Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 65
Filtrar
2.
Data Brief ; 9: 199-205, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27656673

RESUMEN

This article contains data on clinical endpoints (Peak Flow Expiratory Rate, fractional exhaled nitric oxide and total IgE serum levels) and plasma pharmacokinetic parameters concerning the use of the oral CRTh2 antagonist QAW039 (fevipiprant) in mild to moderate asthma patients. Information on experimental design and methods on how this data was obtained is also described. Further interpretation and discussion of this data can be found in the article "The oral CRTh2 antagonist QAW039 (fevipiprant): a phase II study in uncontrolled allergic asthma" (Erpenbeck et al., in press) [1].

3.
Clin Transl Allergy ; 6: 32, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27540466

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic idiopathic/spontaneous urticaria (CIU/CSU) report difficulty with sleep. METHODS: We examined the effect of omalizumab on sleep-related outcomes during 3-6 months omalizumab or placebo treatment and a 16-week follow-up period within three Phase III double-blind randomized placebo-controlled pivotal trials in CIU/CSU: ASTERIA I, ASTERIA II, and GLACIAL. Sleep quality was assessed in all three studies using sleep-related questions included in an electronic diary, the Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life Questionnaire, and the Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale. Score changes from baseline in the treatment arms were compared with that in the placebo arm and adjusted for baseline score and weight. We also examined correlations of sleep scores at baseline, week 12, and week 24 and the slopes of change between sleep and itch and hive. RESULTS: Patients treated with omalizumab reported a larger reduction in sleep problems than those in the placebo arm; omalizumab 300 mg demonstrated the greatest improvement on all sleep components among all treatment arms. The largest reduction in sleep problems was reported within the first 4 weeks of therapy. After treatment discontinuation, sleep quality worsened. Sleep scores demonstrated moderate-to-strong correlation between them, and the change in sleep scores was associated with changes in itch and hives. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in sleep was reported after the first dose of omalizumab. Sleep continued to improve throughout the active treatment period. Patients receiving omalizumab 300 mg achieved greater improvement in sleep than those in other treatment arms. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01287117 (ASTERIA I), NCT01292473 (ASTERIA II), and NCT01264939 (GLACIAL).

4.
Pulm Pharmacol Ther ; 39: 54-63, 2016 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27354118

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is an unmet medical need for allergic asthma patients who are uncontrolled on conventional therapies. The aim of this study was to collect efficacy and safety data for QAW039, an oral chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on Th2 cells (CRTh2) receptor antagonist, for the treatment of asthma. METHODS: This was an exploratory phase II, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled multi-center study. Patients with mild-to-moderate uncontrolled allergic asthma (N = 170) were either without or weaned off inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting ß-agonists (LABA) and randomized (1:1) to QAW039 (500 mg once daily) or to placebo for 28 days. RESULTS: Overall, 157 patients completed the study. There were no significant differences between QAW039 and placebo for trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) or Asthma control questionnaire (ACQ) in the total population. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that patients with a FEV1 <70% of predicted at baseline treated with QAW039 had significant improvement compared with placebo in trough FEV1 (QAW039- Placebo [Δ] = 207 mL; 90% confidence interval [CI]: 96, 319; P = 0.002) and ACQ7 (Δ = -0.41; 90%CI: -0.69, -0.13; P = 0.009). QAW039 reached a mean maximum concentration (Cmax) of 3440 ng/mL on day 28 at a median Tmax of 1 h (range 0.5-4 h). Most adverse events (AEs) were mild/moderate and balanced between both groups, with no serious AEs. CONCLUSIONS: In the general study population, no improvement in lung function was observed with QAW039. However, a subgroup analysis revealed that patients with greater severity of airflow limitation (FEV1 < 70%) had improved lung function and asthma control when treated with QAW039. QAW039 also demonstrated a favorable safety profile. TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT01253603.


Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Ácidos Indolacéticos/uso terapéutico , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Receptores Inmunológicos/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptores de Prostaglandina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Administración Oral , Adulto , Antiasmáticos/efectos adversos , Antiasmáticos/farmacocinética , Asma/fisiopatología , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Humanos , Ácidos Indolacéticos/efectos adversos , Ácidos Indolacéticos/farmacocinética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Piridinas/farmacocinética , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 136(5): 1186-205.e1-78, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26371839

RESUMEN

The American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI) and the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI) have jointly accepted responsibility for establishing the "Practice parameter for the diagnosis and management of primary immunodeficiency." This is a complete and comprehensive document at the current time. The medical environment is a changing environment, and not all recommendations will be appropriate for all patients. Because this document incorporated the efforts of many participants, no single individual, including those who served on the Joint Task Force, is authorized to provide an official AAAAI or ACAAI interpretation of these practice parameters. Any request for information about or an interpretation of these practice parameters by the AAAAI or ACAAI should be directed to the Executive Offices of the AAAAI, the ACAAI, and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. These parameters are not designed for use by pharmaceutical companies in drug promotion.


Asunto(s)
Síndromes de Inmunodeficiencia/diagnóstico , Síndromes de Inmunodeficiencia/terapia , Comités Consultivos , Animales , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos
7.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 3(3 Suppl): S1-39, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25965350

RESUMEN

This parameter was developed by the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, which represents the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI); the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI); and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. The AAAAI and the ACAAI have jointly accepted responsibility for establishing "Contact Dermatitis: A Practice Parameter-Update 2015." This is a complete and comprehensive document at the current time. The medical environment is changing and not all recommendations will be appropriate or applicable to all patients. Because this document incorporated the efforts of many participants, no single individual, including members serving on the Joint Task Force, are authorized to provide an official AAAAI or ACAAI interpretation of these practice parameters. Any request for information or interpretation of this practice parameter by the AAAAI or ACAAI should be directed to the Executive Offices of the AAAAI, the ACAAI, and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. These parameters are not designed for use by the pharmaceutical industry in drug development or promotion. Previously published practice parameters of the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters for Allergy & Immunology are available at http://www.JCAAI.org or http://www.allergyparameters.org.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis por Contacto/terapia , Dermatitis por Contacto/inmunología , Humanos , Pruebas Cutáneas
9.
J Invest Dermatol ; 135(1): 67-75, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25046337

RESUMEN

ASTERIA I was a 40-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous omalizumab as add-on therapy for 24 weeks in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria/spontaneous urticaria (CIU/CSU) who remained symptomatic despite H1 antihistamine treatment at licensed doses. Patients aged 12-75 years with CIU/CSU who remained symptomatic despite treatment with approved doses of H1 antihistamines were randomized (1:1:1:1) in a double-blind manner to subcutaneous omalizumab 75 mg, 150 mg, or 300 mg or placebo every 4 weeks for 24 weeks followed by 16 weeks of follow-up. The primary end point was change from baseline in weekly itch severity score (ISS) at week 12. Among randomized patients (N=319: placebo n=80, omalizumab 75 mg n=78, 150 mg n=80, 300 mg n=81), 262 (82.1%) completed the study. Compared with placebo (n=80), mean weekly ISS was reduced from baseline to week 12 by an additional 2.96 points (95% confidence interval (CI): -4.71 to -1.21; P=0.0010), 2.95 points (95% CI: -4.72 to -1.18; P=0.0012), and 5.80 points (95% CI: -7.49 to -4.10; P<0.0001) in the omalizumab 75-mg (n=77), 150-mg (n=80), and 300-mg groups (n=81), respectively. The omalizumab 300-mg group met all nine secondary end points, including a significant decrease in the duration of time to reach minimally important difference response (⩾5-point decrease) in weekly ISS (P<0.0001) and higher percentages of patients with well-controlled symptoms (urticaria activity score over 7 days (UAS7) ⩽6: 51.9% vs. 11.3%; P<0.0001) and complete response (UAS7=0: 35.8% vs. 8.8%; P<0.0001) versus placebo. During the 24-week treatment period, 2 (2.9%), 3 (3.4%), 0, and 4 (5.0%) patients in the omalizumab 75-mg, 150-mg, 300-mg, and placebo groups, respectively, experienced a serious adverse event. Omalizumab 300 mg administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks reduced weekly ISS and other symptom scores versus placebo in CIU/CSU patients who remained symptomatic despite treatment with approved doses of H1 antihistamines.


