RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It is necessary to determine whether the sequence of maxillary and mandibular surgeries in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery affects the accuracy of surgical outcomes. PURPOSE: The study aimed to measure and compare the accuracy among patients who underwent maxilla-first versus mandible-first bimaxillary surgery to correct a class III skeletal pattern. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients treated by a single surgeon at one center using Le Fort I and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy surgery. Exclusions included patients scheduled for one-jaw or maxilla-segmental surgery and those with craniofacial syndromes, such as clefts. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: The predictor variable was operative sequence for bimaxillary operations, divided into maxilla- or mandible-first groups. OUTCOME VARIABLE: The outcome variable was accuracy, measured using linear discrepancies between landmarks in the virtual plan and actual operative outcomes. The measurement of linear discrepancy that was closer to 0 was considered the more accurate result. COVARIATES: Sex, age, maxilla sagittal rotation degree, amount of posterior maxilla impaction, mandibular autorotation (°), and intermediate splint thickness (mm) were the covariates. ANALYSES: Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test and Pearson's correlation, with statistical significance set at P < .05. RESULTS: The sample comprised 60 patients with a mean age of 22.8 ± 3.7 years, of whom 36 (60%) were male. In the maxilla-first group, there were 30 subjects (60% male; mean age: 23.1 ± 4.2 years), with a mean mandibular autorotation of 0.41° (range: 0°-2.5°). The mandible-first group comprised 30 patients (60% male; mean age: 22.6 ± 3.3 years), with a mean mandibular autorotation of 5.46° (range: 1.9°-9.2°). The linear discrepancies for all landmarks did not significantly differ between mandible- and maxilla-first groups (P > .18). The mean three-dimensional discrepancies for all landmarks in maxilla-first group was 1.23 ± 0.5 mm and 1.23 ± 0.33 mm in mandible-first group, with no significant difference observed between the groups (P > .98). The amount of mandibular autorotation for intermediate splint application showed no significant correlation with the linear discrepancies (P > .58). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: In patients with skeletal class III malocclusion, mandible-first surgery in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery demonstrates accurate outcomes comparable to maxilla-first surgery.

RESUMEN

Although surgical accuracy has been evaluated in bi-maxillary procedures, few studies have investigated the relationship between maxillary and mandibular accuracy. The present study evaluated the effect of maxillary impaction accuracy on mandibular surgical outcome. This cohort study analyzed skeletal class III patients who underwent planned maxillary impaction in bi-maxillary surgery. The primary predictor was the difference between the virtual plan and surgical outcome in the maxilla, as determined by three-dimensional (3D) and vertical differences. The secondary predictors were the planned 3D distances in the maxilla and mandible. The primary outcome was mandibular surgical accuracy, defined as the difference between the planned and actual outcomes, calculated as 3D Euclidean distance. The study included 73 patients. Increased differences between the planned and actual outcomes in the maxilla were associated with increased differences in the mandible. The post-operative position of the mandible was closer to the planned position when the position of the impacted maxilla was superior than when it was inferior to the planned position. Moving the maxilla closer to the planned position resulted in a more accurate mandibular position. These findings suggest that careful surgical procedures are needed to avoid inferior positioning of the maxilla during maxillary impaction surgery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many studies on maintaining the condyle in a normal or anatomical position during orthognathic surgery have been conducted to stabilize surgical outcomes and prevent iatrogenic temporomandibular joint complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the changes in condylar positions after orthognathic surgery using virtual surgical planning via the balanced orthognathic surgery (BOS) system. METHODS: Postoperative changes in condylar position were retrospectively evaluated in 22 condyles of 11 patients with skeletal class III malocclusion who underwent orthognathic surgery using virtual surgical planning via the BOS system. The center point coordinates of the condylar head before and after orthognathic surgery were analyzed using voxel-based registration. RESULTS: Changes in the condylar position mainly occurred downward in the y-axis (-1.09 ± 0.62 mm) (P < 0.05). The change in the x-axis (0.02 ± 0.68 mm) and z-axis (0.01 ± 0.48 mm) showed no significant difference between before and after orthognathic surgery. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the changes in the condylar positions after orthognathic surgery using virtual surgical planning via the BOS system mainly occurred downward in the y-axis, with slight changes in the x- and z-axes. The change in the condylar position after orthognathic surgery using the BOS system is clinically acceptable.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Accuracy in orthognathic surgery with virtual planning has been reported, but detailed analysis of accuracy according to anatomic location, including the mandibular condyle, is insufficient. The purpose of this study was to compare the virtual plan and surgical outcomes and analyze the degree and distribution of errors according to each anatomic location. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated skeletal class III patients, treated with bimaxillary surgery. The primary predictor was anatomic locations that consisted of right and left condyles, maxilla, and the distal segment of the mandible. Other variables were age and gender. The primary outcome was surgical accuracy, defined as mean 3-dimensional distance error, mean absolute error, and mean error along the horizontal, vertical, and anteroposterior axes between the virtual plan and surgical outcomes. Landmarks were compared using a computational method based on affine transformation with a 1-time landmark setting. The mean errors were visualized with multidimensional scattergrams. Bivariate and regression statistics were computed. RESULTS: This study included 52 patients, 26 men and 26 women, with a mean age of 21 years and 3 months. The mean 3D distance errors for condylar landmarks, maxillary landmarks, and landmarks on the distal segment of the mandible were 1.03, 1.25, and 2.24 mm, respectively. Condylar landmarks, maxillary landmarks, and the landmarks on the distal segment of the mandible were positioned at 0.49 mm inferior, 0.28 mm anterior, and 1.25 mm inferior, respectively. The landmark errors for the distal segment of the mandible exhibited a wider distribution than those for condylar and maxillary landmarks. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement between the planned and actual outcome aided by virtual surgical planning was highest for the condyles, followed by the maxilla, and the distal segment of the mandible. It is important to consider the tendency for surgical errors in each anatomic location during operations.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Computer Assisted Simulation Surgery (CASS) is a reliable method that permits oral and maxillofacial surgeons to visualize the position of the maxilla and the mandible as observed in the patient. The purpose of this report was to introduce a newly developed strategy for proximal segment management according to Balanced Orthognathic Surgery (BOS) protocol which is a type of CASS, and to establish the clinical feasibility of the BOS protocol in the treatment of complex maxillo-facial deformities. The BOS protocol consists of the following 4 phases: 1) Planning and simulation phase, 2) Modeling phase, 3) Surgical phase, and 4) Evaluation phase. The surgical interventions in 80 consecutive patients were planned and executed by the BOS protocol. The BOS protocol ensures accuracy during surgery, thereby facilitating the completion of procedures without any complications. The BOS protocol may be a complete solution that enables an orthognatic surgeon to perform accurate surgery based on a surgical plan, making real outcomes as close to pre-planned outcomes as possible.