RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Elderly persons have an increased risk for negative health-related outcomes, including higher mortality rates. A centre for geriatric traumatology was established in a German-speaking Swiss hospital to provide more specialised, person-centred care and to lower negative health outcomes. Adaptations and changes in the patient pathway were made by implementing fast-track and person-centred care to better address individual needs. METHODS: The current patient pathway was analysed by an interprofessional and interdisciplinary geriatric traumatology expert team. The practice development methodology and the Person-Centred Practice Framework (PCP-Framework) were used throughout this engagement process. In consensus within the expert team, the sample was defined as elderly persons aged 65 years or older with suspected hip joint closed fractures. The focus was on three elements of "practice environment" from the PCP-Framework. These were: (1) supportive organisational systems; (2) the physical environment; (3) appropriate skill mix. RESULTS: Several adaptations and changes were made addressing the three elements of "practice environment". These were for example: (1) use of specific assessments, shared decision-making; (2) proper and effective use of aids; (3) integration of Advanced Practice Nurses. The adaptations in the patient pathway were integrated into the standard operating procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Through active engagement with the practice development methodology and the focus on person-centredness, the process of care for elderly persons was adapted. Thus, by addressing individual needs, fast-track and person-centred care in geriatric traumatology is provided. Further research is needed to evaluate and to verify implications in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Traumatología , Anciano , Humanos , Suiza , Modelos de Enfermería , Hospitales , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) are useful tools to assess care needs of patients diagnosed with cancer and to monitor their symptoms along the illness trajectory. Studies regarding the application of ePROMs by advanced practice nurses (APNs) specialized in sarcoma care and the use of such electronic measures for care planning and assessing quality of care are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To explore the potential of ePROMs in clinical practice for assessing the patient's quality of life, physical functionality, needs, and fear of progression, as well as distress and the quality of care in sarcoma centers. METHODS: A multicenter longitudinal pilot study design was chosen. Three sarcoma centers with and without APN service located in Switzerland were included. The instruments EQ-5D-5L, Pearman Mayo Survey of Needs, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer, PA-F12, and Toronto Extremity Salvage Score were used as ePROMs. Data were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: Overall, 55 patients participated in the pilot study; 33 (60%) received an intervention by an APN, and 22 (40%) did not. Patients in sarcoma centers with APN service reported overall higher scores in quality of life and functional outcome. The number of needs and distress level were lower in sarcoma centers with APN service. No differences were found with respect to patients' fear of progression. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the ePROMs proved to be reasonable in clinical practice. PA-F12 has shown low clinical relevance. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Using ePROMs appears to be reasonable to obtain clinically relevant patient information and to evaluate the quality of care in sarcoma centers.