Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(36): e39593, 2024 Sep 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39252229

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Considering the invasiveness of the biopsy method, we attempted to evaluate the ability of the gamma distribution model using magnetic resonance imaging images to stage and grade benign and malignant brain tumors. METHODS: A total of 42 patients with malignant brain tumors (including glioma, lymphoma, and choroid plexus papilloma) and 24 patients with benign brain tumors (meningioma) underwent diffusion-weighted imaging using five b-values ranging from 0 to 2000 s/mm2 with a 1.5 T scanner. The gamma distribution model is expected to demonstrate the probability of water molecule distribution based on the apparent diffusion coefficient. For all tumors, the apparent diffusion coefficient, shape parameter (κ), and scale parameter (θ) were calculated for each b-value. In the staging step, the fractions (ƒ1, ƒ2, ƒ3) expected to reflect the intracellular, and extracellular diffusion and perfusion were investigated. Diffusion <1 × 10-4 mm2/s (ƒ1), 1 × 10-4 mm2/s < Diffusion > 3 × 10-4 mm2/s (ƒ2), and Diffusion >3 × 10-4 mm2/s (ƒ3); in the grading step, fractions were determined to check heavily restricted diffusion. Diffusion lower than 0.3 × 10-4 mm2/s (ƒ11). Diffusion lower than 0.5 × 10-4 mm2/s (ƒ12). Diffusion lower than 0.8 × 10-4 mm2/s (ƒ13). RESULTS: The findings were analyzed using nonparametric statistics and receiver operating characteristic curve diagnostic performance. Gamma model parameters (κ, ƒ1, ƒ2, ƒ3) showed a satisfactory difference in differentiating meningioma from glioma. For b value = 2000 s/mm2, ƒ1 had a better diagnostic performance than κ and apparent diffusion coefficient (sensitivity, 88%; specificity, 68%; P < .001). The best diagnostic performance was related to ƒ3 in b = 2000 s/mm2 (area under the curve = 0.891, sensitivity = 83%, specificity = 80%, P < .001). In the grading step, ƒ12 (area under the curve = 0.870, sensitivity = 92%, specificity = 72%, P < .001) had the best diagnostic performance in differentiating high-grade from low-grade gliomas with b = 2000 s/mm2. CONCLUSION: The findings of our study highlight the potential of using a gamma distribution model with diffusion-weighted imaging based on multiple b-values for grading and staging brain tumors. Its potential integration into routine clinical practice could advance neurooncology and improve patient outcomes through more accurate diagnosis and treatment planning.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética , Glioma , Humanos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Anciano , Glioma/diagnóstico por imagen , Glioma/patología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Clasificación del Tumor , Adulto Joven , Linfoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Linfoma/patología , Linfoma/diagnóstico , Meningioma/diagnóstico por imagen , Meningioma/patología , Curva ROC , Papiloma del Plexo Coroideo/diagnóstico por imagen , Papiloma del Plexo Coroideo/patología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adolescente
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA