Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care ; 12(4)2024 Jul 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39025795

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN), a common complication of diabetes, can manifest as small, large, or mixed fiber neuropathy (SFN, LFN, and MFN, respectively), depending on the type of fibers involved. Despite evidence indicating small fiber involvement prior to large fiber involvement in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM)-associated DPN, no evidence has been produced to determine the more prevalent subtype. We aim to determine the more prevalent type of nerve fiber damage-SFN, LFN, and MFN-in T1DM-associated DPN, both with and without pain. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, participants (n=216) were divided into controls; T1DM; T1DM with non-painful DPN (NP-DPN); and T1DM with painful DPN (P-DPN). DPN was further subgrouped based on neuropathy severity. The more prevalent type of fiber damage was determined applying small and large fiber-specific tests and three diagnostic models: model 1 (≥1 abnormal test); model 2 (≥2 abnormal tests); and model 3 (≥3 abnormal tests). RESULTS: MFN showed the highest prevalence in T1DM-associated DPN. No differences in neuropathy subtype were found between NP-DPN and P-DPN. DPN, with prevalent SFN plateaus between models 2 and 3. All models showed increased prevalence of MFN according to DPN severity. Model 3 showed increased DPN with prevalent LFN in early neuropathy. DPN with prevalent SFN demonstrated a similar, but non-significant pattern. CONCLUSIONS: DPN primarily manifests as MFN in T1DM, with no differentiation between NP-DPN and P-DPN. Additionally, we propose model 2 as an initial criterion for diagnosing DPN with a more prevalent SFN subtype in T1DM. Lastly, the study suggests that in mild stages of DPN, one type of nerve fiber (either small or large) is more susceptible to damage.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Neuropatías Diabéticas , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Neuropatías Diabéticas/epidemiología , Neuropatías Diabéticas/patología , Neuropatías Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Neuropatías Diabéticas/etiología , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fibras Nerviosas/patología , Prevalencia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Seguimiento , Conducción Nerviosa/fisiología , Pronóstico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
2.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 206 Suppl 1: 110753, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38245319

RESUMEN

Diabetic neuropathy is a common complication of diabetes that affects up to 50% of patients during the course of the disease; 20-30% of the patients also develop neuropathic pain. The mechanisms underlying neuropathy are not known in detail, but both metabolic and vascular factors may contribute to the development of neuropathy. The development of the most common type of neuropathy is insidious, often starting distally in the toes and feet and gradually ascending up the leg and later also involving fingers and hands. The symptoms are mainly sensory with either sensory loss or positive symptoms with different types of paresthesia or painful sensations. In more advanced cases motor dysfunction may occur, causing gait disturbances and falls. The diagnosis of neuropathy is based on history and a careful examination, which includes a sensory examination of both large and small sensory nerve fiber function, as well as an examination of motor function and deep tendon reflexes of the lower limbs. Attention needs to be paid to the feet including examination of the skin, joints, and vascular supply. Nerve conduction studies are rarely needed to make a diagnosis of neuropathy. In patients with clear motor deficit or with an asymmetrical presentation, additional electrophysiological examination may be necessary. Early detection of diabetic neuropathy is important to avoid further irreversible injury to the peripheral nerves.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Neuropatías Diabéticas , Neuralgia , Humanos , Neuropatías Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Neuropatías Diabéticas/etiología , Neuropatías Diabéticas/patología , Conducción Nerviosa/fisiología , Nervios Periféricos , Neuralgia/diagnóstico , Neuralgia/etiología , Mano/patología
3.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 47(3): 681-9, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26401703

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Autonomic function has received little attention in Alzheimer's disease (AD). AD pathology has an impact on brain regions which are important for central autonomic control, but it is unclear if AD is associated with disturbance of autonomic function. OBJECTIVE: To investigate autonomic function using standardized techniques in patients with AD and healthy age-matched controls. METHOD: Thirty-three patients with mild to moderate AD and 30 age- and gender-matched healthy controls, without symptoms of autonomic dysfunction, underwent standardized autonomic testing with deep breathing, Valsalva maneuver, head-up tilt, and isometric handgrip test. Brachial pressure curve and electrocardiogram were recorded for off-line analysis of blood pressure and beat-to-beat heart rate (HR). RESULTS: AD patients had impaired blood pressure responses to Vasalva maneuver (p < 0.0001) and HR response to isometric contraction (p = 0.0001). A modified composite autonomic scoring scale showed greater degree of autonomic impairment in patients compared to controls (patient: 2.1 ±â€Š1.6; controls: 0.9 ±â€Š1.1, p = 0.001). HR response to deep breathing and Valsalva ratio were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: We identified autonomic impairment ranging from mild to severe in patients with mild to moderate AD, who did not report autonomic symptoms. Autonomic impairment was mainly related to impairment of sympathetic function and evident by impaired blood pressure response to the Vasalva maneuver. The clinical implications of this finding are that AD may be associated with autonomic disturbances, but patients with AD may rarely report symptoms of autonomic dysfunction. Future research should systematically evaluate symptoms of autonomic function and characterize risk factors associated with autonomic dysfunction.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer/fisiopatología , Sistema Nervioso Autónomo/fisiopatología , Anciano , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Arteria Braquial/fisiopatología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Fuerza de la Mano/fisiología , Corazón/fisiopatología , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Humanos , Contracción Isométrica/fisiología , Masculino , Escala del Estado Mental , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Maniobra de Valsalva/fisiología
4.
Handb Clin Neurol ; 115: 279-90, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23931787

