RESUMEN
This study was carried out to verify the evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of sotrovimab in patients with COVID-19. This is a systematic review of randomized clinical trials retrieved from the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Lilacs, and Cochrane Library databases. The risk of bias was measured using the Cochrane Risk and Bias Checklist (RoB 2). For the meta-analysis, RStudio Version 2024.04.2 software was used. The certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022355786). A total of 1893 studies were identified and four were included in the study. The total population consisted of 5470 patients with COVID-19, 1921 (35%) in the sotrovimab group and 3549 (65%) in the control group (placebo or BRII-196 + BRII-198 or casirivimab + imdevimab or bamlanivimab + etesevimab, administered in a similar way to sotrovimab, in a single dose with a 60-min intravenous infusion). For the effectiveness outcome, three studies presented low risk and one high risk of bias, while for safety all presented high risk of bias. The meta-analysis showed no significant difference between the sotrovimab and control groups in terms of hospitalization rates (95% confidence interval (CI) - 2.10-0.51; p = 0 > 0.05), use of invasive mechanical ventilation (95% CI - 2.78-0.65; p = 0.35) and mortality (95% CI - 0.92-0.59; p = 0.39). However, sensitivity analysis showed that sotrovimab may be effective in reducing hospitalization rates compared to the control (IV = - 1.57; 95% CI - 2.41-0.73; p = 0.99). The use of sotrovimab in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 had no significant impact on mortality and need for mechanical ventilation and did not appear to be safer compared to controls. However, there was evidence of effectiveness in reducing the rate of hospitalization, although the certainty of the evidence is moderate and the risk of bias is high.
RESUMEN
Studies suggest that gestational exposure to lead (Pb) is related to spontaneous abortions, preterm birth, lower infant birth weight and length, and neurological dysfunctions. However, the evidence about its effects during pregnancy exposure on fetal and child development is still poor. Thus, the aim of this systematic review was to verify the association between prenatal exposure to Pb and the occurrence of neurobehavioral deficits, miscarriages, and child mortality. Observational studies with pregnant women exposed to Pb during pregnancy were included, without gender or ethnicity restrictions. The MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and LILACS databases were searched. The reading of titles and abstracts was conducted, followed by reading in full format and data extraction, that were performed independently by two reviewers. The included studies were evaluated by Downs and Black tool and qualitatively synthesized. Certainty of evidence was assessed by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). The study protocol was registered with the Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42022296750). Among twenty-one studies included, sixteen were classified as prospective cohort, two case-control, one nested case-control, one cohort, and one longitudinal study. No study that evaluated child mortality associated with gestational Pb exposure was found. There is a very low certainty of evidence in the association of gestational Pb exposure and neurobehavioral deficits or miscarriages. This systematic review reflects the poor evidence and the challenges of human toxicology studies, since it was not possible to associate gestational Pb exposure to neurobehavioral deficits, miscarriages, and child mortality.