RESUMEN
Abstract Background and objective: There are few data defining the period of time in which preoperative tests can be considered valid. The purpose of this study was to determine the likelihood of changes in the results of preoperative tests previously normal in relation to time, and the impact of these changes on postoperative outcomes. Methods: A total of 970 patients with normal preoperative tests before the first surgery and who required a new intervention were included. The preoperative tests performed for the first procedure were compared with those performed for the second procedure. The following variables were assessed regarding their potential to induce changes in test results: sex, age, surgical risk, previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and presence of comorbidities. In-hospital outcomes were analyzed. Results: The median time between procedures was 27 months (6-84). The probability of change in at least one of the preoperative exams was 1.7% (95% CI: 0.5-2.9), 3.6% (95% CI: 1.8-5.4), and 6.4% (95% CI: 3.9-8.9) during the 12, 24, and 36-month intervals, respectively, for patients aged <50 years and 2.1% (95% CI: 0.7-3.5), 9.2% (95% CI: 5.9-12.5), and 13.4% (95% CI: 9.3-17.5), respectively, for patients ≥50 years of age. Age (p = 0.009), surgical risk (p < 0.001), chemotherapy (p = 0.001), radiotherapy (p = 0.012), and comorbidities (p < 0.001) were associated with the likelihood of changes in test results. Test changes were not significantly associated with in-hospital adverse outcomes (p = 0.426). Conclusion: For patients undergoing a second surgical procedure, the probability of change in previously normal preoperative tests is low during the first years after the first surgical intervention, and when changes occurred, they did not adversely affect the in-hospital postoperative outcomes.
Resumo Justificativa e objetivo: Existem poucos dados que delimitam o período de tempo em que os exames pré-operatórios podem ser considerados válidos. O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar a probabilidade de mudanças nos resultados de exames pré-operatórios previamente normais em relação ao tempo e o impacto dessas alterações nos desfechos pós-operatórios. Métodos: Foram incluídos 970 pacientes com exames pré-operatórios normais antes da primeira cirurgia e que requereram uma nova intervenção. Os exames pré-operatórios feitos para o primeiro procedimento foram comparados com aqueles feitos para o segundo procedimento. As seguintes variáveis foram analisadas em relação ao seu potencial para induzir alterações nos resultados dos exames: sexo, idade, risco cirúrgico, quimioterapia ou radioterapia prévia e presença de comorbidades. Desfechos intra-hospitalares foram analisados. Resultados: A mediana temporal entre os procedimentos foi de 27 meses (6-84). A probabilidade de alteração em pelo menos um dos exames pré-operatórios foi de 1,7% (IC 95%: 0,5-2,9), 3,6% (IC 95%: 1,8-5,4) e 6,4% (IC 95%: 3,9-8,9) nos intervalos 12, 24 e 36 meses, respectivamente, para pacientes < 50 anos e 2,1% (IC 95%: 0,7-3,5), 9,2% (IC 95%: 5,9-12,5) e 13,4% (IC 95%: 9,3-17,5), respectivamente, para pacientes ≥ 50 anos. Idade (p = 0,009), risco cirúrgico (p < 0,001), quimioterapia (p = 0,001), radioterapia (p = 0,012) e presença de comorbidades (p < 0,001) estavam associadas com a probabilidade de mudanças nos resultados dos exames. Alterações nos exames não se associaram significativamente a desfechos intra-hospitalares adversos (p = 0,426). Conclusão: Para pacientes submetidos a um segundo procedimento cirúrgico, a probabilidade de alteração nos exames pré-operatórios previamente normais é baixa durante os primeiros anos após a primeira intervenção cirúrgica e quando ocorreram mudanças não afetaram adversamente os desfechos pós-operatórios intra-hospitalares.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Reoperación , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Resultado del Tratamiento , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There are few data defining the period of time in which preoperative tests can be considered valid. The purpose of this study was to determine the likelihood of changes in the results of preoperative tests previously normal in relation to time, and the impact of these changes on postoperative outcomes. METHODS: A total of 970 patients with normal preoperative tests before the first surgery and who required a new intervention were included. The preoperative tests performed for the first procedure were compared with those performed for the second procedure. The following variables were assessed regarding their potential to induce changes in test results: sex, age, surgical risk, previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and presence of comorbidities. In-hospital outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: The median time between procedures was 27 months (6-84). The probability of change in at least one of the preoperative exams was 1.7% (95% CI: 0.5-2.9), 3.6% (95% CI: 1.8-5.4), and 6.4% (95% CI: 3.9-8.9) during the 12, 24, and 36-month intervals, respectively, for patients aged <50 years and 2.1% (95% CI: 0.7-3.5), 9.2% (95% CI: 5.9-12.5), and 13.4% (95% CI: 9.3-17.5), respectively, for patients ≥ 50 years of age. Age (p=0.009), surgical risk (p <0.001), chemotherapy (p=0.001), radiotherapy (p=0.012), and comorbidities (p <0.001) were associated with the likelihood of changes in test results. Test changes were not significantly associated with in-hospital adverse outcomes (p=0.426). CONCLUSION: For patients undergoing a second surgical procedure, the probability of change in previously normal preoperative tests is low during the first years after the first surgical intervention, and when changes occurred, they did not adversely affect the in-hospital postoperative outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Reoperación , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess a new modality of radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) called iMAP-IVUS (Boston Scientific, Santa Clara, California) during the evaluation of patients presenting with high-risk acute coronary syndromes. BACKGROUND: There are limited data on plaque tissue characterization and phenotype classification using iMAP-IVUS. METHODS: In the iWonder study patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-STEMI underwent three-vessel grayscale IVUS and iMAP-IVUS tissue characterization prior to percutaneous intervention. In total 385 lesions from 100 patients were divided into culprit (n = 100) and nonculprit (n = 285) lesions. Lesion phenotype was classified as (i) thin-cap fibroatheroma (iMAP-derived TCFA); (ii) thick-cap fibroatheroma; (iii) pathological intimal thickening; (iv) fibrotic plaque; and (v) fibrocalcific plaque. RESULTS: Culprit lesions had smaller minimum lumen cross-sectional area (MLA) with greater plaque burden compared to non-culprit lesions. Volumetric analysis showed that culprit lesions had longer length and larger vessel and plaque volumes compared to non-culprit lesions. iMAP-IVUS revealed that culprit lesions presented more NC and fibrofatty volume, both at lesion level and at the MLA site (all P < 0.001). Any fibroatheroma was more frequently identified in culprit lesions compared with non-culprit lesions (93% vs. 78.9%, P = 0.001), anywhere within the lesion 19.0%, P < 0.001) as well as at the MLA site (18.0% vs. 9.5%, P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Three-vessel radiofrequency iMAP-IVUS demonstrated a greater plaque burden and higher prevalence of any fibroatheroma as well as iMAP-derived TCFAs in culprit versus non-culprit lesions in patients presenting with STEMI or non-STEMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.