RESUMEN
Breast, chest wall, and regional nodal irradiation have been associated with an improved outcome in high-risk breast cancer patients. Complex treatment planning is often utilized to ensure complete coverage of the target volume while minimizing the dose to surrounding normal tissues. The 2 techniques evaluated in this report are the partially wide tangent fields (PWTFs) and the 4-field photon/electron combination (the modified "Kuske Technique"). These 2 techniques were evaluated in 10 consecutive breast cancer patients. All patients had computerized tomographic (CT) scans for 3D planning supine on a breast board. The breast was defined clinically by the physician and confirmed radiographically with radiopaque bebes. The resulting dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of normal and target tissues were then compared. The deep tangent field with blocks resulted in optimal coverage of the target and the upper internal mammary chain (IMC) while sparing of critical and nontarget tissues. The wide tangent technique required less treatment planning and delivery time. We compared the 2 techniques and their resultant DVHs and feasibility in a busy clinic.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia Conformacional/métodos , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Corazón , Humanos , Pulmón , Ganglios Linfáticos , Pared Torácica , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine the dose received by the contralateral breast during primary breast irradiation using IMRT compared to conventional tangential field techniques. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between March 2003 and March 2004, 83 patients with breast carcinoma were treated using 6, 10, or mixed 6/18 MV photons (65 with tangential IMRT technique and 18 with 3-dimensional technique using tangential fields with wedges) for primary breast irradiation following breast-conserving surgery. Paired thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were placed on each patient's contralateral breast, 4 and 8 cm from the center of the medial border of the tangential field. The TLDs were left on the patient during a single fraction and then measured 24 h afterwards. RESULTS: The mean dose delivered with photons to the primary breast for all patients was 4999 cGy (SD = 52) with a mean single fraction dose of 199 cGy (SD = 8). The mean percent of the prescribed dose to the contralateral breast measured at the 4- and 8-cm positions were 7.19% (SD = 2.28) and 4.63% (SD = 2.12), respectively, for patients treated with IMRT compared to 11.22% (SD = 2.73) and 10.70% (SD = 3.44), respectively, for the patients treated with conventional tangential field techniques. This represented a 36% and 57% reduction at the 4 and 8-cm contralateral positions, respectively, in the mean dose to the contralateral breast using IMRT compared to 3-D technique which was statistically significant (p < 0.0005, <0.0005, respectively). CONCLUSION: Primary breast irradiation with tangential IMRT technique significantly reduces the dose to the contralateral breast compared to conventional tangential field techniques.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/prevención & control , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/prevención & control , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Mama/efectos de la radiación , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiometría , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare the dose received by the contralateral breast during primary breast irradiation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy with the dose received via conventional tangential field techniques. METHODS/MATERIALS: Between March 2003 and March 2004, 44 patients with breast carcinoma were treated using 6-, 10-, or mixed 6/18-MV photons(36 with tangential intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique and eight with three-dimensional technique using tangential fields with wedges) for primary breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery. Paired thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed on each patient's contralateral breast, 4 cm from the center of the medial border of the tangential field. The thermoluminescent dosimeters were left on the patient during a single fraction and then measured 24 hours later. RESULTS: The mean dose delivered with photons to the primary breast for all patients was 4998 cGy [SD = 52], and the mean single fraction dose was 200 cGy [SD = 9]. The mean percent of the prescribed dose to the contralateral breast was 7.74% (SD = 2.35) for patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy, compared with 9.74% [SD = 2.04] for the patients treated with conventional tangential field techniques. This represented a 20% reduction in the mean dose to the contralateral breast with the use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy when compared with the dose received via the three-dimensional technique, a result that was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Primary breast irradiation with tangential intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique significantly reduces the dose to the contralateral breast when compared with conventional tangential techniques.