RESUMEN

Neuropathic pain is the most common type of pain in neuropathy. In painful polyneuropathies the pain usually has a "glove and stocking" distribution. The pain may be predominantly spontaneous, e.g., with a burning, pricking, or shooting character or characterized by evoked pain such as mechanical or cold allodynia. In the clinical setting, the prevention of painful neuropathies and treatment of underlying neuropathy remains inadequate and thus symptomatic treatment of the pain and related disability needs to be offered. Most randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) published in painful neuropathy have been conducted in patients with diabetes and to what extent a treatment which is found effective in painful diabetic polyneuropathy can be expected to relieve other conditions like chemotherapy- or HIV-induced neuropathy is unknown. Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), gabapentin, pregabalin, and serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are first drug choices. In patients with localized neuropathic pain, a topical lidocaine patch may also be considered. Second-line treatments are tramadol and other opioids. New types of treatment include botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A), high-dose capsaicin patches, and cannabinoids. Other types of anticonvulsant drugs such as lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, and lacosamide have a more questionable efficacy in painful polyneuropathy but may have an effect in a subgroup of patients. Combination therapy may be considered in patients with insufficient effect from one drug. Treatment is usually a trial-and-error process and has to be individualized to the single patient, taking into account all comorbidities such as possible concomitant depression, anxiety, diseases, and drug interactions. Side-effects to antidepressants include dry mouth, nausea, constipation, orthostatic hypotension, and sedation. ECG should always be obtained prior to treatment with TCAs, which also should not be used in patients with cardiac incompensation and epilepsy. The most common side-effects of gabapentin and pregabalin are CNS-related side-effects with dizziness and somnolence. Peripheral edema, weight gain, nausea, vertigo, asthenia, dry mouth, and ataxia may also occur. Topical treatments are better tolerated due to lack of systemic side-effects but there is still limited evidence for the long-term efficacy of these drugs. With available drugs, the average pain reduction is about 20-30%, and only 20-35% of the patients will achieve at least 50% pain reduction, which stresses the need of a multidisciplinary approach to pain treatment.


Asunto(s)
Manejo del Dolor , Dolor/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/terapia , Humanos
5.
Pain ; 145(1-2): 237-45, 2009 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19665302

RESUMEN

Fabry disease is an X-linked inherited lysosomal disorder with dysfunction of the lysosomal enzyme alpha-galactosidase A causing accumulation of glycolipids in multiple organs including the nervous system. Pain and somatosensory disturbances are prominent manifestations of this disease. Until recently disease manifestations in female carriers of Fabry disease have been questioned. To explore the frequency of symptoms and the functional and structural involvement of the nervous system in female patients we examined the presence of pain, manifestations of peripheral neuropathy and nerve density in skin biopsies in 19 female patients with Fabry disease and 19 sex- and age-matched controls. Diaries, quantitative sensory testing, neurophysiologic tests and skin biopsies were performed. Daily pain was present in 63% of patients, with a median VAS score of 4.0. Tactile detection threshold and pressure pain threshold were lower and cold detection thresholds increased in patients. Sensory nerve action potential amplitude and maximal sensory conduction velocity were not different, whereas there was a highly significant reduction in intraepidermal nerve fiber density. We found no correlation between pain VAS score, quantitative sensory testing and intraepidermal nerve fiber density. Our study demonstrates that careful evaluation of symptoms in female Fabry patients is important as small fiber disease manifestations are present, which in some cases is only detected by skin biopsy.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Fabry/patología , Fibras Nerviosas/efectos de los fármacos , Fibras Nerviosas/fisiología , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , alfa-Galactosidasa/uso terapéutico , Potenciales de Acción/efectos de los fármacos , Potenciales de Acción/fisiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Enfermedad de Fabry/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Fabry/genética , Enfermedad de Fabry/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Conducción Nerviosa/efectos de los fármacos , Conducción Nerviosa/fisiología , Examen Neurológico/métodos , Dolor/etiología , Dolor/psicología , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Estimulación Física , Calidad de Vida , Umbral Sensorial , Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Piel/inervación , Estadística como Asunto , Sensación Térmica/efectos de los fármacos , Sensación Térmica/fisiología , Adulto Joven
7.
Nat Rev Neurosci ; 7(11): 873-81, 2006 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17053811

RESUMEN

Phantom pain refers to pain in a body part that has been amputated or deafferented. It has often been viewed as a type of mental disorder or has been assumed to stem from pathological alterations in the region of the amputation stump. In the past decade, evidence has accumulated that phantom pain might be a phenomenon of the CNS that is related to plastic changes at several levels of the neuraxis and especially the cortex. Here, we discuss the evidence for putative pathophysiological mechanisms with an emphasis on central, and in particular cortical, changes. We cite both animal and human studies and derive suggestions for innovative interventions aimed at alleviating phantom pain.


Asunto(s)
Adaptación Fisiológica , Sistema Nervioso Central/fisiopatología , Plasticidad Neuronal , Dolor Intratable/fisiopatología , Miembro Fantasma/fisiopatología , Animales , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/tendencias , Humanos , Dolor Intratable/terapia , Miembro Fantasma/terapia , Células Receptoras Sensoriales/fisiopatología , Corteza Somatosensorial/fisiopatología , Médula Espinal/fisiopatología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA