Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 61(1): 51-7, 2000 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10695647

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few data are available to guide treatment selection in major depression. With increasing pressure to maximize the efficiency and minimize the costs of treatment, it is important to have information that could guide treatment selection or point to treatment strategies that have a high probability of success. METHOD: We used a successive cohort approach to compare 2 highly similar groups of women with recurrent unipolar disorder (DSM-III-R or DSM-IV): one in which the combination of interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) and pharmacotherapy was initiated at the outset of treatment and a second in which IPT alone was provided first and only those who did not remit with IPT alone were offered the combination treatment. RESULTS: In the group in which the combination was initiated at the outset of treatment (N = 180), the remission rate was 66%, comparable to the remission rate observed in most outpatient treatment studies of major depression. In contrast, among the women in the second cohort who were first treated with IPT alone and only those who did not remit were given combination therapy (N = 159), the remission rate was 79%, significantly greater than that observed in the group that received combination treatment from the outset (chi2 = 6.55, p = .02). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the strategy of offering IPT to women with recurrent unipolar disorder and, in the absence of remission, adding antidepressant pharmacotherapy can be a highly effective treatment, one that may be particularly attractive to women in the childbearing years. Although slower in its onset of action, this sequential strategy is likely to enable the clear majority of such women to achieve a full remission of depressive symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Imipramina/uso terapéutico , Psicoterapia/métodos , Adulto , Edad de Inicio , Anciano , Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/administración & dosificación , Protocolos Clínicos , Estudios de Cohortes , Terapia Combinada , Trastorno Depresivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Imipramina/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Recurrencia , Factores Sexuales , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Am J Psychiatry ; 154(10): 1412-6, 1997 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9326824

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Primary insomnia and insomnia related to mental disorders are the two most common DSM-IV insomnia diagnoses, but distinguishing between them is difficult in clinical practice. This analysis was performed to identify clinical factors used by sleep specialists to distinguish primary insomnia from insomnia related to mental disorders. METHOD: Clinicians evaluated 216 patients referred for insomnia at five clinical sites, rated a list of clinical factors judged to contribute to each patient's presentation, and assigned diagnoses. Analysis of variance was performed, with contributing factors as the dependent variable and diagnostic group and clinic location as independent variables. RESULTS: Sleep specialists rated a psychiatric disorder as a stronger factor for insomnia related to mental disorders and rated negative conditioning and sleep hygiene as stronger factors for primary insomnia. However, a psychiatric disorder was rated as a contributing factor for 77% of patients who received a first diagnosis of primary insomnia. CONCLUSIONS: While neither sleep hygiene nor negative conditioning is a diagnostic criterion in DSM-IV, these results support the face validity of these clinical factors distinguishing between primary insomnia and insomnia related to mental disorders. The use of a psychiatric disorder as an inclusion criterion for insomnia related to mental disorders and an exclusion criterion for primary insomnia reinforces a categorical distinction between the two diagnoses, but the contribution of psychiatric symptoms in primary insomnia appears to be a clinically relevant one. These findings suggest the need for studies on the validity of negative conditioning and sleep hygiene in the etiology of primary insomnia, as well as on the significance of psychiatric disorders, especially depression, in primary insomnia.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Comorbilidad , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Análisis Factorial , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sueño/fisiología , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/epidemiología , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/psicología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA