RESUMEN
Background: Platelets are a commonly used blood component to prevent or treat bleeding in patients with thrombocytopenia or platelet dysfunction. They are stored at room temperature (22-24°C) for five days unless specific measures are taken to extend the shelf life to seven days or more. After five days, this study evaluated platelet units' biochemical changes and bacterial growth. Study Design and Methods: Platelet concentrate was collected from 30 random donors: 8 females and 22 males. The collected samples were then placed on an agitator at room temperature and tested for their pH, protein content, and glucose levels using Roche Combur 100 Test® Strips. The Haemonetics eBDS™ System was used for bacterial detection. The measurements were taken on day five as the control and then repeated on days 7, 9, and 11 to observe any changes. On days 5 and 7, all parameters remained unchanged. However, glucose levels significantly changed (p=<0.0001) on days 9 and 11. Regarding pH, a significant change was observed on day 9 (p=0.033) and day 11 (p=0.0002). Results: There were no significant changes in all parameters on days 5 and 7. However, glucose was substantially changed (p=<0.0001) on days 9 and 11. For pH, there was a significant change in pH on day 9 (p=0.033) and day 11 (p=0.0002). Discussions: Our study found that platelet concentrate extension is possible for up to seven days. However, further studies are needed to evaluate platelet function during expiry time and to assess the stability of platelet morphology and function.
RESUMEN
Background: Since the beginning of COVID-19 pandemic, many associated factors have been investigated to clarify the susceptibility and severity among the affected individuals. Biological markers can play an important role in identification of individual susceptibility to such pandemic. Growing evidence suggest the influence of different blood group systems on susceptibility to COVID-19 virus, with a particular blood type conferring selection advantage. Objectives: The study aimed to determine the association of ABO, Rhesus (D) and P1 blood groups with COVID-19 susceptibility in Taif city, Western Saudi Arabia. Methods: ABO, D and P1 blood antigens were determined in 104 blood samples of COVID-19 patients versus 100 control samples using either automated immunohematology analyser or test tube method. Statistical differences between patients and control samples were calculated based on p-value where results of ≤ 0.05 were considered significant. Results: O+ve blood group constituted the predominant type among the studied samples. Determination of P1 antigen showed significant association where Anti-P1 was positive in 76.9% of patients compared to 61.0% of controls with a P value of 0.01 conferring the susceptibility of P1+ve patients to COVID-19. Conclusion: Although our study showed no significant association between ABO and D, and susceptibility to COVID-19, there was a significant association between P1+ve and COVID-19. P1+ve participants were 2.131 times more associated with the risk of COVID-19 infection than those with Anti P1-ve. Thus, P1 antigen can be used as a biological marker for identification of individuals susceptibility to COVID-19. It is strongly advised that such individuals should consider extra protective measures. Further studies on other contributing factors should also be considered for more scientific clarity.