Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
N C Med J ; 82(5): 329-332, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34544768
2.
N C Med J ; 81(6): 377-380, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33139469

RESUMEN

The passage of the Affordable Care Act had a great impact on the landscape of public health programming and clinical preventive care in North Carolina. Large funding measures have supported community-based prevention efforts and led to policy, systems, and environmental changes to support a healthier population.


Asunto(s)
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Salud Pública , Aniversarios y Eventos Especiales , Humanos , North Carolina , Estados Unidos
3.
Eval Program Plann ; 65: 117-123, 2017 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28810211

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Health inequities are exacerbated when health promotion programs and resources do not reach selected populations. Local health departments (LHDs)1 have the potential to address health equity via engaging priority populations in their work. However, we do not have an understanding of what local agencies are doing on this front. METHODS: In the summer of 2016, we collaborated with informants from thirteen LHDs across North Carolina. Via semi-structured interviews, the research team asked informants about their LHD's understanding of health equity and engaging priority populations in program planning, implementation, and evaluation. FINDINGS: All informants discussed that a key function of their LHD was to improve the health of all residents. LHDs with a more comprehensive understanding of health equity engaged members of priority populations in their organizations' efforts to a greater extent than LHDs with a more limited understanding. Additionally, while all LHDs identified similar barriers to engaging priority populations, LHDs that identified facilitators more comprehensively engaged members of the priority population in program planning, implementation, and evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: LHDs are ideally situated between the research and practice worlds to address health equity locally. To promote this work, we should ensure LHDs hold an understanding of health equity, have the means to realize facilitators of health equity work, and recognize the complex context in which health equity work exists.


Asunto(s)
Equidad en Salud , Gobierno Local , Administración en Salud Pública , Entrevistas como Asunto , North Carolina , Investigación Cualitativa
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA