. In the paper, several promising network architectures are introduced, investigated, and experimentally compared with state-of-the-art NR-IQA methods on two representative MRIQA benchmark datasets. One of the datasets is introduced in this work. As the experimental validation reveals, the proposed fusion of networks outperforms related approaches in terms of correlation with subjective opinions of a large number of experienced radiologists.