RESUMEN
Percutaneous tracheostomy is a safe and effective bedside procedure. Some advocate the use of bronchoscopy during the procedure to reduce the rate of complications. We evaluated our complication rate in trauma patients undergoing percutaneous tracheostomy with and without bronchoscopic guidance to ascertain if there was a difference in the rate of complications. A retrospective review of all tracheostomies performed in critically ill trauma patients was performed using the trauma registry from an urban, Level I Trauma Center. Bronchoscopy assistance was used based on surgeon preference. Standard statistical methodology was used to determine if there was a difference in complication rates for procedures performed with and without the bronchoscope. From January 2007, to April 2016, 649 patients underwent modified percuteaneous tracheostomy; 289 with the aid of a bronchoscope and 360 without. There were no statistically significant differences in any type of complication regardless of utilization of a bronchoscope. The addition of bronchoscopy provides several theoretical benefits when performing percutaneous tracheostomy. Our findings, however, do not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in complications between procedures performed with and without a bronchoscope. Use of the bronchoscope should, therefore, be left to the discretion of the performing physician.
Asunto(s)
Broncoscopía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Traqueostomía/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Fístula del Sistema Respiratorio/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Tráquea/diagnóstico , Traqueostomía/efectos adversos , Fístula Vascular/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Fístula del Sistema Respiratorio/etiología , Enfermedades de la Tráquea/etiología , Fístula Vascular/etiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The precise role of repeat abdominal computed tomography (CT) imaging in the diagnosis and management of bowel injury is unclear. We reviewed 540 patients with blunt abdominal trauma managed at a Level II trauma center over a 5-year period to better define the role of repeat imaging. One hundred patients had a repeat abdominal CT scan within 72 hours of admission. These patients were young with multisystem injuries (mean ± standard deviation age, 34 ± 15 years; Injury Severity Score, 21 ± 12; Glasgow Coma Score [GCS], 12 ± 5). There were 14 patients with bowel injuries. All bowel-injured patients survived without abdominal morbidity. Time to repeat CT was shortest in the bowel injured group (20 ± 10 hours). The repeat CT was most helpful in patients with significant closed head injury (mean GCS, 3 ± 1) and in those with occult bowel injury. The repeat scan resulted in a change in clinical management in 26 patients. Regarding the presence of bowel perforation, the follow-up scan enhanced sensitivity from 30 to 82 per cent. The repeat abdominal CT is best used selectively in patients with blunt abdominal trauma and can provide clinically useful information to exclude bowel injury.