Asunto(s)
Antialérgicos/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Antiidiotipos/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos H1/administración & dosificación , Urticaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antialérgicos/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Antiidiotipos/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Niño , Enfermedad Crónica , Método Doble Ciego , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos H1/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Omalizumab , Placebos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Urticaria/etiología , Adulto Joven
11.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 134(5): 1016-25.e43, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25174862

RESUMEN

This parameter was developed by the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, representing the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI); the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI); and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (JCAAI). The AAAAI and the ACAAI have jointly accepted responsibility for establishing "Food Allergy: A practice parameter update-2014." This is a complete and comprehensive document at the current time. The medical environment is a changing one, and not all recommendations will be appropriate for all patients. Because this document incorporated the efforts of many participants, no single individual, including those who served on the Joint Task Force, is authorized to provide an official AAAAI or ACAAI interpretation of these practice parameters. Any request for information about or an interpretation of these practice parameters by the AAAAI or ACAAI should be directed to the Executive Offices of the AAAAI, ACAAI, and JCAAI. These parameters are not designed for use by pharmaceutical companies in drug promotion.


Asunto(s)
Comités Consultivos , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos , Femenino , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estados Unidos
13.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 133(5): 1270-7, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24766875

RESUMEN

These parameters were developed by the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters (JTFPP), representing the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI); the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI); and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. The AAAAI and ACAAI have jointly accepted responsibility for establishing "The diagnosis and management of acute and chronic urticaria: 2014 update." This is a complete and comprehensive document at the current time. The medical environment is a changing environment, and not all recommendations will be appropriate for all patients. Because this document incorporated the efforts of many participants, no single individual, including those who served on the JTFPP, is authorized to provide an official AAAAI or ACAAI interpretation of these practice parameters. Any request for information about or an interpretation of these practice parameters by the AAAAI or ACAAI should be directed to the Executive Offices of the AAAAI, the ACAAI, and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. The JTFPP understands that the cost of diagnostic tests and therapeutic agents is an important concern that might appropriately influence the work-up and treatment chosen for a given patient. The JTFPP recognizes that the emphasis of our primary recommendations regarding a medication might vary, for example, depending on third-party payer issues and product patent expiration dates. However, because a given test or agent's cost is so widely variable and there is a paucity of pharmacoeconomic data, the JTFPP generally does not consider cost when formulating practice parameter recommendations. In extraordinary circumstances, when the cost/benefit ratio of an intervention is prohibitive, as supported by pharmacoeconomic data, commentary might be provided. These parameters are not designed for use by pharmaceutical companies in drug promotion. The JTFPP is committed to ensuring that the practice parameters are based on the best scientific evidence that is free of commercial bias. To this end, the parameter development process includes multiple layers of rigorous review. These layers include the workgroup convened to draft the parameter, the task force reviewers, and peer review by members of each sponsoring society. Although the task force has the final responsibility for the content of the documents submitted for publication, each reviewer comment will be discussed, and reviewers will receive written responses to comments, when appropriate. To preserve the greatest transparency regarding potential conflicts of interest, all members of the JTFPP and the practice parameter workgroups will complete a standard potential conflict of interest disclosure form, which will be available for external review by the sponsoring organization and any other interested individual. In addition, before confirming the selection of a Work Group chairperson, the Joint Task Force will discuss and resolve all relevant potential conflicts of interest associated with this selection. Finally, all members of parameter workgroups will be provided a written statement regarding the importance of ensuring that the parameter development process is free of commercial bias. Practice parameters are available online at www.jcaai.org and www.allergyparameters.org.


Asunto(s)
Urticaria/diagnóstico , Urticaria/terapia , Enfermedad Aguda , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Sociedades Médicas
15.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 132(4): 802-8.e1-25, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23938214

RESUMEN

This parameter was developed by the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, representing the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI); the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI); and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. The AAAAI and the ACAAI have jointly accepted responsibility for establishing "Environmental assessment and remediation: a practice parameter." This is a complete and comprehensive document at the current time. The medical environment is a changing environment, and not all recommendations will be appropriate for all patients. Because this document incorporated the efforts of many participants, no single person, including those who served on the Joint Task Force, is authorized to provide an official AAAAI or ACAAI interpretation of these practice parameters. Any request for information about or an interpretation of these practice parameters by the AAAAI or ACAAI should be directed to the Executive Offices of the AAAAI, the ACAAI, and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. These parameters are not designed for use by pharmaceutical companies in drug promotion. The findings and conclusions in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).


Asunto(s)
Cucarachas/inmunología , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/prevención & control , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/prevención & control , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Alérgenos/inmunología , Animales , Cucarachas/fisiología , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/etiología , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/inmunología
16.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 131(6): 1491-3, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23726531

RESUMEN

These parameters were developed by the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters (JTFPP), representing the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI); the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI); and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. The AAAAI and the ACAAI have jointly accepted responsibility for establishing "A focused parameter update: Hereditary angioedema, acquired C1 inhibitor deficiency, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-associated angioedema." This is a complete and comprehensive document at the current time. The medical environment is a changing environment, and not all recommendations will be appropriate for all patients. Because this document incorporated the efforts of many participants, no single individual, including those who served on the JTFPP, is authorized to provide an official AAAAI or ACAAI interpretation of these practice parameters. Any request for information about or an interpretation of these practice parameters by the AAAAI or ACAAI should be directed to the Executive Offices of the AAAAI, the ACAAI, and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. The Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters understands that the cost of diagnostic tests and therapeutic agents is an important concern that might appropriately influence the work-up and treatment chosen for a given patient. The JTFPP recognizes that the emphasis of our primary recommendations regarding a medication might vary, for example, depending on third-party payer issues and product patent expiration dates. However, because the cost of a given test or agent is so widely variable and there is a paucity of pharmacoeconomic data, the JTFPP generally does not consider cost when formulating practice parameter recommendations. In some instances the cost benefit of an intervention is considered relevant, and commentary might be provided. These parameters are not designed for use by pharmaceutical companies in drug promotion. The Joint Task Force is committed to ensuring that the practice parameters are based on the best scientific evidence that is free of commercial bias. To this end, the parameter development process includes multiple layers of rigorous review. These layers include the Workgroup convened to draft the parameter, the Task Force Reviewers, and peer review by members of each sponsoring society. Although the Task Force has the final responsibility for the content of the documents submitted for publication, each reviewer comment will be discussed, and reviewers will receive written responses to comments when appropriate. To preserve the greatest transparency regarding potential conflicts of interest, all members of the Joint Task Force and the Practice Parameters Workgroups will complete a standard potential conflict of interest disclosure form, which will be available for external review by the sponsoring organization and any other interested individual. In addition, before confirming the selection of a Workgroup chairperson, the Joint Task Force will discuss and resolve all relevant potential conflicts of interest associated with this selection. Finally, all members of parameter workgroups will be provided a written statement regarding the importance of ensuring that the parameter development process is free of commercial bias.


Asunto(s)
Angioedema/diagnóstico , Angioedema/terapia , Angioedema Hereditario Tipos I y II/diagnóstico , Angioedema/etiología , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/metabolismo , Angioedema Hereditario Tipos I y II/etiología , Angioedema Hereditario Tipos I y II/terapia , Humanos
17.
N Engl J Med ; 368(26): 2455-66, 2013 Jun 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23688323

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Moderate-to-severe asthma remains poorly treated. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of dupilumab (SAR231893/REGN668), a fully human monoclonal antibody to the alpha subunit of the interleukin-4 receptor, in patients with persistent, moderate-to-severe asthma and elevated eosinophil levels. METHODS: We enrolled patients with persistent, moderate-to-severe asthma and a blood eosinophil count of at least 300 cells per microliter or a sputum eosinophil level of at least 3% who used medium-dose to high-dose inhaled glucocorticoids plus long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs). We administered dupilumab (300 mg) or placebo subcutaneously once weekly. Patients were instructed to discontinue LABAs at week 4 and to taper and discontinue inhaled glucocorticoids during weeks 6 through 9. Patients received the study drug for 12 weeks or until a protocol-defined asthma exacerbation occurred. The primary end point was the occurrence of an asthma exacerbation; secondary end points included a range of measures of asthma control. Effects on various type 2 helper T-cell (Th2)-associated biomarkers and safety and tolerability were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients were assigned to the dupilumab group, and 52 patients were assigned to the placebo group. Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. Three patients had an asthma exacerbation with dupilumab (6%) versus 23 with placebo (44%), corresponding to an 87% reduction with dupilumab (odds ratio, 0.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.02 to 0.28; P<0.001). Significant improvements were observed for most measures of lung function and asthma control. Dupilumab reduced biomarkers associated with Th2-driven inflammation. Injection-site reactions, nasopharyngitis, nausea, and headache occurred more frequently with dupilumab than with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with persistent, moderate-to-severe asthma and elevated eosinophil levels who used inhaled glucocorticoids and LABAs, dupilumab therapy, as compared with placebo, was associated with fewer asthma exacerbations when LABAs and inhaled glucocorticoids were withdrawn, with improved lung function and reduced levels of Th2-associated inflammatory markers. (Funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01312961.).


Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Eosinofilia/complicaciones , Subunidad alfa del Receptor de Interleucina-4/inmunología , Adolescente , Agonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Antiasmáticos/efectos adversos , Antiasmáticos/farmacología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Asma/inmunología , Asma/fisiopatología , Biomarcadores/sangre , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Recuento de Leucocitos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Células Th2 , Adulto Joven
19.
Respir Med ; 107(5): 656-64, 2013 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23490226

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: A well-controlled study in patients with allergic asthma was warranted to assess dose-dependency between fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and sputum eosinophils to a combination of an inhaled corticosteroid plus a long-acting ß2-agonist. We sought to characterize the dose-dependency of mometasone furoate/formoterol (MF/F) using FeNO and sputum eosinophil percentage as surrogates of airway inflammation in subjects with allergic asthma. METHODS: Following a 2-week, open-label run-in, 93 subjects (≥12 y) using only short-acting beta agonist reliever medication as needed, were randomized to twice daily (BID) placebo; MF/F 100/10 µg, 200/10 µg, or 400/10 µg (via pressurized metered-dose inhaler [MDI]); MF-MDI 200 µg; or MF 200 µg via dry powder inhaler (DPI) during a 2-week, double-blind treatment period. RESULTS: All active treatments demonstrated significant percentage reductions from baseline in FeNO compared with placebo at all time points (P ≤ 0.034). At endpoint, mean MF/F treatment group FeNO reductions ranged from -35.3% to -61.4%. Sputum eosinophil percentage reductions from baseline were significant compared with placebo for the MF/F 200/10 µg, MF/F 400/10 µg, and MF-DPI 200 µg groups at endpoint (P ≤ 0.023). Escalating MF/F doses significantly reduced both FeNO (P ≤ 0.001) and sputum eosinophil (P ≤ 0.022) levels in a dose-dependent manner at all time points. All treatments were well tolerated; no serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: All 3 MF/F doses demonstrated pronounced, clinically meaningful, dose-dependent reductions in FeNO, with reduced sputum eosinophil levels for MF/F 200/10 µg and MF/F 400/10 µg. These findings suggest both inflammatory markers may be useful in assessing corticosteroid responsiveness in asthma patients, and perhaps identifying the same asthma subphenotype. Clinical Trials.gov: NCT00635882.


Asunto(s)
Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Etanolaminas/administración & dosificación , Pregnadienodioles/administración & dosificación , Administración por Inhalación , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/administración & dosificación , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/efectos adversos , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Asma/metabolismo , Asma/fisiopatología , Pruebas Respiratorias/métodos , Broncodilatadores/efectos adversos , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Ritmo Circadiano/fisiología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Combinación de Medicamentos , Eosinófilos/patología , Etanolaminas/efectos adversos , Etanolaminas/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Fumarato de Formoterol , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Glucocorticoides/efectos adversos , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Recuento de Leucocitos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Furoato de Mometasona , Óxido Nítrico/metabolismo , Ápice del Flujo Espiratorio/efectos de los fármacos , Pregnadienodioles/efectos adversos , Pregnadienodioles/uso terapéutico , Esputo/citología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
20.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 131(2): 295-9.e1-27, 2013 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23374261

RESUMEN

This parameter was developed by the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, representing the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI); the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI); and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. The AAAAI and the ACAAI have jointly accepted responsibility for establishing "Atopic dermatitis: a practice parameter update 2012." This is a complete and comprehensive document at the current time. The medical environment is a changing environment, and not all recommendations will be appropriate for all patients. Because this document incorporated the efforts of many participants, no single individual, including those who served on the Joint Task Force, is authorized to provide an official AAAAI or ACAAI interpretation of these practice parameters. Any request for information about or an interpretation of these practice parameters by the AAAAI or ACAAI should be directed to the Executive Offices of the AAAAI, the ACAAI, and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. These parameters are not designed for use by pharmaceutical companies in drug promotion. Published practice parameters of the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters for Allergy & Immunology are available online at http://www.jcaai.org.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Atópica/terapia , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Atención al Paciente
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA