RESUMEN
If retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF) is to play a role in the formation of collective memories, it should be long lasting. Although several studies have found that RIF is short-lived, there is other evidence to suggest that repeated selective practice schedules with a temporal gap between each practice trial may increase the durability of RIF. We tested this possibility in three experiments, focusing on socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting (SSRIF). In two experiments, participants studied scientific or story materials, then listened to someone selectively recall the material repeatedly, either in rapid succession or over an extended time period, and finally recalled the original materials either immediately, after a 1-week delay, or after a 3-week delay. A third experiment examined selective practice in free-flowing conversations. In each instance, RIF was found with repeated selective practice with a temporal gap between trials. The results are discussed in terms of the role RIF might play in the formation of collective memory.
RESUMEN
Through their selective rehearsal, Central Speakers can reshape collective memory in a group of listeners, both by increasing accessibility for mentioned items (shared practice effects) and by decreasing relative accessibility for related but unmentioned items (socially shared retrieval induced forgetting, i.e., SSRIF). Subsequent networked communication in the group can further modify these mnemonic influences. Extant empirical work has tended to examine such downstream influences on a Central Speaker's mnemonic influence following a relatively limited number of interactions - often only two or three conversations. We develop a set of Markov chain simulations to model the long-term dynamics of such conversational remembering across a variety of group types, based on reported empirical data. These models indicate that some previously reported effects will stabilize in the long-term collective memory following repeated rounds of conversation. Notably, both shared practice effects and SSRIF persist into future steady states. However, other projected future states differ from those described so far in the empirical literature, specifically: the amplification of shared practice effects in communicational versus solo remembering non-conversational groups, the relatively transient impact of social (dis)identification with a Central Speaker, and the sensitivity of communicating networks to much smaller mnemonic biases introduced by the Central Speaker than groups of individual rememberers. Together, these simulations contribute insights into the long-term temporal dynamics of collective memory by addressing questions difficult to tackle using extant laboratory methods, and provide concrete suggestions for future empirical work.