RESUMEN
CONTEXT: Immediate athletic trainer (AT) availability for acute injuries is essential as worse long-term outcomes are associated with delays in receiving medical care. Several factors have been found to influence AT availability between secondary schools, but few studies have evaluated how medical coverage varies between athlete groups. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this project was to identify factors that impact the time to AT evaluation following acute sport-related injury in secondary school setting. DESIGN: Cross-Sectional Study. SETTING: Retrospective analysis of de-identified patient records via the Athletic Training Practice-Based Research Network. PATIENTS: High school athletes diagnosed with an acute sport related injury during in-season play from 2010-2023. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Time to AT evaluation was measured as the number of days between injury onset, reported by the patient, to AT evaluation. RESULTS: This report consists of 17,354 patient cases representing 20 different sports. Overall, 46.9% (n=8,138) of patients who sustained an injury during in-season play were evaluated by an AT the same day (range=0-14days). Significant group differences were reported for sex (p <. 001), setting (p <. 001), and sport level (p < .01), with females and in-game injuries associated with longer times to AT evaluation. Freshmen were evaluated sooner than JV (p < .01) and varsity (p < .001) athletes. No difference was observed between JV and varsity athletes (p=0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of patients received medical care within 24 hours following an acute injury during in-season play, highlighting how qualified health care is accessible for many student athletes through ATs in the secondary school setting. Differences in time to AT evaluation may be attributable to sex discrepancies in immediate medical coverage between sports and injury reporting patterns among athletes.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Youth sport specialization is a growing trend in youth sports and is associated with an increased risk of injuries and burnout. However, it is unknown how sport specialization is perceived to be affecting the working environment of secondary school athletic trainers (ATs). The purpose of this paper is to describe how ATs perceive youth sport specialization impacting their workload and whether they perceive it to impact patient safety. HYPOTHESIS: ATs will perceive that youth sport specialization impacts their workload and could impact patient safety. STUDY DESIGN: A sequential, explanatory mixed methods design with 2 phases: (1) cross-sectional surveys and (2) individual interviews. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. METHODS: A total of 487 secondary school ATs completed the online survey (access rate, 8.4%; completion rate, 85.4%). The survey consisted of Likert questions and included sections about aspects of workload impacted by specialization, impacts on patient safety, demographics. Ten participants were selected to complete a semi-structured interview via video conference. RESULTS: Approximately two-thirds of ATs perceive that sport specialization impacts their workload. (Somewhat, 38.6%; Quite a bit, 25.5%; A great deal, 5.5%) Attempts to reduce or modify patient activity and a patient's time for rehabilitation were the highest rated aspects of workload impacted by sport specialization. Approximately 30% ATs (29.9%) perceive that sport specialization impacts their workload to where it may influence patient safety (Somewhat, 21.6%; Quite a bit, 6.4%; A great deal, 1.9%). Three themes and subsequent subthemes were identified from the qualitative interviews: (1) current youth sport expectations, (2) conflict between school and club sports, and (3) AT job impacts. CONCLUSION: Secondary school ATs perceive their workload to be negatively impacted by youth sport specialization and some believe it may impact patient safety. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Youth sport specialization is impacting youth sport stakeholders, including ATs, in a variety of ways.