RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) can be performed under general anesthesia or conscious sedation. The influence of type of anesthesiology care on procedural characteristics and ablation outcome in patients in whom intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) and elimination of adenosine-mediated dormant conduction (DC) is used is not entirely known. METHODS: 150 patients with paroxysmal AF were randomized to point-by-point radiofrequency catheter isolation of pulmonary veins (PVI) under general anesthesia (n=77) or conscious sedation (n=73). Adenosine-mediated dormant conduction was eliminated in all patients. Antiarrhythmic medication was discontinued after PVI. During twelve months of follow-up, all patients underwent four times 7-day ECG monitorings. RESULTS: There was no difference between groups in AF recurrence (28.6% vs. 31.5%, P=0.695). Patients in conscious sedation had longer procedure times (160 ± 32.1 vs. 132 ± 31.5 min, P<0.001), longer RF energy application times (40 ± 15 vs. 29 ± 11 min, P<0.001) and longer fluoroscopy times (6.2 min ± 5.3 vs. 4.3 min ± 2.2, P<0.001) with similar complication rates. CONCLUSION: Conscious sedation is not inferior to general anesthesia in regard to arrhythmia recurrence or complication rates of catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. However, it is associated with longer procedure times, longer time of radiofrequency energy application and longer fluoroscopy times.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Ablación por Catéter , Adenosina , Anestesia General , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Sedación Consciente , Humanos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The prognostic significance of adenosine-mediated pulmonary vein (PV) dormant conduction is unclear. We prospectively followed patients with adenosine-mediated PV reconduction with a subsequent repeated ablation until there was no reconduction inducible with patients without reconduction after PV isolation. METHOD AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients (n=179) with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) without prior catheter ablation (CA) were enlisted in the study. We used a point-by-point CA and general anesthesia in all patients. Twenty minutes after PV isolation we administered adenosine in a dose sufficient to produce an atrioventricular block. If a dormant conduction was present (n=54) we performed additional ablation until there was no adenosine mediated reconduction inducible. During 36 months of follow-up, all patients were examined for eight 7-day ECG recordings. There was no difference in arrhythmia recurrence rate between patients with and without dormant conduction (29.6 vs. 24.8% at 12 months, P=0.500; 31.5 vs. 30.4% at 36 months, P=1.000), for any echocardiographic parameter or any parameter of the ablation procedure. CONCLUSION: The patients with dormant conduction after adenosine during catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with complete elimination of the dormant conduction by additional extensive ablation have the same outcome in the long term as patients without a dormant conduction.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Venas Pulmonares/cirugía , Adenosina , Antiarrítmicos , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Humanos , Pronóstico , Venas Pulmonares/fisiopatología , Recurrencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) inducibility with rapid atrial pacing following AF ablation is associated with higher risk of AF recurrence. The predictive value of AF inducibility in paroxysmal AF patients after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), done under general anaesthesia (GA), remains questionable since GA might alter AF inducibility and/or sustainability. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n = 120) with paroxysmal AF without prior catheter ablation (CA) were enlisted in the study. All patients were ablated under GA. We have used a point-by-point CA and elimination of dormant conduction after adenosine in all patients. A predefined stimulation protocol was used to induce arrhythmias after PVI. Regular supraventricular tachycardias were mapped and ablated. Patients were divided into 3 subgroups - noninducible, inducible AF with spontaneous termination in five minutes, inducible AF without spontaneous termination. During 12 months of follow-up, all patients were examined four-times with 7-day ECG recordings. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between the three subgroups in a rate of arrhythmia recurrence (11.1 vs. 27.5 vs. 27.3%, P=0.387), despite a clear trend to a better success rate in the non-inducible group. The subgroups did not differ in left atrial (LA) diameter (41.0±6, 43.0±7, 42.0±5 mm, P=0.962) or in any other baseline parameter. CONCLUSION: AF inducibility as well as presence or absence of its early spontaneous termination after PVI done under general anaesthesia in paroxysmal AF patients were not useful as predictors of procedural failure.