RESUMEN
This summary workshop report highlights presentations and over-arching themes from an October 2011 workshop. Discussions focused on best practices in the application of biopharmaceutics in oral drug product development and evolving bioequivalence approaches. Best practices leverage biopharmaceutic data and other drug, formulation, and patient/disease data to identify drug development challenges in yielding a successfully performing product. Quality by design and product developability paradigms were discussed. Development tools include early development strategies to identify critical absorption factors and oral absorption modeling. An ongoing theme was the desire to comprehensively and systematically assess risk of product failure via the quality target product profile and root cause and risk analysis. However, a parallel need is reduced timelines and fewer resources. Several presentations discussed applying Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) and in vitro-in vivo correlations in development and in post-development and discussed both resource savings and best scientific practices. The workshop also focused on evolving bioequivalence approaches, with emphasis on highly variable products (HVDP), as well as specialized modified-release products. In USA, two bioequivalence approaches for HVDP are the reference-scaled average bioequivalence approach and the two-stage group-sequential design. An adaptive sequential design approach is also acceptable in Canada. In European Union, two approaches for HVDP are a two-stage design and an approach to widen C (max) acceptance limits. For some specialized modified-release products, FDA now requests partial area under the curve. Rationale and limitations of such metrics were discussed (e.g., zolpidem and methylphenidate). A common theme was the benefit of the scientific and regulatory community developing, validating, and harmonizing newer bioequivalence methodologies (e.g., BCS-based waivers and HVDP trial designs).
Asunto(s)
Diseño de Fármacos , Administración Oral , Disponibilidad Biológica , Equivalencia TerapéuticaRESUMEN
To design a clinically viable small interfering RNA (siRNA) formulation, it is essential to understand the in vivo siRNA delivery mechanism during the product development. However, majority of reported siRNA delivery studies are based on testing only isolated factors, with ambiguous interpretation of often in vitro transfection results. Correlating physicochemical properties with in vivo transfection efficiency thus represents an important step towards rational design of siRNA delivery systems. In this study, design of experiments studies were applied to probe formulation attributes and process parameters, with in vivo activities evaluated as a primary response along with physicochemical properties. Statistical analysis was performed to identify the significance of each input factor towards the in vivo transfection efficiency using a Positive Readout System. The interactions between these factors were also analyzed. Our results indicated that among the formulation factors evaluated, the percentage of cationic lipid is of most significant effect. During the process, temperature stands out as the most significant factor impacting the in vivo activities. These results shed light on our design of siRNA lipid nanoparticle formulations in the early development stage.