RESUMEN
While preliminary evidence suggests an association between legal involvement and suicide risk among veterans, no research to date has explored the prevalence and/or correlates of legal involvement among veterans at high risk for suicide. The current study examined the relation of suicide attempt, suicidal ideation, and psychopathology to history of criminal arrest in a sample of 286 veterans at risk for suicide. Results indicated approximately half (47%) of at-risk veterans had a history of arrest. Inconsistent with hypotheses, arrest history was not associated with history of suicide attempt, current suicidal ideation, or severity of psychopathological symptoms. Arrest history was, however, associated with diagnoses of substance use disorder and antisocial personality disorder in this high-suicide risk sample. Further, likelihood of an antisocial personality disorder diagnosis was associated with higher frequency of past arrests. Taken together, results indicate that many veterans at risk for suicide have a history of arrest, and at-risk veterans with such history likely have a specific pattern of psychopathology, including antisocial personality traits and substance use. As such, legal status and history of justice involvement may be important considerations when assessing suicide risk and management of this high-risk population. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Veteranos , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Ideación Suicida , Intento de SuicidioRESUMEN
Secondary microaggressions refer to the ways in which people of historically dominant groups negate the realities of people of marginalized groups. Gaslighting describes the act of manipulating others to doubt themselves or question their own sanity; people confronted for committing microaggressions deny the existence of their biases, often convincing the targets of microaggressions to question their own perceptions. 'Splaining (derived from mansplaining/Whitesplaining) is an act in which a person of a dominant group speaks for or provides rationale to people of marginalized groups about topics related to oppression or inequity. Victim blaming refers to assigning fault to people who experience violence or wrongdoing and is used as a tool to discredit people of marginalized groups who speak out against microaggressions or any injustices. Finally, abandonment and neglect refer to a bystander's failure to address or acknowledge microaggressions. Although these terms are commonly known among marginalized communities (and frequently used in popular media), there is a dearth in academic literature that substantiates these phenomena and relates them to microaggressions. The purpose of this article is to review these concepts in the psychological literature and to demonstrate the psychological harm caused by these behaviors on interpersonal and systemic levels.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales , Microagresión , Agresión , Gaslighting , Humanos , ViolenciaRESUMEN
Objectives. To examine relationships among actionable drivers and facilitators of stigma and nurses' intentions to provide the standard of maternal care recommended by the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric, and Neonatal Nurses (AWHONN) for incarcerated women.Methods. We conducted a Web-based survey of perinatal nurses in the United States (n = 665; participation rate 98.0%; completion rate 95.3%) in July through September 2017. We used multivariable logistic regression to predict higher than median intentions to provide the standard of care.Results. Lower stigmatizing individual attitudes and institutional norms and higher perceived autonomy when caring for an incarcerated woman were significantly associated with higher care intentions. Knowledge of the AWHONN position statement on the standard of care or their own state's shackling laws was not associated with higher care intentions.Conclusions. We documented significant associations among actionable drivers and facilitators of stigma and the intentions of a key health care provider group to deliver the standard of maternal care to incarcerated women. Individual- and institutional-level stigma-reduction interventions may increase the quality of maternal care and improve perinatal outcomes for women who give birth while incarcerated.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Servicios de Salud Materna/normas , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Prisioneros , Estigma Social , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Salud Materna/normas , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Community criminal justice supervised mothers are an underserved population who experience high rates of psychological distress and unique parenting challenges, but little is known about physiological stress system function in this population. OBJECTIVE: We tested the salivary biomarkers of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function as predictors of subjective maternal stress. METHOD: We recruited 23 mothers (age: M = 35.6 years, SD = 9.3 years; 35% Hispanic, 22% Black, 22% White, 22% multiracial) who were court mandated to a residential treatment center. We measured salivary alpha-amylase (AA) and cortisol, which index SNS and HPA activity, respectively, before and after a naturalistic reminder of a stressful parenting experience. We assessed self-reported parenting stress using the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form (PSI-SF) subscales Parental Distress, Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interactions, and Difficult Child. We used regression to test AA and cortisol mean levels and reactivity as predictors of subscale scores. RESULTS: Mean, but not reactive, salivary stress biomarker levels were associated with parenting stress domains. Mean cortisol levels predicted scores on the Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction subscale (adj. R = .48), whereas mean AA predicted Difficult Child subscale scores (adj. R = .28). DISCUSSION: Our results demonstrate the potential predictive utility of AA and cortisol as salivary biomarkers of maternal stress in community-supervised mothers. Given that maternal stress is associated with criminal recidivism and child behavioral health in this population, these biomarkers could potentially inform interventions to improve dyadic health and social outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores/análisis , Madres/psicología , Prisioneros/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Hidrocortisona/análisis , Sistema Hipotálamo-Hipofisario/anatomía & histología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Relaciones Madre-Hijo/psicología , Responsabilidad Parental/psicología , Sistema Hipófiso-Suprarrenal/anatomía & histología , Saliva , Estrés Psicológico/clasificación , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , alfa-Amilasas/análisisRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe perinatal nurses' experiences of caring for incarcerated women during pregnancy and the postpartum period; to assess their knowledge of the 2011 position statement Shackling Incarcerated Pregnant Women published by the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses (AWHONN); and to assess their knowledge of their states' laws regulating nonmedical restraint use, or shackling, of incarcerated women. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Online across the United States. PARTICIPANTS: AWHONN members who self-identified as antepartum, intrapartum, postpartum, or mother-baby nurses (N = 923, 8.2% response rate). METHODS: A link to an investigator-developed survey was e-mailed to eligible AWHONN members (N = 11,274) between July and September 2017. RESULTS: A total of 74% (n = 690) of participants reported that they cared for incarcerated women during pregnancy or the postpartum period in hospital perinatal units. Of these, most (82.9%, n = 566) reported that their incarcerated patients were shackled sometimes to all of the time; only 9.7% reported ever feeling unsafe with incarcerated women who were pregnant. "Rule or protocol" was the most commonly endorsed reason for shackling. Only 17.0% (n = 157) of all participants knew about the AWHONN position statement, and 3% (n = 28) correctly identified the conditions under which shackling may ethically take place (risk of flight, harm to self, or harm to others). Only 7.4% (n = 68) of participants correctly identified whether their states had shackling laws. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest critical gaps in nurses' knowledge of professional standards and protective laws regarding the care of incarcerated women during pregnancy. Our findings underscore an urgent need for primary and continuing nursing education in this area.